Liberalization of Health Services in Indonesia in The Context of Justice
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Health is an important factor for maintaining living standards. In human rights which is explained in more detail, health is included in the rights of every human. That rights also includes right to get good health services. But in practice, the health services provided sometimes are not in accordance with what was been regulated in the code of ethics, obligation and violating human rights. This study compared one cases with another cases. We analyze the cases by comparing existing regulations, such as Indonesian constitution, health pofession ethics and hospital ethics. The study emphasized and found that in the Indonesian Constitution and the code of ethics there are no rules for distinguishing patients. In terms of health, all communities should be considered equal. Because this concerns human rights which say that health is an absolute right for every human being. The hospitals nd the staff who work in that hospitals can be threatened with criminal law or civil law. The study concluded that discrimination in helath services should not occur in Indonesia or in other countries. Because in Indonesia, health is the ideals and goals of Indonesian nation, and also an element of human rights. Health services in Indonesia must be based on Pancasila and based on humanitarian values, health ethics, professionalism, equality and anti-discrimination, equity and justice.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Authors(s) retain copyrights of the Article published on Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review. However, before publishing, it is required to obtain written confirmation from Author(s) in order to ensure the originality (Author Statement of Originality). The statement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable. This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
References
Al Ghani, M. (2020). Pengaruh FDI dan Free Flow of Services Sektor Kesehatan ASEAN Terhadap Kesiapan Menghadapi Pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Kebijakan Kesehatan Indonesia: JKKI, 9(3), 158-166.
Archana, V. (2020). Does Trade Liberalization Improve Public Health? The Effect of Free Trade Agreements and Multilateralism in Pharmaceutical Sector in India. International Journal of Health Services, 50(2), 137-146.
Dananjaya, A. N. D., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Suryani, L. P. (2019). Sanksi malpraktik dan resiko medik yang dilakukan oleh dokter. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 1(1), 6-10.
Hadi, I. G. A. A. (2018). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Pertanggungjawaban Dokter terhadap Tindakan Malpraktik Medis. Jurnal Yuridis, 5(1), 98-133.
Hatta, M. (2018). The position of expert witnesses in medical malpractice cases in Indonesia. Al-Ahkam, 28(1), 47-72.
Hidayati, N., Almasdy, D., & Putra, A. S. (2021). Global trade and health: an Indonesian perspective on the asean medical device directive policy. Berita Kedokteran Masyarakat, 37(1), 1-6.
Johan, B. (2005). Doctor's Accountability Health Law. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Kis-Katos, K., Pieters, J., & Sparrow, R. (2018). Globalization and social change: Gender-specific effects of trade liberalization in Indonesia. IMF Economic Review, 66(4), 763-793.
Koto, I., & Asmadi, E. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Terhadap Tindakan Malpraktik Tenaga Medis di Rumah Sakit. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi, 4(2), 181-192.
Manuputi, A. (2019). Kajian Hukum Internasional Terhadap Liberalisasi Perdagangan di Bidang Jasa oleh Negara-Negara ASEAN Melalui AFAS. Yure Humano, 3(2), 1-20.
Naya, A. Z. (2020). The Liberalization of the Law on Resources: The Case Study of the Health Sector Liberalization in the Post-Reformation Era. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(8), 7453-7458.
Notoatmodjo, S. (2010). Etika dan Hukum Kesehatan. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Riza, R. A. (2018). Tanggung Jawab Dokter terhadap Pasien dalam Hal Terjadinya Malpraktik Medik Dilihat dari Perspektif Hukum Perdata. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 4(1), 1-8.
Simamora, T. P., Batubara, S. A., Napitupulu, I. E., & Sitorus, R. T. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pasien dalam Pelayanan Medis di Rumah Sakit Umum. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 12(2), 270-279.
Suryadhimartha, R. (2011). Hukum Malapraktik Kedokteran Disertai Kasus dan Penyelesaiannya. Yogyakarta: Total Media.
Susila, M. E. (2021). Medical Malpractice System in the United States of America: Lesson to Learn for Indonesia. Yuridika, 36(2), 367-382.
Sutarno, S., & Maryati, M. (2021). Information of Medical Malpractice and Risks in The Informed Consent Process Before Surgery in Indonesia. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 10(2), 269-290.
Syauf, A., & Haiti, D. (2021). Application of Restorative Justice Values in Settling Medical Malpractice Cases. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10(1), 103-110.
Tongat, T. (2020). The Criminal Liability of Doctors in the Case of Malpractice in Indonesia. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 14(2).
Vatikawa, A., & Amnawaty, A. (2018). Medical record data counterfeiting by doctors in Indonesia reviewed from the ethics, discipline, and legal aspects. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12(3), 224-233.