Indonesian Journal of Pancasila and Global Constitutionalism

Translating Global Environmental Constitutionalism in the Indonesian Context: Pancasila vs. Liberalism

2024-04-05T07:56:30+07:00

The translation of global environmental constitutionalism into local contexts presents a complex interplay between universal principles and indigenous values. This paper investigates this dynamic within the Indonesian context, juxtaposing the principles of Pancasila, the state ideology, with liberal environmental constitutionalism. While global environmental constitutionalism emphasizes individual rights, liberal democracy, and market mechanisms, Pancasila is rooted in collective welfare, harmony, and indigenous cultural values. The analysis begins by delineating the core tenets of liberal environmental constitutionalism, highlighting its focus on individual rights to environmental protection and the centrality of democratic governance. It then contrasts these principles with the philosophical underpinnings of Pancasila, which prioritize collective well-being, socio-cultural harmony, and state intervention for sustainable development. Furthermore, the paper examines the implications of translating liberal environmental constitutionalism into the Indonesian context. It identifies potential points of convergence and divergence between liberal ideals and Pancasila-based governance structures. Challenges such as reconciling individual rights with collective welfare, integrating indigenous knowledge into environmental policymaking, and navigating the tensions between state intervention and market mechanisms are discussed. Through this analysis, the paper contributes to the ongoing discourse on global environmental constitutionalism by emphasizing the importance of contextual adaptation. It underscores the need for flexible frameworks that accommodate diverse cultural, political, and economic realities. Ultimately, it argues for a nuanced approach that recognizes the value of both universal principles and indigenous wisdom in shaping effective environmental governance systems within specific national contexts.

The Dark Side of Indonesia’s Democracy: Does Pancasila still hold influence?

2024-04-05T07:56:30+07:00

Indonesia's transition to democracy has been celebrated globally, yet beneath the surface lies a complex interplay between democratic principles and the enduring influence of Pancasila, the state ideology. This paper delves into the less-explored facets of Indonesia's democracy, probing whether Pancasila still exerts significant influence in shaping the country's political landscape. The analysis begins by contextualizing Indonesia's democratic journey, tracing its evolution from the authoritarian era to the present. It then examines the foundational principles of Pancasila and their historical significance, emphasizing its role as a unifying force amidst Indonesia's diverse socio-cultural landscape. Drawing on recent political developments, the paper investigates instances where Pancasila's influence intersects with democratic ideals, as well as instances where tensions arise. It explores how Pancasila has been invoked both to promote national unity and to justify restrictions on dissent and minority rights. Furthermore, the paper assesses the implications of Pancasila's enduring influence on Indonesia's democratic governance, particularly in relation to issues of political pluralism, freedom of expression, and minority rights. It highlights the challenges of reconciling Pancasila's collectivist ethos with democratic principles of individual rights and freedoms. Through this analysis, the paper contributes to a deeper understanding of Indonesia's democracy by shedding light on its complexities and contradictions. It underscores the need for critical reflection on the role of Pancasila in shaping democratic norms and practices, urging for a nuanced approach that upholds democratic principles while honoring Indonesia's unique socio-cultural heritage.

Indonesian Electoral Democracy: Between Pancasila and the Global Perspective

2024-04-05T07:56:30+07:00

Indonesia's electoral democracy stands at a crossroads, balancing the foundational principles of Pancasila with global democratic norms and practices. This paper examines the dynamics shaping Indonesia's electoral democracy, exploring the tensions and harmonies between Pancasila's ideological framework and international democratic standards. The analysis begins by contextualizing the evolution of Indonesia's electoral democracy, tracing its roots in the post-authoritarian era and the subsequent institutional reforms. It then delves into the core principles of Pancasila, emphasizing its emphasis on collective welfare, social justice, and national unity. Drawing on comparative insights from global electoral democracies, the paper evaluates Indonesia's electoral system in light of international standards of electoral integrity, transparency, and inclusivity. It identifies areas of alignment and dissonance between Pancasila's ethos and global democratic benchmarks. Furthermore, the paper scrutinizes the role of Pancasila in shaping electoral processes, political parties, and voter behavior. It explores how Pancasila's emphasis on consensus-building and inclusivity intersects with the competitive nature of electoral politics. Through this analysis, the paper contributes to a nuanced understanding of Indonesia's electoral democracy, highlighting the complexities of navigating between Pancasila's indigenous values and global democratic imperatives. It underscores the importance of balancing national identity with international best practices to strengthen the legitimacy and effectiveness of Indonesia's democratic institutions.

Ecological Justice in the Framework of Pancasila: Problems and Challenges

2024-04-05T07:56:30+07:00

This paper examines the concept of ecological justice within the framework of Pancasila, the philosophical foundation of the Indonesian state. While Pancasila emphasizes socio-cultural harmony and collective welfare, its application to ecological issues poses significant challenges. This analysis delves into the complexities of achieving ecological justice within the Pancasila framework, identifying key problems and challenges. Beginning with an exploration of Pancasila's core principles, the paper highlights its emphasis on social justice, democracy, and collective responsibility. It then discusses the intersection between Pancasila and environmental concerns, emphasizing the need for ecological justice to address issues such as environmental degradation, biodiversity loss, and climate change. Drawing on case studies and theoretical perspectives, the paper identifies several challenges in applying Pancasila to ecological justice. These challenges include reconciling traditional values with modern environmental imperatives, balancing economic development with environmental sustainability, and addressing power disparities in environmental decision-making. Furthermore, the paper examines the role of governance structures, policy frameworks, and civil society in promoting ecological justice within the Pancasila framework. It discusses potential pathways for integrating environmental considerations into Pancasila-based policies and practices. Through this analysis, the paper contributes to the discourse on ecological justice by exploring its intersection with indigenous philosophical frameworks like Pancasila. It underscores the importance of incorporating environmental concerns into Pancasila-based governance to ensure a more sustainable and equitable future for Indonesia and beyond.

Translating Pancasila in Global Justice Context: Does it matter?

2024-04-05T07:56:30+07:00

Pancasila, the philosophical foundation of the Indonesian state, encapsulates the principles of justice, humanity, and social harmony. However, as the world becomes increasingly interconnected, questions arise regarding the relevance and translatability of Pancasila in the global context of justice. This paper explores the significance of translating Pancasila's principles into global justice frameworks, examining its implications and challenges. Drawing on philosophical, legal, and sociopolitical perspectives, this paper argues that while Pancasila offers valuable insights into justice, its translation into global contexts requires careful consideration of cultural, political, and ethical nuances. Through comparative analysis and case studies, this paper investigates the feasibility and desirability of integrating Pancasila into global justice discourses, shedding light on the potential contributions and limitations of cross-cultural ethical frameworks.