REDESIGNING GENERAL ENGLISH I SYLLABUS FOR INTENSIVE LANGUAGE PROGRAM

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Agus Prayogo
Dwi Rukmini
Dwi Anggani Linggar Bharati

Abstract

The objectives of this study are: 1) to describe the current General English I syllabus coverage, 2) to find out the IAIN Walisongo student’s needs in General English I. 3) to explain the redesigning processes of the syllabus of General English I, and 4) to explain how suitable is the redesigned syllabus of General English I to IAIN Walisongo students. The study conducted was research and development (R&D) which consists of seven stages to redesign the syllabus. The instruments used to gather the data use questionnaire, interview, observation, and test. The subjects of the study were 68 students. The findings show that the current syllabus of General English I is an integrated course that is mainly about reading and grammar. The students’ needs deal with the materials and activity that can support them to practice and communicate as well as TOEFL materials. The redesigning syllabus employs systematic procedures including current syllabus, students’ needs, and institution policy that were needed to be considered in determining syllabus components. The syllabus suitability was justified based on five aspects namely lecturer’s ability to develop the syllabus, adult learning characteristics covered in teaching learning activities, characters classification, syllabus practicality, and competence achieved.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Author Biographies

Agus Prayogo, Kampus Unnes Bendan Ngisor, Semarang, 50233

Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Dwi Rukmini, Kampus Unnes Bendan Ngisor, Semarang, 50233

Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

Dwi Anggani Linggar Bharati, Kampus Unnes Bendan Ngisor, Semarang, 50233

Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
How to Cite
Prayogo, A., Rukmini, D., & Linggar Bharati, D. A. (1). REDESIGNING GENERAL ENGLISH I SYLLABUS FOR INTENSIVE LANGUAGE PROGRAM. English Education Journal, 3(2). Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/2710

References

Benesch, S. 1996. Need Analysis and Curriculum Development in EAP: An Example of a Critical Approach. TESOL Quarterly 30/4: 723-738
Borg, W.R. and M.D. Gall. 1983. Educational Research: An Introduction. New York: Longman Inc.
Dehnad, A. et.al. 2010. Syllabus Revision: a Needs analysis Study. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 9(2010): 1307-1312
Feez, S. & Joyce, H. 2002. Text-based Syllabus Design. Sydney: NCELTR, Macquarie University.
Hadley, Gregory.S. 1999. Innovative Curricula in tertiary ELT: A Japanese case study. ELT Journal.53/2: 92-99
Hutchinson and Waters. 2002. English for Specific Purposes: A Learning Center Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lickona, Thomas. 1991. Educating for Character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York: Bantam Book.
Nunan, D. 1988. Syllabus Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richards, J.C. 2003. Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
White, R. V. 1989. The ELT Curriculum: Design, Innovation, and Management. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell Inc.