THE RELATION BETWEEN VERBAL AND VISUAL EXPRESSIONS IN SANDERS AND DEMICCO’S “THE CROODS 1”

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Muhammad Ari Saputra
Djoko Sutopo

Abstract

Communication is generally defined as having both a verbal and nonverbal component. Verbal communication often refers to the words we use in communication whereas nonverbal communication refers to communication that is produced by some means other than words (eye contact, body language, or vocal cues) (Knapp & Hall, 2009:5). This study describes the relation between verbal and visual expression in “The Croods 1â€. The aims of this study are to describe how verbal relate to visual expression in “The Croods 1â€. There are six of facial expressions relate to visual expression and language features relate to verbal expression. The facial blueprints of the major emotions-how surprise, fear, disgust, anger, happiness and sadness are registered by changes in the forehead, eyebrows, eyelids, cheeks, nose, lips, and chin. This research used descriptive method with qualitative approach. The object of this research was “The Croods 1â€. There are 30 data of facial expression were identified in the movie. They are 5 data in surprise expression, 6 data in fear expression, 3 data in disgust expression, 6 data in anger expression, 7 data in happiness expression and 3 data in sadness.Hence, there are relations between verbal and visual expression in “The Croods 1â€. The researcher would like to give some suggestions about the analysis of dialogs in a film using semiotic approach such as used Ferdinand approach, Barthes approach, and Eco approach and so on.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Saputra, M., & Sutopo, D. (2016). THE RELATION BETWEEN VERBAL AND VISUAL EXPRESSIONS IN SANDERS AND DEMICCO’S “THE CROODS 1”. English Education Journal, 6(1). Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/12781

References

Bouzida, Feyrouz. 2014. The semiology analysis in media studies “rolandbarthes approach”. 8-10 September 2014- Istanbul, Turkey Proceedings of SOCIOINT14- International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities

Chandler, D. 2002. Semiotics: The Basic. Ottawa: Routledge.

Creswell, John. W. 2002. Research design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed methods Approaches 2nd Edition. California: Sage Publication, inc.

Doumont, Jean-Luc. 2002. Verbal Versus Visual: A Word Is Worth Thousand Pictures, Too. Technical Communication, Volume 49, number 2, may 2002. 219-224

Eco, U. 1976. A Theory of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Ekman, P. & Friesen, W.P. 2003.Unmasking The Face. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Ekman, P. Friesen. W. Ellsworth. P. 1972.Emotion in the Human Face. New York: Pergamon Press INC.

Jewitt, C. & Kress, G. (Eds). 2003. Multimodal Literacy. New York: Peter Lang.

Keyton, J. (2011). Communication and organizational culture: A key to understanding work experience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Kress, Gunther. 2010. Multimodality A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. New York: Routledge

Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A. 2009.Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction. Crawfordsville, IN: Thomson Learning.

Merlina, tina. Maulia, lia.Amalia, Rosaria. 2013. Verbal and Visual Expression of Emotions on Kaskus: A Semiotic Study. MIMBAR, Vol. 29, No. 1 (Juni, 2013): 85-91. ‘Terakreditasi’ SK Dikti No.64a/DIKTI/Kep/2010, berlaku 1-11-2010 s.d. 1-11-2013 85

Rahmasari,Indah. 2014.A Semiotic Analysis on The Help Movie Posters. Thesis. Study Program of English. Department of Languages and Literature. Faculty of Cultural Studies. UniversitasBrawijaya

Tao, Lin. 2014. Evaluating the Concept of ‘Face’ (Mentsu) in Japanese Verbal Communication.Intercultural Communication Studies XXIII: 1. Kanazawa University, Japan.