Constitutionality Of Implementing Asymmetric Lockdown (Regional Quarantine) When Covid-19 Increases to Accelerate Health Emergency Management

The constitution is the basis for all the space for a country to move, whether the country is in normal or abnormal conditions. It based on the constitution as the basic norm that is the highest guideline for a country. In the case of an abnormal state, Posner explains that there is flexibility needed to deal with abnormal conditions in the constitution. Indonesia declared the country's status in a health emergency based on Presidential Decree Number 11 of 2020 on the Determination of a Corona Virus Disease Public Health Emergency and Government Regulation In Lieu Of Law Number 1 of 2020 on State Financial Policy and Financial System Stability for Handling the Corona Virus Disease (Covid-19) Pandemic and/or In Facing Threats That Endanger the National Economy and/or Financial System Stability that cause the economy to decline and conflict in society. The government is faced with policy choices in dealing with this Covid. In Indonesia, the real meaning of lockdown is regional quarantine. The area quarantine itself is regulated in Law Number 6 of 2018 on Health Quarantine (Health Quarantine Law). Although Indonesia has been able to adapt to Covid-19, it is possible that in the future there will be a genetic mutation of this virus, causing an increase in the spread of Covid-19. Therefore, before there is a spike in Covid-19 in the future, it must be clear in the division of


INTRODUCTION
The constitution is the basis for all the space for a country to move, whether the country is in normal or abnormal conditions. This is based on the understanding that the constitution is the basic norm that is the highest guideline for a country. U.S. Judge Richard Posner once said, "A constitution that will not bend will break". In the case of an abnormal state, Posner explains that there is flexibility needed to deal with abnormal conditions in the constitution. As for certain corridors, the absolute presidential authority mentioned above can be said to be a concept of constitutional dictatorship, as stated by Carl Smith that a leader may make extraordinary policies when his country is under threat, which creates an urgent need to save the sovereignty of a country. However, such behaviour must be limited through certain corridors as stated by Herman Sihombing that the emergency is only temporary until the emergency is deemed no longer dangerous (Arsil & Ayuni, 2020).
In handling COVID-19, the Indonesian government However, the legal politics raised criticism everywhere, the regulations were considered late to be issued, as a result of the delay both the Central Government and Regional Governments experienced stuttering in taking steps to overcome the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak. Likewise, with Perppu No. 1 of 2020 related to the policy of financial system stability. At first glance, this policy seems "positive" and is seen as a way to save state finances, as well as allow changes to the APBN budget allocation for the costs of dealing with the COVID-19 outbreak". However, in terms of its own substance, Perppu No. 1 of 2020 contains legal problems, which have the potential to create moral hazard, fraud and corruption where every action or decision taken by officials  (Kurniawan, 2021). Of course, it would be very unfortunate if the government actually took steps to maneuver legal politics that were counterproductive to efforts to protect the people's right to health from the COVID-19 pandemic. The President's policy in the form of the stipulation of Perppu Number 1 of 2020 did not receive full support from all Indonesian people, but instead received opposition and criticism from various groups. For example, the existence of Article 27 which is considered to provide legal immunity (immunity) to officials so that it is contrary to Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution, Article 7A of the 1945 Constitution, and even the Anti-Corruption Law (Tigor et al., 2020).
When referring to the current conditions, the spread of the Covid. In Indonesia, the real meaning of lockdown is regional quarantine. The area quarantine itself is regulated in Law Number 6 of 2018 on Health Quarantine (Health Quarantine Law). Territorial Quarantine itself is a limitation on the population in an area including the entrance area and its contents suspected of being infected with disease and/or contaminated in such a way as to prevent the possibility of spreading disease or contamination.
However, Indonesia has yet to implement a lockdown (regional quarantine). Several efforts have been made by the government, starting from the PSBB, the implementation of the new normal, to PPKM with levels 1-4. Regarding these various policy transitions which later became the basis when the Covid-19 response was completed by the central government, like PPKM, the handling of Covid-19 was not optimal, which led to an increase in the spread of Covid-19 and a decline in the country's economy (Tuwu, 2020). As of October 25, 2021, Indonesia has reported 4,240,479 positive cases, ranking first in the most in Southeast Asia. In terms of mortality, Indonesia ranks third in Asia with 143,235 deaths (Worldometer, 2021). To understand the various models of regional restrictions, see Table 1. In Table 1 shows that the implementation of regional quarantine has a lower risk of spreading COVID-19. In addition,   If referring to Law Number 23 of 2014 on regional government, health matters are the authority of the region (concurrent government affairs). But on the other hand, the central government is in control of the handling of Covid-19. Even though each region has its own typology and features that are different from other regions. So far, the concept of the division of authority is based on the principle of decentralization which requires that the regions have autonomy in regulating regional affairs. Decentralization produces regional government, there occurs "...a superior government -one encompassing a large jurisdictionassigns responsibility, authority, or function to "lower" government unit -one cencompassing a smaller jurisdiction -that is assumed to have some degree of autonomy" (Zahrotunnimah, 2020). On the other hand, Article 18 paragraph (2) and paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution has emphasized that regional governments can manage their own regions based on the principles of autonomy and assistance tasks.
This autonomy is carried out as widely as possible, The current problem related to regional autonomy is that when a country is declared a health emergency, namely Covid-19, then all affairs in the regional government to deal with Covid-19 are directly determined by the president (Prasetio, 2021). Whether from the determination of the implementation of regional quarantine or not. On the other hand, the region has the widest possible autonomy.
Autonomy which has the nature of independence from lower government to regulate and manage some governmentaffairs. When the country is in a state of  (Satgas Coid-19, 2021). It means that placing regional governments in handling Covid-19 will be much more effective and efficient. Because regions will know the conditions best, both in terms of socio-cultural, economic, and mobilization. Effectiveness in decision making in the area is supported by an understanding of decentralization should allow government programs to be completed more quickly, by granting greater authority for regional governments in decision-making, allowing them to bypass the procedure sluggish which is often associated with centralized administration (Fatmawati, 2018). Especially in a health emergency, all handling of the Covid-19 response requires quick action to save public health.
The condition of each region that has different characteristics from one another cannot be generalized to a certain degree so that it has an impact on the decentralization format developed by a country. The decentralization format that overgeneralizes (homogeneous symmetric decentralization) is often the choice of a country in carrying out its regional government management because it makes it easier for the central government to control the regions, but sometimes it often gets into trouble because it is too forced even though it is not according to needs, in the end it cause inefficiency (Hanifa & Fisabilillah, 2021). Given these limitations, the heterogeneous (asymmetric) decentralization format can be used as an alternative policy in overcoming the limitations. Therefore, this article is intended to conduct a study on how the constitutionality of the asymmetrical lockdown (regional quarantine) in the Covid-19 situation has increased.
Although Indonesia has been able to adapt to Covid-19, it is possible that in the future there will be a genetic mutation of this virus, causing an increase in the spread of Covid-19. Therefore, before there is a spike in Covid-19 in the future, it must be clear in advance the concept of the division of authority both in the central government and regional governments regarding the lockdown (regional quarantine).

METHOD
This research uses normative law research . This research is a normative case study, one of which is to examine the law. The main subject of normative research is law which is conceptually a norm or rule that applies in society and becomes a reference for people's behavior. The use of this normative research method seeks to make the writing of this research based on the suitability of the theory with the methods needed in writing. In this study, there are several approaches with which researchers are trying to obtain information from aspects regarding government policies in dealing with the Covid-19 outbreak which are currently trying to find answers. The method used is the approach of legislation (statue aproac ) and (Conseptual Approach) which is associated also with the country's constitution.

A. The Asymmetric Implementation of Lockdown When the Covid-19 Increases is a Constitutional Mandate in Carrying Out the Widest Autonomy.
Regional autonomy is a large subsystem of a larger system, namely the national government system. As a large Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia which regulates autonomy shows that it is a major subsystem in the Indonesian government system. The article above mandates that the region has an important role in supporting this large subsystem. So that the regions have the autonomy to make appropriate regional policies in any situation. In line with Kaho's perspective, regional autonomy is simply a " self rule " or " self-government ". Where Kaho defines autonomy as having the right/power/authority independently in managing their own area (Pratiwi et al., 2020).
This authority in addition to containing the meaning of 'laws' (regeling) also means 'government' (bestuur) (Elcaputera, 2021). It means that the implementation of autonomy has its own level of discretion as long as it still supports large subsystems, especially in a unitary state like Indonesia. This rationale shows that the widest possible autonomy in the practice of state administration in Indonesia can be interpreted very broadly, including in terms of health emergencies, especially regarding the increasing number of the COVID-19 cases. Regarding in handling and overcoming these conditions requires quick action from the government. Therefore, the implementation of autonomy in a unitary state is the key to success in speeding up the handling of COVID-19. Currently, regional governments have difficulty in carrying out such autonomy because there is a limitation meaning of autonomy.
This authority in addition to containing the meaning of 'laws' (regeling) also means 'government' (bestuur). This means that the implementation of autonomy has its own level of discretion as long as it still supports large Autonomy also contains an element of supervision, where concerns about the misuse of power will be controlled through supervision. Therefore, when the right to autonomy is exercised, it must be accompanied by the limits contained in the legislation. However, if the practice of handling the Covid-19 outbreak, it still requires the Regional Government to follow and justify the policies of the Central Government which experience ambivalence in the juridical order. So indirectly the Regional Government has been trapped in a constellation of centralized government with a deconcentration mechanism and only makes regional heads or regional governments, as representatives of the central government in the regions. Because in truth, deconcentration is not a principle in the administration of regional government, but a way of carrying out central government affairs in the regions.
Therefore, deconcentration cannot be institutionalized as part of the local government system which is the antithesis of centralization. The context of the rejection of centralization contained in the deconcentration mechanism is also the basis for changes to the current orientation of regional autonomy. The atmosphere of kebatinan (geistlichen hintergrund) amendments to Article 18 of the 1945 Constitution by adopting decentralization also strengthened when there was a desire for regions to escape from the centralization of the Central Government. That when (before the reform) the regions tried to develop a decentralized system and were deemed not in line with the policies of the central government, the subversive threats with security approaches and the pretext of national interests had triggered injustice and even the threat of disintegration of the nation (Penyusun, 2010 regional autonomy is a necessity in the current implementation of local government. The authority of the Regional Government and the relationship between the Central Government in the spirit of decentralization is also interpreted as the basis for deliberation on the framework of state governance, the maintenance and development of the principles of original government, and the basis of the rule of law (Wadi, 2020).
The contextualization of the decentralization scheme becomes logical when the basis of the rule of law is the legitimacy of the authority of the Regional Government in determining Lockdown in order to alleviate or become a scheme in fulfilling legal certainty in handling the Covid-19 outbreak amid ambiguous policies carried out by the Central Government. The orientation of the spirit of decentralization is also well-organized in the legal politics of regional government at the national and regional levels. The legal politics of regional government which is national in nature is closely related to the function of public services in order to realize social justice, general welfare, and prosperity of the local people in the form of a social security, health, social development such as people's economic empowerment with MSMEs and cooperatives. This is also interpreted juridically as a concurrent government affair which is legalized in the Law on Regional Government.
Although the main policies are still guided by those set by the Central Government, awareness of Regional Governments to prevent escalation of Central Government centralization because setting policies that create legal uncertainty is a necessity, especially in handling Covid-19.
Departing from this, the dimension of regional autonomy has confirmed the mechanism. Quoting what Jimly Asshiddiqie stated, that the practical paradigm of regional autonomy is not only having an ideal conception of the transfer of central authority to be regulated by the regions autonomously. However, there is also a need for initiatives originating from the regions to the Central Government, in order to encourage the implementation of regional autonomy (Wadi, 2020), and ensure that the implementation of regional autonomy is successfully carried out within the framework of the Unitary State.
Therefore, when the Regional Government establishes the Lockdown mechanism in handling the Covid-19 outbreak, it is a form of initiative or response from the Regional Government in alleviating the centralized nature of the Central Government due to policies that create legal uncertainty. Currently, regional governments have difficulty in carrying out such autonomy because there is a narrowing of the meaning of autonomy. This limitation meaning is contained in the Health Quarantine Law, in which the regional government waits for a response and approval from the central government in terms of handling COVID-19, including determining the lockdown (regional Therefore, Indonesia declared itself in a state of emergency. Referring to the explanation above, when the country is declared in a state of emergency, the regions can automatically carry out any activities in dealing with emergency conditions, including implementing a regional quarantine (lockdown) constitutionally. Because the regions have the authority to carry out the widest possible autonomy. It is based on Article 18 paragraph (2) and paragraph (5)  (three) well-known teachings regardingthe content and extent of regional households, namely: (i) the teaching of material household (material huishoudingbegri) in this system there is a division of tasks between the central and regional governments which is clearly specified in the law (ii) formal household rules (formele huishoudingbegrip) in this system the relationship between the center and the regions is not detailed (iii) house teachings real ladder, this system wants harmonization between tasks and capabilities and strengths, both within the (internal) region itself and with the central government (Lekipiouw, 2020).
This concept is contained in Article 18 paragraph (5) , 2021). It means that the constitution has legitimized the authority of the regional government based on the principle of autonomy to regulate the region for the prosperity of the region. Moreover, no one really knows the condition of the area except the regional government itself. This means that currently there are developments towards the expansion of the meaning of autonomy, one of which is autonomy in the case of health emergencies. This constitutionality space then becomes the basis for regional governments to implement an asymmetrical lockdown (regional quarantine) in order to accelerate and additionally overcome the COVID-19 pandemic (Prasetio, 2021).

B. Asymmetrical Lockdown Implementation is More Effective in Overcoming the Increase in Covid-19
Lockdown is actually an extension of social distancing, which covers certain areas and territories. If an area or region has experienced a lockdown, it means closing the entrances and exits for the community. Not surprisingly, in some reports, this lockdown policy has been taken into consideration by several local regional officials. These considerations are based on budget readiness and the social impacts that arise (Yunus & Rezki, 2020 In the context of handling the Covid-19 pandemic, refer to Law Number 23 of 2014 on Regional Government in Article 12 paragraph (1) point b, it is explained that the health sector is a concurrent government affair in accordance with Article 11 paragraph (1). In a sense, concurrent government affairs are government affairs that are divided between the central government and provincial and district/city governments (Article 9 paragraph (3) of the Regional Government Law). Based on this, the regions (provinces, districts/cities) have the right of autonomy (freedom) to regulate their respective regions (Kusumaputra & Retnowati, 2020). In this case, the region can also draw up its own legal product, which applies specifically to their region in the form of a regional regulation. Although each region has the freedom to regulate its regional household affairs, in the context of the relationship between the Central Government and the Regional Government, it is still necessary to have a form of guidance and supervision.
However, the supervision carried out must be carried out in a balanced manner. If the form of supervision carried out by the Central Government is too tight, it will actually impede the existence of decentralization and autonomy.
By referring to the provisions above, within the framework of autonomy and decentralization, it can indeed lead to a dualism of interpretation. First, in the case of a health emergency, the Regional Government can determine the attitude or steps to deal with the spread of a disease outbreak, it is possible to establish a lockdown policy. Thus, if an interpretation is carried out using the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali (the Health Quarantine Law is a more specific law, while the Regional Government Law is a more general law), then of course the authority to establish a lockdown policy for health emergencies is carried out by the central government. is not under the jurisdiction of the regional government. However, in the context of handling a disease outbreak, it is necessary to examine whether or not the authority to establish a lockdown policy rests with the central government.
Referring to the living law theory of Eugen Ehrlich ) that the law always lives and develops in line with the needs of society, it was born and continues to grow in society. Thus, if the norms contained in a law are not in accordance with the development and needs of the community, then the law should be reformed.
In an effort to realize the effectiveness of overcoming the Covid-19 pandemic, it is very important to use a decentralized institution that uses the principle of subsidiarity (Lele, n.d.). It means that there is an emphasis on the importance of dealing with the problem from the point closest to the problem, namely by carrying out an asymmetrical lockdown by handing over the authority to set a lockdown to the regional government as the entity closest to the Covid-19 pandemic problem and as an entity that knows more about social characteristics and culture in the area. Moreover, this was further strengthened by referring to the Constitutional Court's decision Number 8/PUU-XII-2014 which stated in its legal considerations that the regional governments are considered to be the most knowledgeable in terms of real conditions in their regions compared to the central government.
The enactment of laws and regulations by the center on regional areas that have their own characteristics is an asymmetric (non-uniform) delegation of authority (decentralization). Asymmetric autonomy is another name for asymmetric decentralization in which special powers are given by the central government in a country, so they are not given to other regions. The term asymmetric decentralization is given to areas where the level of separatism is quite high, in that context Van Houten defines special autonomy as follows: "The legal authority given to special groups of people who do not have sovereignty, or ethnically special areas, make basic public decisions and implement policies. public freely outside the source of state authority, but still subject to the law of the country as a whole" (Nurfurqon, 2020).
Refers to the concept of regional autonomy itself, the concept of regional autonomy which is restrictly defined as the exclusive rights granted to regions in relation to making decisions regarding their own regions. This right is obtained through the transfer of government affairs from the central government to the regional governments in a decentralized system. In short, decentralization is the transmission of the The point that can be taken into account is point 3, namely that decentralization can be used as a system to create responsiveness to local interests and affairs. Local affairs in question are handling the spread of the virus in their respective regions, so that if the context sought is to suppress the spread of the virus, then the spread must be suppressed from the smallest level in regional units coordinated by the center, not the other way around. So that if the authority to carry out regional quarantine is given to the regions, of course it will greatly make the handling more effective. In line with the opinion expressed by Eric Barendt, the aim of decentralization is to make decisions according to local needs and conditions. So that autonomy is a derivative of decentralization, namely the higher the degree of decentralization, the higher the level of regional autonomy.
In other words, the more you are at the lowest level of government, the better the management and handling of existing problems (crises) will be.
In addition, taking into account that the geographical and demographic aspects of Indonesia are so vast in area, physically so complex, with thousands of islands and ethnicities, of course, requires a policy-making that can be adapted to the character of each region. Because regional government is the foremost system in responding to the aspirations of local people, supportive of national policies and responsive to global trends, thus the lockdown policy making by regional governments is expected to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of implementing government functions, democratization at the grassroots level (level the most basic), and the most important thing is the effectiveness of overcoming the Covid-19 pandemic (Ismail, 2021).
The differences in socio-cultural characteristics as mentioned above can be seen from several things, such as the level of the economy, education, to the influence of customs and beliefs of the local community. For example, with regard to customs and community beliefs, of course the influence of customs and community beliefs in rural areas of Indonesia will be different from those in big cities (BBC, 2021) likewise, the level of technological literacy from one region to another will also be different (Burhan, 2021). So that differences in socio-cultural characteristics between regions will certainly greatly affect the success in overcoming the Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, each region requires a different approach, so it is the right thing to implement an asymmetrical lockdown policy, namely by placing the regional government in the most central position in tackling the Covid-19 pandemic in order to realize the effectiveness of overcoming the Covid-19 pandemic.

C. The Implementation of Regional Quarantine (Lockdown) is the Responsibility of the State Distributed in Local Governments in Protecting Public Health
Referring to the obligation of the state to fulfill the right to health, it is described in Article 2. 1 of the ICESCR (World The presence of the state here, which is none other than the central government, of course, as a facilitator in terms of optimizing the implementation of asymmetric lockdowns with regard to facilities and infrastructure and also facilitating the reach and efficiency of implementation of asymmetrical lockdowns, especially with regard to coordination. So that if the command is carried out by each region, then the response to the pandemic can be carried out quickly. With regard to the state's obligation to guarantee people's human rights, this is in line with the opinion expressed by John Locke who stated that in the context of human rights, the state exists to serve the interests and fulfill these human rights (Fauzia & Hamdani, 2021a). In addition, in the rule of law theory, it is stated that a state of law or sovereign state must consider aspects of human rights in every action ( Atmaja & Budhiarta, 2018 attribute its failure to meet at least its minimum core obligations to a lack of available resources, it must demonstrate that every effort has been made to use all resources at its disposal in an effort to satisfy, as a priority, those minimum obligations. And at least take advantage of it by guaranteeing in terms of accessibility, according to community needs, adequate facilities and also providing satisfaction to the community. In this quarantine activity, of course, the Central Government and Regional Governments are responsible for protecting public health from diseases or public health risk factors that have the potential to cause a Public Health Emergency (Policy for Enforcement of Lockdown as Anticipation of the Spread of the Corona Virus Covid-19).
However, By looking at the geographical and demographic aspects of Indonesia which are so broad as mentioned in the previous discussion, it will certainly cause limitations for the central government in dealing with the complexity of the problems faced by the community, which in this case is the fulfillment of human rights in the economic and health fields (Hamdani, 2020). The differences in geographical conditions between regions also have an impact on regional economic inequality in Indonesia, which is influenced by the number and growth of the population, the level of population density, education, health, discipline, and work ethic (Djadjuli, 2018).
On the explanation above, through the implementation of an asymmetrical lockdown, a concurrent institutional model will be applied which implements a fusion system between the central government and local governments. This system can be implemented on condition that there is a clear division of labor with a clear sequence (Rusdianto et al., 2022). The aim is to avoid overlapping authorities between the central government and regional governments as well as the attraction of interests between the center and the regions. In this case, when the determination of the lockdown policy is given to the regions, where the central government plays a role in providing guidance and supervision, the central government will be more focused or can be more intense to fulfill the needs of the community, especially in terms of economy and health which will be based on the needs of each individual in each area. It means that there is a clear division of labor between the central and regional governments, that the regional government is focused on tackling the Covid-19 pandemic as an entity that is closer to the Covid-19 problem in the regions (Fauzia & Hamdani, 2021b), while the central government can be more optimal in seeking to fulfill the economic and public health aspects. such as the procurement of vaccines and other health facilities.
Some of the government's concerns regarding the implementation of the lockdown include in terms of implementation time and in terms of costs (Kattsoff et al., 2022). First, in terms of time, the implementation of the lockdown quarantine is sufficient for 14 days or two weeks. Yudhistira, the scenario and estimate of the funds needed by the government if the lockdown decision is taken, by taking the example of lockdown in Jakarta and then assuming a Jakarta lockdown , per day is IDR 550 billion. Thus, a 2-week lockdown will cost IDR 7.7 trillion (Masitoh, 2021). Jakarta as the centralized center of government and business center plays an important role in national finance, where almost 70% of the national money circulation is controlled by the capital city of Jakarta. In this case, Bima Yudhistira stated that the cost of a national-scale lockdown was around 11-25 trillion in a span of 14 days. It is assessed that Bima will still be able to grow and restore Indonesia's national economy by 3% to 4.5% (TV, 2021).
In the basic concept of a welfare law state or what is also known as a legal state with a modern concept (material meaning), that the state is not only responsible for security and order, but which is primarily related to welfare (ELVIANDRI, 2019). What is meant by welfare above is not only limited to welfare in the sense of fulfilling the economy, but also the right to health (Fauzia & Hamdani, 2021c). Therefore, within the framework of optimizing the fulfillment of community needs, the presence of the central government and local governments should be within the ideal corridor in carrying out their respective functions. The optimization will be achieved if the responsibility for determining the area quarantine is handed over to the regions, because the local government is a street level bureaucrat or organizational unit that is directly related to the community (Ismail, 2021). Then efforts in terms of fulfilling welfare and national economic recovery can be carried out by the central government.
Regional governments with their authority and urgency in their regions indeed know better what their regions need, and can take policies that are deemed necessary for their regions (Putrianji, 2021), so that regional governments basically have the responsibility to determine regional quarantine without dependent on the central In addition, from the point of view of regional autonomy, the emphasis or main focus of autonomy is not on the number of regional affairs but on the freedom/authority of the regional government (independence) to regulate and manage interests in accordance with the real conditions of the region. So it is impossible for the central government to directly handle the affairs in detail because the conditions of each region are dynamic and complex (Nurbaningsih, 2019).
Although theoretically it can be justified that the implementation of regional quarantine should ideally be the responsibility of the state distributed in local governments in protecting public health, but at the legislative level, improvements need to be made so that there is no debate and conflict of authority between the central government and local governments regarding who is in charge. in determining regional quarantine. Because the embodiment of these legal norms basically must be in accordance with the spirit of the nation and the national interest, namely to realize welfare for the community, both from a health and social perspective (Fauzia et al., 2021).

CONCLUSION
That the implementation of lockdown or regional quarantine when the Covid-19 case increases asymmetrically is a form of implementation of the broadest meaning of autonomy which is directly mandated by the constitution. The constitution has a clear basis for regional governments to enforce regional quarantine as a form of government responsibility in protecting public health. In addition, the authority of the autonomous region in terms of a health emergency will accelerate the response to COVID-19, because regions have different socio-cultural characteristics and anthropological conditions that will certainly greatly affect success in overcoming the Covid-19 pandemic. Therefore, each region requires a different approach, so it is the right thing to implement an asymmetrical lockdown policy, namely by placing the regional government in the most central position in tackling the Covid-19 pandemic in order to realize the effectiveness of overcoming the Covid-19 pandemic. When the regional quarantine is implemented, all the needs of the community will be borne by the regional government and the central government. This application is also limited by a certain period of time so that the community has certainty in dealing with this regional quarantine, so that people do not have to worry about meeting basic needs during an asymmetrical quarantine, because it is the government's obligation.

DECLARATION OF CONFLICTING INTERESTS
Author Puji is in charge of collecting data and research, Author Ana is in charge of summarize and finishing, Author C is in charge of analyzing the data and editing 6. FUNDING None