APPRAISAL: RADAR FOR CATCHING MEANING AN ANALYSIS OF MICHAEL JACKSON’S ‘EARTH SONG’, ‘WE ARE THE WORLD’, AND ‘HEAL THE WORLD’
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Appraisal is a system of interpersonal meanings. In social relationship with others, interpersonal meaning acts as a tool for people to negotiate their attitudes and feelings. Therefore, every social event that appears is social relationship that results in a text that might be spoken or written. From this standpoint, song lyric is a kind of text through which the lyricist negotiates his or her attitudes and feelings with the listeners. This study intends to describe appraisal devices that occurred in the song lyric, to analyze the appraisal device implied in the song lyric by following the system network of appraisal offered by Martin and Rose (2003). The research method used in this study is qualitative descriptive in nature. The 3 song lyrics are, therefore, the data under analysis in this thesis. Since appraisals in written texts concern with the choice of words as devices to realize people’s attitudes and feeling, the unit of analysis in this study is appraisal device. The result of the study shows that in the lyric of earth song, it is found that there are 35 instances realizing affects, 11 judgments, and 10 appreciations. Meanwhile, in the song of heal the world there are 18 instances realizing affects, 22 judgments, and 9 appreciations. Whereas, in we are the world, there are 16 instances realizing affects, 18 judgments, and 12 appreciations. Moreover, among 56 chunks in earth song lyric, affect dominates the use of appraisal system (62, 50%) followed by judgment (19, 64%), and appreciation 17, 86%). In the meantime among 49 chunks in heal the world lyric; appreciation has less proportion of the use of appraisal system (18, 37%). Affect has bigger proportion of it (36, 73%). And judgment is the biggest of all (44, 9%). Then, among 46 chunks of we are the world lyric, this time the percentage of proportion of each of the three kinds of attitudes employed by the lyricist has relatively equal proportion. There is no domination among three of attitudes. But still judgment is in the first place with 39, 13%. Affect is in the second place with 34, 78%, and appreciation is in the last place with 26, 1%.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
Eggins, S. 1994. An introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter.
Gerot, L and P. Wignell. 1994. Making Sense of Functional Grammar (Revised Ed). Australia
Halliday, M.A.K. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London.
Halliday, M.A.K and Christian Matthiessen. 1999. Construing Experience through Meaning. A Language – Based Approach to Cognition. London: Edward Arnold.
Widdowson, H.G. 2007. Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1989. Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Deakin University: Deakin University Press.
Martin, J.R, Matthiessen and Painter,Claire. 1997. Working with Functional Grammar. London.
Martin, J.R. and Rose, D. 2003. Working with Discourse. Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Arnold.
Paul Gee, James. 1999. An introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method . New York: Routledge.
Thomson, Geoff.1996. Introducing Functional Grammar. London.
Jorgensen, Marianne. And Phillips, Louise. 2002. Discourse Analysis as theory and method. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Yusak, Muchlas. 2004. A Brief Introduction to Genre. Indonesia: LPMP Jawa Tengah.
_______ . 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris SD/MI, SMP/MTs, SMA/MA. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
But, David et. al. 2001. Using Functional Grammar: An Explorer’s Guide. Second Edition. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching Research. Macquire University.
Cresswell, John. W. 1994. Research Design Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. London: SAGE Publication.
Eggins, Suzzane. 1994. An introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter.
Eggin, Suzanne and Diana Slade. 1997. Analyzing Casual Conversation. London: Casell.
Gerot, Linda and Wignell, P. 1994. Making Sense of Functional Grammar (Revised Ed). Sydney: Gerd Stabler
Halliday, M.A.K and Christian Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Third edition. London: Arnold
Halliday, M.A.K and Christian Matthiessen.1999. Construing Experience through Meaning. A Language – Based Approach to Cognition. London: Edward Arnold.
Kress, J.R. 1976. Halliday: System and Function in Language. London: Oxford University Press.
Martin, J.R, Matthiessen, and Claire Painter. 1997. Working with Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
Miles, Mattew B., and Michael A Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. California: SAGE Publication, Inc
Thomson, Geoff.1996. Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Arnold