First Travel Fraud Case and the Legal Protection for the Victims
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Fraud committed by PT. First Travel has at least harmed prospective Hajj and Umrah pilgrims as many as 35,000 people, of which the material loss in this case is 500 billion. This is also suspected by the lack of strict regulations made by the state through Law No. 13 of 2008 concerning the implementation of Hajj and Umrah. However, until now the protection for the loss of first travel victims has not been completed, the decision of the Depok District Court with case number 83/Pid.B/2018/PN.Dpk which led to an appeal with case number 3096/K/PID.SUS/2018 decided on January 31, 2019. All assets seized were in accordance with the Decree of the Minister of Justice of the Republic of Indonesia Number M.04.PR.07.03 of 1985 concerning the organization and working procedures of RUTAN and RUPBASAN. This paper is indented to analyze the protection for the victims on the fraud case on PT First Travel Fraud case.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The copyrights of the article in Indonesian J. Int'l Clinical Leg. Educ. is on the Author(s), however, before publishing, it is required to obtain written confirmation from Author(s) in order to ensure the originality (Author Statement of Originality). The statement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0). All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions.
References
Anonim, http://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2017/03/03/berapa-jamaah-umrah-Indonesia diakses 20 Juni 2020
Anonim, https://www.merdeka.com/uang/ini-sebab-first-travel-gagal-berangkatkan-ribuan-jemaah-umrahpromo.html diakses 20 Juni 2020
Atmasasmita, R. (2005). Definisi kriminologis. Bandung, Tarsito.
Aziz, A., & Kustini, K. (2007). Ibadah Haji dalam Sorotan Publik. Jakarta: Puslitbang Kehidupan Keagamaan.
Dermawan, M. K. (2012). Pencegahan kejahatan: Dari sebab-sebab kejahatan menuju pada konteks kejahatan. Indonesian Journal of Criminology, 1(3), 108277.
Djanggih, H., & Qamar, N. (2018). Penerapan Teori-Teori Kriminologi dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Siber (Cyber Crime). Pandecta: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal), 13(1), 10-23.
Effendy, R. (1983). Ruang Lingkup Kriminologi. Bandung: Alumni.
Gosita, A. (1983). Masalah Korban Kejahatan Edisi Pertama. Jakarta: Akademika Presindo.
Harefa, S. (2019). Criminal Law Protection On Online Victims Of Victims. Veteran Law Review, 2(1), 33-45.
Hurwitz, S. (1986). Kriminologi, Disadur oleh: Ny. L. Moeljatno, Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Pornomo, B. (2017). Hukum dan Viktimologi. Bahan Kuliah Pascasaijana Magister Ilmu Hukum Pidana Universitas Padjadjaran Bandung, 2018.
Rajamuddin, A. (2014). Tinjauan Kriminologi terhadap Timbulnya Kejahatan yang Diakibatkan oleh Pengaruh Minuman Keras di Kota Makasar. Al-Daulah 3(2)
Sahetapy, J. E. (1987). Viktimologi: sebuah bunga rampai. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Traub, S. H., & Little, C. B. (1985). Theories of deviance. FE Peacock Pub.
Zulfa, E. A., & Santoso, T. (2001). Kriminologi. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi serta Perkembangannya Dewasa ini, Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta, 23-27.