http://mei.org.uk/files/pdf/rme_impact_booklet.pdf
Freitas, D. E. (2008). Critical mathematics education: recognizing the ethical dimension of problem solving. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 79-95. Retrieved from
https://www.iejme.com/article/critical-math ematics-education-recognizing-the-ethical-dim ension-of-problem-solving
Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute.
Hirza, B., Kusumah, Y. S., Darhim, & Zulkardi. (2014). Improving intuition skills with realistic mathematics education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 5(1), 27-34. Retrieved from
https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/view/1446
Ichwatun, A. 2015. Pengaruh metode rme (realistic mathematic education) berbasis scientific approach terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada mapel matematika materi sifat bangun datar kelas iii mi nu 05 tamangede kec. Gemuh kab. Kendal. Undergraduate Thesis. Semarang: UIN Walisongo. Retrieved from
http://eprints.walisongo.ac.id/5197
Karyadi, Suyitno, H., & Dwidayati, N. K. (2018). Analisis analysis the ability of students mathematical literacy on the realistic mathematic education learning with the loads of the character of islam. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 7(1), 18-25. Retrieved from
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/article/view/22560
Krulik, S. (1995). The new sourcebook for teaching reasoning and problem solving in elementary school. Needham Height.
Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton: New Jersey.
Saleh, M., Darhim, & Sabandar, J. (2017). The enhancement of problem solving ability through realistic mathematics education approach. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(5), 159-168. Retrieved from
https://www.ijern.com/journal/2017/May-2017/14.pdf
Sembiring, R. K., Hadi, S., & Dolk, M. (2008). Reforming mathematics learning in indonesian classrooms through rme. ZDM: the international journal on mathematics education, 40(6), 927-939. Retrieved from
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11858-008-0125-9
Sugesti, F. E., Budiyono, & Subanti, S. (2014). Eksperimentasi model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe structured numbered heads (snh) dan two stay two stray (tsts) dengan pendekatan realistic mathematics education (rme) pada prestasi belajar matematika ditinjau dari adversity quotient (aq) siswa. Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 1-10. Retrieved from
http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/jmme/article/view/10029
Sugiyono. 2015. Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susanto, A. 2016. Teori belajar dan pembelajaran di sekolah dasar. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
- Abstract viewed - 98 times
- pdf downloaded - 105 times
Affiliations
Muhammad Jamalul Huda
Universitas Islam Sultan Agung, Semarang, Indonesia
Totok Sumaryanto Florentinus
Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Sunyoto Eko Nugroho
Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
How to Cite
Students’ Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability at Realistic Mathematics Education (RME)
Vol 8 No 5 (2019): June 2019
Submitted: Aug 13, 2019
Published: Aug 13, 2019
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the Realistic Mathematics Education model on mathematics problem-solving ability of students and analyze the mathematical problem-solving ability of students based on Polya steps. The method used is the sequential explanatory mixed-method design. The sample in this study is the fourth-grade students of Public Elementary School Bintoro 8 and the fourth-grade students of Public Elementary School Bintoro 9. Quantitative data were analyzed using a t-test and N-gain test based on the value of mathematical problem-solving ability. Qualitative data were analyzed through five procedures: data collection, triangulation, reduction, data presentation, and verification. The results showed that the average difference of mathematical problem-solving ability of students experimental class is better than the control class, improvement of mathematics problem-solving ability of students in the experimental class is higher than the control class. In the high category, students can apply the measures to see, plan, d, and check it well. In the medium category students can apply the measures see, plan, do and check, but there is an error in the operation so that the results of any settlement, while in the low category of students has not concluded.