Polemik Gratifikasi Seks di Lingkup Pejabat Negara ditinjau dari Perspektif Normatif Hukum Pidana

  • Alika Ayu Lestari Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Dejan Abdul Hadi Universitas Negeri Semarang
Keywords: Gratifikasi Seks, Hukum Pidana, Kajian Normatif, Pejabat Negara, Korupsi

Abstract

Corruption is white collar crime as an act which has dynamisation. Discourses related to the corruption will always be a hot issue in every country, so that the corruption likes cultivated. Corruption is like a crime that calculative carried out by them who as educated and cultured communities. One of the dynamisation, in its development motive, is gratification. Inspired of that definition, there are so many substances of the meaning or interpretation that expanding the new acts that can be called as gratification acts. One of the new phenomenon case of gratification is sexual gratification, this case regarded as controversial case because there’s no specific law that can be charged this case. In the Article 12B Law Number 31 in 1999 juncto Law Number 20 in 2001 about Corruption, gratification that means giving extra fee, gift in form of money, goods, discount, loan commision without any interest, trip ticket, housing facility, tour trip, free medication, and other facilities. The other substance meanings that implied are multiple interpretation meanings which have no clear elements on it. Shortly, according to the writers, sexual gratification motive hasn’t been specifically regulated yet in the law that causes many officials do a corruption by receiving or giving a sexual gratification which is separated from the elements of gratification as the corruption, so that, according to the writerss opinion, it’s needed specific formulation about sexual gratification in the Corrupytion Law with more strict sanction against the perpetrator of sexual gratification, because his act already harm the dignity nation and the dignity of this country by immoral deed and needed the social sanction for the perpetrator.

References

Buku
Adami Chazawi. (2002). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bag. 1, Raja Grafido Persada, Jakarta.
Reksodiputro Mardjono, (1998). Kemajuan Pembangunan Ekonomi dan Kejahatan, Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan dan Pengabdian UI, Jakarta.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, Memahami Untuk Membasmi; Buku Saku Untuk Memahami Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Kristian dan Yopi Gunawan. (2015). Tindak Pidana Korupsi Kajian terhadap Harmonisasi antara Hukum Nasional dan The United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), Cet.1,Refika Aditama, Bandung
Kristian dan Yopi Gunawan. (2015). Tindak Pidana Korupsi Kajian terhadap Harmonisasi antara Hukum Nasional dan The United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), Cet.1,Refika Aditama, Bandung.
Moeliono Anton M. Moeliono dkk. (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Balai Pustaka, Jakarta.

Jurnal
Al’ Adl, Volume VI Nomor 11, Januari-Juni 2014 ISSN 1979-4940 9 PENAFSIRAN HUKUM OLEH HAKIM DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN DI INDONESIA Afif Khalid
Mertokusumo Sudikno, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty,. Yogyakarta, halaman1 35
Harahap M.Yahya, 2006, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali: Edisi Kedua, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, halaman 273
Sasangka Hari dan Rosita Lily. 2003. Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana, Bandung: Mandar Maju, halaman 10


Internet
http://repository.unpas.ac.id/33686/1/10.%20BAB%20II.pdf diakses pada tanggal 13/03/2019
https://aclc.kpk.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Buku-Pendidikan-Antikorupsi-di-Perguruan-Tinggi.pdf
https://tirto.id/gratifikasi-seks-kerap-terjadi-kenapa-kpk-sulit-membuktikan-dfGV
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK), Pedoman Pengendalian Gratifikasi, hlm 11 dikutp dari https://www.kpk.go.id/gratifikasi/BP/Pedoman_Pengendalian_Gratifikasi.pdf.
Uhat ketentuan Pasal 66 UU No. 8Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-undang HukumAcara Pidana (KUHAP. Lihat juga uraian mengenai prinsip ini pada tulisan Darwan Prinst. 2002. Hukum Acara Pidana dalam Praktek. Cetakan Ketiga (edisi revlsi). Jakarta; Penerbit Djambatan bekerjasama dengan YLBHI. Hlm. 20
http://www.pnlhoksukon.go.id//media/files/2017061413092611035007145940d3161beaa_20170614131921_Pembuktian+Pidana.pdf diakses 18/03/2019
https://tirto.id/gratifikasi-seks-kerap-terjadi-kenapa-kpk-sulit-membuktikan-dfGV
Published
2019-06-19
How to Cite
Lestari, A. A., & Hadi, D. A. (2019). Polemik Gratifikasi Seks di Lingkup Pejabat Negara ditinjau dari Perspektif Normatif Hukum Pidana. Seminar Nasional Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang, 5(01), 65-82. https://doi.org/10.15294/snh.v5i01.29704