Analysis Protection of the Right to Freedom of Religion in Prohibition of Worship at Al Aqsa Mosque by Israeli Police to Palestinians

: Palestinian Muslims complied with the clerics' call for a boycott by not entering the Aqsa Mosque compound on 2017 instead of protesting outside the compound of the shrine. The action comes after Israel tightened security by installing metal detectors into the compound after an attack that killed two policemen. As a result of this boycott, the aqsa mosque complex is very quiet. There are very few tourists and visiting Jewish visitors. Meanwhile, Muslims choose to perform the Prayers and rally outside the Haram al-Sharif Complex which includes the Dome of and the Aqsa Mosque. Hundreds of pilgrims perform Dzuhur prayers outside the main gate to the complex. Meanwhile a number of protesters held a similar demo in the same location. They shouted concerns over Israeli policy. But the authorities immediately drove them away. According to reports received by foreign media, a number of Palestinians were injured in the clash. In the local Israeli television station broadcast show, riot police beat and kicked the protesters who were mostly Palestinian Muslims. Once closed, the Israeli authority’s re -open access to the Aqsa Mosque in 2017. However, visitors must go through a series of security checks, including metal detection. A number of surveillance cameras Palestinian Muslims to be forced to perform the Friday prayers on the streets outside Jarusalem's walls. It was the first time in 50 years, the Aqsa Mosque and all road access leads to the mosque is closed to the public. This study is Intended to analyze the prohibition of workship practices in Al Aqsa Mosque In the perspective of human rights and freedom of religion.


I. INTRODUCTION
Human rights are the basic rights that human beings have since humans are related. Human rights can be defined as the inherent right of our nature as human beings who, if there is no such right, conceal us can live as human beings. Rights is owned by humans solely by humans, not because of them. 1 So human rights are independent of other people, other people, or other countries. Human rights are also a set of rights inherent in the essence and rolling human beings as creatures of God Almighty and is a grace that is Mandatory Dimensions, upheld and protected by the state, law, Government and everyone, for the honor and also the frequency of Court). Therefore, it is universal, meaning it applies anywhere and to anyone and can not be taken by. Right is a human being responsible for protecting himself and his human dignity as well as a moral foundation in associating or relating to fellow human beings. 2 On any right attached obligations. Therefore, in addition to human rights, there are also human rights obligations, namely obligations that must be implemented for the sake of implementation or enforcement of human rights. In the use of human rights, we are obliged to pay attention, respect, and respect the human rights that others also possess. Awareness of human rights, dignity and humanity, begins since humans exist on earth. It is due to the human rights that have existed since the man was born and is a natural right inherent in human beings. History records major events in the world as an attempt to uphold human rights.
In the opinion of Jan Purbo pranoto, human rights are a right that belongs to man by his 3 John Locke, and James L. Axtell. The educational writings of John Locke. (CUP Archive, 1968). Furthermore, Locke wrote that all individuals are equal in the sense that they are born with certain "inalienable" natural rights. That is, rights that are God-given and can never be taken or even given away. Among these fundamental natural rights: "life, liberty, and property." Locke believed that the most basic human law of nature is the preservation of mankind. To serve that purpose, he reasoned, individuals have both a right and a duty to preserve their own lives. Murderers, however, forfeit their right to life since they act outside the law of reason. Locke also argued that individuals should be free to make choices about how to conduct their own lives as long as they do not interfere with the liberty of others. Locke therefore believed liberty should be far-reaching. Please see John Locke, "Natural rights." Moral Reasoning: A Philosophic Approach to Applied Ethics. (London: Dryden Press, 1990), pp. 133-135. nature that is not separated essentially. Koentjoro Poerbapranoto (1976), Human Rights are the rights which man possesses according to his nature which can not be separated from the essence so that it is sacred.
Law No. 39 of 1999, Human Rights is a set of rights that are inherent in nature and the existence of human beings as creatures of God Almighty and is a gift that must be respected, upheld, and protected by the state, law, government and everyone for the honor and protection of the dignity and human dignity. So that we can conclude that Human Rights is a basic right that is owned by every human being who is given by God Almighty who can not be separated from human self then the rights must also be upheld and protected by the state, the law, Government, and everyone, for the sake of honor and dignity.

II. METHODS
In the case study used Methodology with a qualitative approach, which has a natural nature as direct data, descriptive, deeper process of results, analysis in qualitative research, and meaning as essential.
There are various research methods that use qualitative approach, which are as follows: ethnographic, case studies, grounded theory, interactive, participatory, and classroom action research. Qualitative research can also be done by interview method and also observation.
other than that, this research is also done subjectively so that can not be generalized.
In this case, the research used is case study that is: with the case that is happening by reading it or researching with maximal to get the result of this research. by studying the case of key words used for now,

III. WHETHER OR NOT THE PALESTINIANS BANNED FROM ENTERING THE AQSA MOSQUE INCLUDE VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS?
Since this world has been confronted and acquainted with a wide variety of cultures that spread almost all over the world, each of which has a striking difference. There will be different social and but it has also harassed humanity and the international community.

IV. LEGAL REGULATIONS ON FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND BELIEF
With regard to freedom of religion, the problem that gets attention is

V. THE APPLICATION OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM: NATIONAL & INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE
The application of religious freedom which is supposed to be in accordance with the Article In article 28E paragraph (1)  (1) Everyone is entitled to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right includes freedom to embrace or accept a religion or belief in its own choice, and freedom, individually or collectively, in public or private, to practice its religion or belief in worship, obedience, practice and teaching; (2) No one shall be compelled to undermine his or her freedom to embrace or accept a religion or belief according to his or her choice. The right to freedom of religion is categorized in the basic human rights category, is absolute and is in the internal forum which is the form of inner freedom (freedom to be). This right belongs to a non-derogable right. That is, the rights specifically stated in the human rights treaty as a right which can not be deferred by the State in any circumstances, including during hazards such as civil war or military invasion.
This non-derogable right is seen as the ultimate right of human rights.
These non derogable rights must be exercised and must be respected by the state under any circumstances and under any circumstances. 9 It is believed that religious freedom and trust must also contribute to the achievement of the goals of world peace, social excellence, and friendship between nations, and on the abolition of deology-the ideology and practice of colonialism and racial discrimination. others and publicly or alone, to realize religion or belief in worship.
With regard to freedom of religion, the issue of concern is on the everlasting provision that comes from the perspective of religious freedom. The rules are problematic, either because of problems with the principle of religious freedom or because they are contrary to others. Therefore, anachronism is a problem that needs to be resolved soon. However, the harmonization and refinement of the rules of law in the field of religious freedom has not been optimal, in fact, the field of freedom of religion, and relations between the rival highly dependent on the harmonization. Convinced that religious freedom and trust must also contribute to the achievement of world peace objectives, social stability, and friendship among nations, and to the abolition of the ideological and practice ideologies of colonialism and racial discrimination. Upholding the spirit of inter-religion and always respecting what they profess is one way of maintaining religious harmony, if there is a problem that carries the name of religion, keep completing the head cold and peaceful, without having to point and blame each other.