The Urgency of Completing Revision of Indonesia's Anti-Terrorism Law

: On 18 October 2002, Anti-Terrorism Law was signed into law by Megawati Soekarnoputri This kind of law has caused a significant legal controversy in because this law signed only six days after the unfamous Bali Bombings took place on 12 October 2002. The Law itself had first been drafted in 2002 more precisely in April on response to the then most recent terrorist incident which opened the eyes of global citizen from the danger of terrorism, the 9/11 incident in New York 2001. From 2002, The Anti-Terrorism LAW has been used to punish and investigate those who involved in the many incidents such as the bombing of the Marriot Hotel in 2003, the Australian Embassy incident in September 2004, and the round two of Bali bombing which take place in October 2005. Since 2005 the proposed revision of the Anti-Terrorism Law getting stronger. The proposed revision mainly talks about the addition of term of arrest and detention.


I. INTRODUCTION
Recent crimes, not only in the form of conventional crimes such as theft, murder, robbery, rape and so on, but have led to organized crime, white collarcrime, top hat crime, cyber crime, corruption, terrorist terrain. The latest crimes of crime can not be repudiated by regular conventional laws and regulations, because they are "extraordinary crimes" that require "extraordinary measures" as well.
The crime of extraordinary crime which has recently become the focus, not only the Indonesian government but also the international spotlight, is terrorism. 1 This is because terrorists are "humanist hostis generis" enemies of mankind. 2 The fight against terrorism is like 1 Francisco Galamas, "Terrorism in Indonesia: an overview." Research Papers 4, No. 10 (2015); Zora Sukabdi, "Terrorism in Indonesia: A review on rehabilitation and deradicalization." Contemporary Voices: St Andrews Journal of International Relations 6, No. 2 (2015); Aryono D Pusponegoro, "Terrorism in Indonesia." Prehospital and disaster medicine 18, No. 2 (2003): 100-105. 2 The term terrorism was originally used to designate an enemy of a territorial or cultural dispute against an ideology or religion that commits acts of violence against the public. Meanwhile, terrorists are individuals who are personally involved in acts of terrorism. The international provisions that define terrorism are Article 1 paragraph (2) of The League of Nations by the adoption of a Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of Terrorism which states that: … acts of terrorism [as] criminal acts directed against a State and intended or calculated to create a state of terror in the minds of particular persons, or groups of persons or the general public. Based on the characteristics of terrorism, there are similarities in characteristics with serious human rights violations, especially crimes against humanity regulated by international rules and the Law on Human Rights Courts. In terms of crimes against humanity in the 1998 Rome Statute, there are several important characteristics, namely the existence of attacks (attack), the existence of attacks that are broad (widespread) or systematic, the existence of actions that are part (as a part of) attacks that are broad in nature and systematic, and what is meant by knowledge of the attack. For futher discussion concerning to this issue terrorism as hostis humani generis, please see Guy B. Roberts, "Hostis Humani Generis: The threat of WMD terrorism and how NATO is facing the ultimate threat." Defence against fighting against a guerrilla group with an opponent and an obscure strategy. The regime was made unprepared for terrorism in Bali in 2002. The condition is quite reasonable because Indonesia did not have a law that regulate the eradication of crime-terrorism. 3 Before we start, it seems nice to begin with the definition of terrorism.
Terrorism comes from the word Terror which comes from Latin terrere, which means "tremble" or "frighten." Which is similar to fear, panic, and anxiety. In Indonesia term terrorism itself can be called new but in fact the term terrorism has been around for centuries.  The term Terrorism began to widely know since 2001 to be precisely when the 9/11 incident occurs 5 . That incident makes many nations began to make its own Law including Indonesia who start making a draft about Anti-Terrorism Law in April 2002. The main function of the Anti-Terrorism Law is to be a source to make investigation, prosecution, and conviction of the terrorist much easier. Anti-Terrorism Law also provides substantial penalties which include death for people who commit, or attempt to commit, terrorist offences and people who incite and assist them.
In the historical aspect, the presence of terrorism is predicted to emerge thousands of years ago, to be precise in the days of Ancient Greece. At that time, Xenophon used psychological warfare tactics as an effort to weaken his opponent. Then, at the end of the 19th century, before the advent of World War I, terrorism occurred in almost all countries. The presence of terrorism in the 19th century was initiated by adherents of anarchy understanding from various countries, such as Western Europe, Russia, and America. They believe in anarchy that killing people in power or influence with guns and bombs is the most effective way to carry out a revolution. The emergence of terrorists is certainly triggered by various things. In fact, most people know that acts of terrorism are unlawful acts. If they do so, they will be subject to criminal penalties. So, why are there still cases of terrorism in The Government started to think the same and since then the plan to revise the Anti-Terrorism Law are getting serious. The pressure to begin revising Anti-Terrorism Law has gained a major urgency following the January 2016 terrorist attacks in Jakarta. This was the first attack since the 2009 bombings in JW Mariot Hotels and this attack also mark the first in Joko Widodo's presidential era which began in October 2014.
One of the main reasons why deliberations have been dragging on for so long is that the government and the House of Representatives of the Reoublic of Indonesia (hereinafter as DPR) have failed to reach on an agreement on what constitutes terrorism. While the government argue that terrorism is "any deed that uses any violence or threats of violence on a public/massive scale, and/or causes damage to public/ strategic vital objects including the environment, public facilities or international facilities", the DPR argue that terrorism as a crime must include "any deed that is based on a political and ideological motives or threats to state security." 8

II. METHODS
The method used in this paper is a data collection. The following is data on terorism incidents occurring in Indonesia from 1999 to 2009:

REVISION: SOME LEGAL DISCOURSES
The revision of the Anti-Terrorism Law is more necessary in view of the rise of new extremist groups specially in Indonesia and the growing threat of radicalism and terrorism worldwide. Furthermore, also to prevent the threat proposed by Indonesian returnees after 9 Andi Wijayanto, "Menangkal Terorisme Global. fighting and also providing help for the radical Islamic State in Iraq and Syria also known as ISIS. 10 Indonesia will be be in a much stronger position to deal with international and also national terrorism if its anti-terrorism laws are stronger rather than what they have right now. The goal is to make the Indonesian police and its anti-terrorist departement to act before terrorist violence had taken place rather than after the incident.
Despite so far there are six major attacks and more than 25 minor attacks, Indonesia's anti-terrorism law has been so weak. ideologues already been proposed. The goal is to make Indonesia's anti-terrorism policies more effective and stronger. From that proposal, we can find a mixed reaction from public. For those who agree with that proposal argue that there is no mercy to those who involved in any terrorism act. And people who disagree with that proposal mainly argue about if we want to cope with terrorist, we have to see it from both eyes, the victim and the terrorist because sometimes terrorism initiaded with something really personal and even taboo such as religion.
In the further contex, a dreadful series of terror acts in the many cities in Indonesia including Jakarta, Depok and Surabaya within the past week have shocked the nation, once again. The attacks once again have put the country on high alert on the dangerous of terrorism. The terror acts, which killed many of people, including police officers and the terrorists themselves, shocked the nation, considering that the incident happen right before Ramadhan. The attacks were devastating not only for the victims and their group or family, but also for the people of Indonesia and citizen of the world. Worse, the

IV. CONCLUSSION
The revision of the Anti-Terrorism Act must be carried out appropriately, considering aspects in human rights. Thus, the handling of terrorism is not only on the side of broad users, but also must pay attention to the human rights protected UUD 1945. With human rights as an opinion in the revision of the Anti-Terrorism Act, the formulation of the articles regulated in the law, the law should be considered, for example to increase the deadline for arrest and privacy, and nobody can be exposed or arbitrary. In addition, in the revision of the Anti-Terrorism Act, there can be no elements existing in the law that can cause human rights suspected terrorists. Law enforcement officers are required to work professionally. Efforts to handle terrorism can proceed without addressing human rights.