Strategy to Strengthen State Administrative Law in Eradicating Corruption Practices by State Administration Officials
Main Article Content
Abstract
The lenient regulation of State Administrative Law is giving the practice of corruption an opportunity to take place in the enforcement of Indonesian governance. When in reality, the State Administrative Law is supposed to regulate various state administration activities, in which taking care of the practice of corruption being one of them. Therefore, this research offers strategies of the eradication of corrupt practices that have inflicted the state’s financial loss. The eradication can be done by reinforcing the implementation of a proper government. Various attempts are required to be done in order to construct a corruption-free governance’s structure, such as, applying the principle of good governance and closed bureaucratic system in the practice of the state’s enforcement; establishing a leadership spirit in a righteous governance to escalate the integrity and ethics of the state’s enforcement in order to steer clear from deviation and abuse of power; reinforcing the State Administrative Law by establishing strict, definite, and measurable laws; conducting and reinforcing anti-corruption establishment in both the state’s central and the countryside. The method of research applied is normative law research, which is by studying the law’s regulation in the Constitution and describing the role of the State Administrative Law as the authorized regulation that has the power to combat the crime of corruption.
Article Details
All works published in the Indonesian State Law Review are licensed & copyrighted under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
The editorial board of the Indonesian State Law Review shares common vision with Universitas Negeri Semarang as a Publisher in providing unrestricted access to knowledge and education for all and thereby follows Open Access Policy to showcase its content. The Indonesian State Law Review follows open access copyright and licensing policy on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Universitas Negeri Semarang and the Indonesian State Law Review adhere to Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. The authors submitting and publishing in the Indonesian State Law Review agree to the copyright policy under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Under this license, the authors published in the Indonesian State Law Review retain the copyright including publishing rights of their scholarly work and agree to let others remix, tweak, and even build upon their work commercially (for academic, scientific, and common purposes). All other authors using the content of the Indonesian State Law Review are required to cite author(s) and publisher in their work.
References
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah
Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan
Undang-Undang KPK Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi
Buku
Anggara, Sahya. 2018. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.
Erwin, Muhammad. 2012. Filsafat Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo. Hlm 123.
Hamidi, Jazim. 1999. Penerapan Asas-Asas Umum Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan yang Layak di Lingkungan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti. Hlm 24.
Soemitro, Ronny H. 1990. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Jurnal
Amir, L. 2013. Analisis yuridis hak gugat pemerintah terhadap pelaku pencemaran/perusakan lingkungan hidup berdasarkan UU No. 32 tahun 2009. Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Jambi: Seri Humaniora 2 (15).
Arrsa, Ria Casmi. Urgensi Membentuk KPK di Daerah. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi 2 (1): 215-234.
Hafidz, J. 1970. Malfungsi HAN dan Upaya Melakukan Rekonstruksi Sistem Hukum yang ada Menuju Hukum yang Melayani. Jurnal Hukum 2 (28): 841.
Muhardi. 2004. Kontribusi Pendidikan dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Bangsa Indonesia. Jurnal Mimbar 4 (20): 479.
Waluyo, B. 2017. Optimalisasi Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis 1 (2): 162.
Zaynul, Vicky dan Firdaus Syam. 2022. Penguatan Hukum Administrasi Negara Pencegah Praktik Korupsi dalam Penyelenggaraan Birokrasi di Indonesia. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi 7(2): 341-242.
Internet
Caesar, Monica Ayu. (Februari 6, 2022). Prinsip-Prinsip Good Governance Menurut UNDP. Diakses pada Juli 17, 2022, from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/02/06/02000091/prinsip-prinsip-good-governance-menurut-undp.
Fajri, Dwi Latifatul. (Februari 8, 2022). 8 Kasus Korupsi di Indonesia Berdasarkan Total Kerugian Negara Diakses 17 Juli 2022, from https://katadata.co.id/safrezi/berita/6201fc94110d8/8-kasus-korupsi-di-indonesia-berdasarkan-total-kerugian-negara.
Guritno, Tatang. (April 9, 2021). Penanganan Korupsi di Indonesia Tak Membuat Koruptor Jera. Diakses pada 17 Juli 2022, from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/04/09/18390681/icw-penanganan-korupsi-di-indonesia-tak-membuat-koruptor-jera.
Ramadhan, Ardito. (Januari 28, 2021). Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia pada 2020 Turun Jadi Peringkat 102 di Dunia. Diakses pada Juli 17, 2022, from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/01/28/14120521/indeks-persepsi-korupsi-indonesia-pada-2020-turun-jadi-37-peringkat-102-di.
Saputra, Andi. (Januari 14, 2021). Vonis Jaksa Pinangki Disunat dari 10 Jadi 4 Tahun Penjara! Diakses pada Juli 17, 2022, from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5605410/vonis-jaksa-pinangki-disunat-dari-10-jadi-4-tahun%20penjara#:~:text=Pengadilan%20Tinggi%20(PT)%20Jakarta%20menyunat,dan%20melakukan%20pidana%20pencucian%20uang.