Pengaruh Asas Kerahasiaan Data dan Informasi Wajib Pajak Pada Pengampunan Pajak (Tax Amnesty) Terhadap Penegak Hukum di Indonesia

Main Article Content

Ratih Damayanti

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to find out the implementation and issues of confidentiality principle in Act No. 11 of 2016 concerning Tax Amnesty and to determine the effect of the principle of confidentiality of data and information on taxpayers in Act No 11 of 2016 concerning Tax Amnesty for law enforcement in Indonesia. The principle of confidentiality in Tax Amnesty provides a potential moral hazard. A moral hazard occurs because of the opportunities that enable these actions to materialize. Opportunities for Fiscus and Taxpayers to meet in person. This has the potential to cause a gray area between the Taxpayer and the Fiscus which can cause a moral hazard to the Taxpayer. The authority of the Fiscus is prone to be misused so that it can lead to several criminal actions that can be carried out, namely embezzlement or corruption that can harm the country's finances. When the crime occurs at a Tax Amnesty Taxpayer, it will be difficult to enforce the law because the data and information sourced from the Statement and the attachments that are administered cannot be used as a basis for investigation, investigation, and/or criminal prosecution of the Taxpayer cannot be used as a basic investigation, investigation and/or criminal prosecution of taxpayers.

Article Details

How to Cite
Damayanti, R. (2019). Pengaruh Asas Kerahasiaan Data dan Informasi Wajib Pajak Pada Pengampunan Pajak (Tax Amnesty) Terhadap Penegak Hukum di Indonesia. Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev), 2(1), 291-306. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/islrev/article/view/38446
Section
Articles

References

Djafar Saidi, M., 2007, Pembaharuan Hukum Pajak, Penerbit PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
Maria SW Suwarjono, 1989. Pedoman Pembuatan Usulan Penelitian. Yogyakarta:

Fakultas Hukum UGM.

Marwan Effendy, 2012, Diskresi, Penemuan Hukum, Korporasi & Tax Amnesty Dalam Penegakan Hukum, Jakarta: Referensi
Nugroho, SBM, 2016. Kebijakan yang Tumpang Tindih dan Kontraproduktif.

Semarang: Suara Merdeka, 14 Maret 2016.
Rianto Adi, 2004. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial dan Hukum. Jakarta: Granit.

Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, 1994. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Sanafiah Faisal, 1990. Penelitian Kualitatif Dasar-Dasar dan Aplikasi. Malang: Y.A.3.
Soerjono Soekanto,1986. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.

Suharsini Arikunto, 1996. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta:

Rineka Cipta,

Jurnal Ilmiah

Agnes Harvelian, 2017, Implikasi Hukum Dan Legalitas Tax Amnesty Terhadap Tingkat Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Di Indonesia, Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 10 No. 3

Ardy Raditya Hendrawa, 2016, Implementasi Kebijakan Tax Amnesty Terhadap Lembaga Perbankan Dalam Melaksanakan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian, Jurnal Hukum Penerbit Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Web site

Silitonga, E. 2008. Ekonomi Bawah Tanah dan Pengampunan Pajak. http://www.unisosdem.org/article_detail.php?aid=5532&coid=2&caid=41&gid=3. 1 Maret 2018 (11:25)

Undang-undang
Nomor 11 Tahun 2016 tentang Pengampunan