https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JPP/article/view/12368
Bakir, S., & Bİçer, E. Ö. (2015). Logical Thinking and Cognitive Development Levels of Pre-service Science Teachers. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 5(1), 149-163. Retrieved from
http://ebad-jesr.com/images/MAKALE_ARSIV/C5_S1makaleler/5.1.09.pdf
Benešová, A., & Tupa, J. (2017). Requirements for Education and Qualification of People in Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 11(June), 2195-2202. Retrieved from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351978917305747
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Boston, MA: Springer. Retrieved from
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-0-387-09506-6
Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2017). 21st Century Skills Development Through Inquiry-Based Learning. Singapore: Springer. Retrieved from
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-981-10-2481-8
Egan, K. (2012). Education and Psychology Plato, Piaget and Scientific Psychology. USA: Routledge.
Herawati, F. (2016). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan PMRI Berorientasi pada Kemampuan Representasi Matematis. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 34-44. Retrieved from
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/9685
Marwazi, M., Masrukan, & Putra, N. M. D. (2018). Analysis of Problem Solving Ability Based on Field Dependent Cognitive Style in Discovery Learning Models. Journal of Primary Education, 8(2), 127-134. Retrieved from
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/article/view/25451
Patel, S. R., Margolies, P. J., Covell, N. H., Lipscomb, C., & Dixon, L. B. (2018). Using Instructional Design, Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate, to Develop e-Learning Modules to Disseminate Supported Employment for Community Behavioral Health Treatment Programs in New York State. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 113. Retrieved from
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00113/full
Schuck, S., Kearney, M., & Burden, K. (2017). Exploring Mobile Learning in the Third Space. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 121-137. Retrieved from
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1230555
Sugiyono. (2012). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using Realistic Mathematics Education and The DAPIC Problem-Solving Process to Enhance Secondary School Students’ Mathematical Literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(3), 307-315. Retrieved from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452315117303685
Wan, N., & Nicholas, H. (2013). A Framework for Sustainable Mobile Learning in Schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), 695-715. Retrieved from
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01359.x
Wardono, Waluya, S. B., Mariani, S., & Candra, S. D. (2016). Mathematics Literacy on Problem Based Learning with Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education Approach Assisted E-Learning Edmodo. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 693(1). Retrieved from
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/693/1/012014
- Abstract viewed - 568 times
- pdf downloaded - 4053 times
Affiliations
Ahmad Saiful Mirza
Public Elementary School Wringinjajar 3, Mranggen, Demak, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
Farid Ahmadi
Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Tri Suminar
Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
How to Cite
Development of Realistic Mathematics Education Mobile Learning in Elementary School
Vol 8 No 2 (2019): February 2019
Submitted: Sep 20, 2018
Published:
Abstract
The research is motivated by the lack of ICT-based learning media, mathematics learning for elementary school children is still inductive, and lacks of good character attitudes. The purpose of this study was to develop realistic mathematics education mobile learning for elementary school students. The research method used ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, and Evaluate). Based on the needs analysis, both students and teachers need a realistic learning media that can be represented through smartphone or tablet devices to support the learning. So, it is important to develop realistic mathematics education mobile learning. The product was validated by media experts, material experts, and practitioners. The results of expert validation get percentage of 90% with very good category for its performance, 92.5% with very good category for the content competency. Furthermore, validation results from practitioners get 89% with very good categories. The realistic mathematics education mobile learning contains elements used in context, used of models, interactivity, students contribution, and interwoven. In addition, the media contained concrete images, videos, sounds, and questions that are arranged in online system. Based on these results it can be said that the realistic mathematics education mobile learning is valid for use.