Pros and Cons of Application of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in International Law: Various Practices in Southeast Asian Countries
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The concept of extraterritorial jurisdiction in international law has garnered significant attention due to its implications on sovereignty, human rights, and global governance. This paper explores the diverse practices and approaches towards extraterritorial jurisdiction in Southeast Asian countries, considering both the advantages and disadvantages associated with its application. The pros of extraterritorial jurisdiction include the ability to hold individuals and entities accountable for actions committed beyond national borders, thereby addressing transnational crimes, ensuring justice for victims, and upholding international norms and standards. Furthermore, it can serve as a deterrent against cross-border offenses, promoting stability and security in the region. However, the application of extraterritorial jurisdiction also raises several concerns and challenges. One of the primary drawbacks is the potential infringement upon state sovereignty, as it involves the assertion of legal authority over foreign territories and nationals. This could lead to tensions between states and undermine diplomatic relations. Moreover, inconsistent or unilateral application of extraterritorial jurisdiction may result in legal uncertainty and conflicts of laws, hindering international cooperation and legal harmonization efforts. By examining the various practices in Southeast Asian countries, including legislative frameworks, judicial decisions, and diplomatic engagements, this paper aims to provide insights into the complexities surrounding the application of extraterritorial jurisdiction in the region. It underscores the need for balanced approaches that reconcile the pursuit of justice with respect for sovereignty and international law principles. Additionally, it highlights the importance of multilateral cooperation and dialogue in addressing transnational challenges while safeguarding the rights and interests of all stakeholders involved. Overall, this analysis contributes to a better understanding of the nuanced dynamics shaping the debate on extraterritorial jurisdiction in international law and its implications for Southeast Asia's legal landscape and regional cooperation mechanisms.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Adams, Walter. "The Aluminum Case: Legal Victory--Economic Defeat." The American Economic Review 41.5 (1951): 915-922.
Akalanka, KAAN Thilakarathna. "The evolution of The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and Consular." Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of International Law and Jurisprudence 11.1 (2020): 67-83.
Breibart, Evan. "The Wood Pulp Case: The Application of European Economic Community Competition Law to Foreign Based Undertakings." Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law 19.1 (1989): 149.
Chimni, B. S. "The international law of jurisdiction: A TWAIL perspective." Leiden Journal of International Law 35.1 (2022): 29-54.
Colangelo, Anthony J. "Constitutional Limits on Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: Terrorism and the Intersection of National and International Law." Harvard International Law Journal 48 (2007): 121.
Colangelo, Anthony J. "The Legal Limits of Universal Jurisdiction." Virginia Journal of International Law 47 (2006): 149.
Colangelo, Anthony J. "What Is Extraterritorial Jurisdiction." Cornell Law Review 99.6 (2014): 1303.
Dorsett, Shaunnagh, and Shaun McVeigh. Jurisdiction. Routledge-Cavendish, 2012.
Florey, Katherine. "State Courts, State Territory, State Power: Reflections on the Extraterritoriality Principle in Choice of Law and Legislation." Notre Dame Law Review 84.3 (2009).
Harms, Erik. "Porous enclaves: Blurred boundaries and incomplete exclusion in South East Asian cities." South East Asia Research 23.2 (2015): 151-167.
Jeffrey, M. "The implications of the wood pulp case for the European communities." Leiden Journal of International Law 4.1 (1991): 75-107.
Kamminga, Menno. "Extraterritoriality." The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press, 2020.
Kanalan, Ibrahim. "Extraterritorial state obligations beyond the concept of jurisdiction." German Law Journal 19.1 (2018): 43-64.
Kannis, Eleni. "Pulling (apart) the triggers of extraterritorial jurisdiction." University of Western Australia Law Review 40.1 (2015): 221-243.
Lehmann, Matthias. "Legal fragmentation, extraterritoriality and uncertainty in global financial regulation." Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 37.2 (2017): 406-434.
Maier, Harold G. "Extraterritorial jurisdiction at a crossroads: an intersection between public and private international law." American Journal of International Law 76.2 (1982): 280-320.
Maier, Harold G. "Interest balancing and extraterritorial jurisdiction." American Journal of Comparative Law 1 (1983): 579-597.
Manullang, Sardjana Orba. "Understanding the Duties and Responsibilities of the Police in Criminal Cases in the Jurisdiction of a Country: A Study of Legal Literacy." LEGAL BRIEF 11.4 (2022): 2155-2166.
McCorquodale, Robert, and Penelope Simons. "Responsibility beyond borders: state responsibility for extraterritorial violations by corporations of international human rights law." The Modern Law Review 70.4 (2007): 598-625.
Middleton, Carl. "National human rights institutions, extraterritorial obligations and hydropower in Southeast Asia: Implications of the region’s authoritarian turn." Advances in Southeast Asian Studies 11.1 (2018): 81-97.
Morgan, Edward M. "Criminal Process, International Law, and Extraterritorial Crime." The University of Toronto Law Journal 38.3 (1988): 245-277.
Parthiana, I. Wayan. Pengantar Hukum International. (Bandung: Mandarmaju, 1990).
Passas, Nikos. "Cross-border crime and the interface between legal and illegal actors." Security Journal 16 (2003): 19-37.
Pramesti, Indriana, and Arie Afriansyah. "Extraterritoriality of Data Protection: GDPR and Its Possible Enforcement in Indonesia." 3rd International Conference on Law and Governance (ICLAVE 2019). Atlantis Press, 2020.
Puspita, Natalia Yeti. "ASEAN Mechanism for Human Security Problems in Southeast Asia: What's Wrong?." Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 19.2 (2020): 521-553.
Putri, Rahmatilla Aryani, Huala Adolf, and Jafar Sidik. "Law Enforcement of Cyber Crime Jurisdiction in Transnasional Law." 4th Social and Humanities Research Symposium (SoRes 2021). Atlantis Press, 2022.
Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions.
Ryngaert, Cedric. "The concept of jurisdiction in international law." Research handbook on jurisdiction and immunities in international law. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015. 50-75.
Stigall, Dan E. "International Law and Limitations on the Exercise of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction in US Domestic Law." Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 35.2 (2012): 323.
Sweeney, Brendan. "International governance of competition and the problem of extraterritorial jurisdiction." Comparative Competition Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015. 345-383.
Takeuchi, Mari. "Asian experience with extraterritoriality." Research Handbook on Extraterritoriality in International Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023. 164-179.
Ullah, AKM Ahsan, and Asiyah Az-Zahra Ahmad Kumpoh. "Are borders the reflection of international relations? Southeast Asian borders in perspective." Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs 5.3 (2018): 295-318.
Winerman, Marc, and William E. Kovacic. "Learned Hand," Alcoa", and the Reluctant Application of the Sherman Act." Antitrust Law Journal 79.1 (2013): 295-347.