THE LANGUAGE FUNCTIONS USED BY TEACHERS OF CONTENT SUBJECTS USING ENGLISH AS THE MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTION (The Case of Mathematics and Science Teachers in Semesta Bilingual Senior High School)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Elysa Hartati

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the social and academic language functions of English employed in teaching content subjects and to explain the problems faced by the teachers when they taught content subjects using English. The data were obtained through classroom observation by recording the teaching and learning process with four different content teachers. The descriptive qualitative approach was usedto analyze the results of the study. The findings showed that 3 out of 4 content teachers had employed all kinds of social language functions. It indicated that they had a good ability to manage the classroom. In dealing with the academic language functions, it was found that all of the teachers had not used all kinds of academic language functions yet. It indicated that the teachers gave input more to the students by informing as mostly used. The result of this study revealed that the problems faced by teachers in using English were related to grammar,vocabulary, and pronunciation.  Employing social and academic language functions are crucial for teachers. Social language functions maintain the social relationship among the teacher-students especially in managing the classroom. Meanwhile, the academic language functions give deeper knowledge and skills related to the content material.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Author Biography

Elysa Hartati, Kampus Unnes Bendan Ngisor, Semarang, 50233

Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

How to Cite
Hartati, E. (1). THE LANGUAGE FUNCTIONS USED BY TEACHERS OF CONTENT SUBJECTS USING ENGLISH AS THE MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTION (The Case of Mathematics and Science Teachers in Semesta Bilingual Senior High School). English Education Journal, 3(2). Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/2711

References

Baker, Colin. 2001. Foundation of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 3rd ed. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Chamot and O’Malley. 1994. The CALLA Handbook: Implementing theCognitive Academic Language Learning Approach. NY: Adison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Coanca, Mariana. 2011. Common Language versus Specialized Language. Available online at www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/jisomg/SP11/JISOM-SP11-A22.pdf‎. Accessed on 18 May 2013.
Cummins, J. 2005. Bilingual and Immersion Programs. Available online at www.gaelscoileanna.ie/assets/Bilingual-and-Immersion-Programs.pdf‎. Accessed on 13 May 2013.
Hughes, G.S. 1990. Classroom English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lie, Anita. 2007. Education Policy and EFL Curriculum in Indonesia: Between the Commitment to Competence and the Quest for Higher Test Scores. TEFLIN Journal, volume 18, number 1.
Mansor, Norudin, et al. 2011. Teachers Perspective of Using English as a Medium of Instruction in Mathematics and Science Subjects. International journal of instruction. Volume 4 no.2. Available online at www.e-iji.net.
National Education System, The Law No. 20 Year 2003.
Suharyadi. 2010. Classroom interaction in English in mathematics and science classes (a case study at Rintisan Sekolah Bertaraf International (RSBI), RSMA-BI 3 Malang). Unpublished Thesis. Malang: English Department, Facultyof Letters, State University of Malang.
Sundusiyah, Anis. 2010. Teachers in International Standard Schools: What is missing? What can be improved? What does it take? . A paper presented the Indonesian Student International Conference.