PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN KINERJA GURU PRODUKTIF TEKNIK KENDARAAN RINGAN

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Agus Budi Utomo
Samsudi -
Djuniadi -

Abstract

Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian pengembangan hasil modifikasi model pengembangan dari Borg & Gall. Kegiatan penelitian terdiri atas tiga tahap: penyusunan instrumen, ujicoba terbatas dan ujicoba diperluas. Tahap penyusunan instrumen meliputi kegiatan kajian teori dan kajian empiris, penyusunan draf instrumen PKGP-TKR dan validasi pakar dan praktisi. Kegiatan tahap ujicoba terbatas meliputi, uji keterbacaan, uji sistematik, uji kepraktisan, uji validitas dan reliabilitas, evaluasi dan revisi. Ujicoba diperluas meliputi: ujicoba instrumen, evaluasi, dan revisi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) bentuk IPKGP-TKR SMK terdiri dari Instrumen perencanaan, persiapan, pelaksanaan, dan pengadministrasian sarana dan hasil praktek. (2)validitas dan Reliabilitas IPKGP-TKR menunjukkan hasil yang sangat baik. (3) kepraktisan Instrumen PKGP-TKR, memperlihatkan kepraktisan instrumen dalam rata-rata kriteria yang sangat baik, dan (4) efektivitas IPKGP-TKR menunjukkan efektif untuk dapat digunakan.

 

The research is a research and development method adapting from Borg & Gall‘s model. The research consists of three phases: instruments arrangement of assessment instruments of otomotive technical productive teacher performance, preliminary field testing and main field testing. The instruments arrangement of the assessment instruments consists of theoritical and emphiris studies, instruments draft arrangement, and experts and apprentices validity. Preliminary field testing consists of read testing, sistematic testing, practical testing, validity and reliability testing, evaluation and revision. Main field testing consists of instument testing, evaluation, and revision. The results of the research shows that: (1) assessment instruments forms of otomotive technical productive teacher performance of vocational high school consist of plannings, preparations, implementing, and administrating tools and the result of practice instruments; (2) validity and realibility of the assessment instruments shows very good result; (3) practicallity instrument of the assessment instruments show very good; and (4) the effectivity of the assessment instruments shows effective using.

 

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

Anonim. 2004. Kurikulum Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Edisi 2004 Bidang Keahlian Teknik Mesin. Jakarta : Dirdikmenjur Depdiknas
Borg & Gall. 1983. Educational Research, An Introduction. New York and London. Longman Inc.
Borg & Gall. 2003. Educational Research, An Introduction. New York and London. Longman Inc.
Coburn & Louisa. 1984. “Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance”. ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests Measurement and Evaluation Princeton NJ. Journal Of Educational Psychology, Vol.71 (April 1979) pp. 149-160
Mertler, C. A. 1997. “Students as stakeholders in teacher evaluation: Teacher perceptions of a formative feedback model”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 413 328)
Miller, P. W. 2008. Measurement and teaching. Indiana: Pwmilleronline.
Nawawi, H. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Bisnis Yang Kompetitif. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, Cet VI
Pedoman Pelaksanaan Penilaian Kinerja Guru 2012. Buku 2. Jakarta: Badan PSDMP Dan KPMP Kemendikbud.
Permen PAN dan Reformasi Birokrasi nomor 16 Tahun 2009. Tentang Jabatan Fungsional Pustakawan Dan Angka Kreditnya.
Permendiknas No. 35 Tahun 2010 tentang Petunjuk teknis Pelaksanaan Jabatan Fungsional Guru dan Angka Kreditnya.
Soeprijanto. 2010. Pengukuran Kinerja Guru Praktik Kejuruan. Jakarta: CV. Tursina
Sudarman. 2007. “Perilaku Guru Praktik Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Bidang Keahlian Teknik Mesin Dalam Melaksanakan Tugas Pembelajaran Praktik”. Jurnal PTM, Volume 7, No. 2, Desember 2007, UNNES, Semarang
Wagiran & Sadtyadi. 2014. “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Guru Sekolah Dasar Berbasis Tugas Pokok Dan Fungsi”. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, UNY. Tahun 18, Nomor 2, hal. 290 – 304
Widiyanto. 2011. "Guru Bersertifikasi, di Mana Dikau?". Kompas. Sabtu 7 Mei.