Cybercrime Case Item Transaction Fraud in DotA Game 2

Article Sidebar

Full Text (English)
Published May 31, 2021
DOI https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v7i1.43189

Main Article Content

Anang Satriani Surya Pranata
Indonesian Law and Technology Literacy Society (Masyarakat Melek Hukum dan Teknologi Indonesia)

Abstract

The DotA 2 Coommunity is known for the largest gamers community in the entire worlds and there is no secrets that this community hub is going bigger and bigger, why this is always expanding is because the game itself offer a complex gameplay with such a huge diversity for the player to explore and enjoy the experience, and the one that this community love most is the microtransacsion in this game that provide the item in game of DotA 2. The value of this item is more and more provitable because the growth of its community and thats make some criminals spread their hand in this community by doing a cybercrime such a scamming, fraud seller and buyer and a hacker that hack someone DotA 2 account that have a provitable account.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pranata, A. S. S. (2021). Cybercrime Case Item Transaction Fraud in DotA Game 2. Law Research Review Quarterly, 7(2), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v7i1.43189
Issue
Vol 7 No 2 (2021): L. Research Rev. Q. (May 2021) "Dimensions of Legal Certainty in Transnational and Cybercrimes"
Section
RESEARCH ARTICLE

All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) are retain the copyrights of the Article. However, before publishing, it is required to obtain written confirmation from Author(s) in order to ensure the originality (Author Statement of Originality). The statement is to be signed by at least one of the authors who have obtained the assent of the co-author(s) where applicable.This work licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

References

Arifah, D. A. (2011). Kasus Cybercrime di Indonesia. Jurnal Bisnis dan Ekonomi, 18(2), 185-195.

Dep.Kominfo. (2007). Menuju Kepastian Hukum di Bidang: Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Jakarta: Dirjen Aplikasi Telematika.

Golose, P. R. (2006). Perkembangan Cybercrime dan Upaya Penanganannya di Indonesia oleh Polri. Buletin Hukum Perbankan, 4(2).

Hamzah, A. (1990). Aspek-aspek Pidana di Bidang Komputer. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Irfan, M. (2018). Tindak Pidana Penipuan Daring dalam Jual Beli Item DoTA 2 Melalui Internet. Thesis. Banda Aceh: Universitas Syiah Kuala.

Kaligis, O. C. (2012). Penerapan Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Dalam Prakteknya. Jakarta: Yarsif Watampone.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Lemuel, Y. (2019). Internet and Crimes: How the Law Responds to Internet Based Crimes? A Book Review of ‘Aspek Hukum Penipuan Berbasis Internet’ Maskun & Wiwik Meilarati, CV Keni Media, Makassar, 2016, 238 Pages, ISBN 978-602-74375-5-5. JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies), 4(2), 343-350. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v4i2.34772.

Mansur, D. M. A., & Gultom, E. (2005). Cyber Law Aspek Hukum Teknologi Informasi. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Mathias, J. (2021). Hate Speech and Its Threat to Law Enforcement. The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/ijicle.v3i1.43172.

Mattinen, T., & Macey, J. (2018, October). Online abuse and age in Dota 2. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Academic Mindtrek Conference (pp. 69-78).

Nugroho, O. S. (2016). Modus Penipuan Transaksi Barang dalam Game Online dan Prospek Penyelesaiannya. Thesis. University of Muhammadiyah Malang.

Pomounda, I. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Penipuan Melalui Media Elektronik (Suatu Pendekatan Viktimologi). Thesis. Tadulako University.

Radjagukguk, E. (2017). Pembaharuan Hukum Memasuki PJPT Kedua dalam Era Globalisasi. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 23(6), 505-526.

Raharjo. A. (2008). Cyber Crime: Pemahaman dan Upaya Pencegahan Kejahatan Berteknologi. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Rahman, M. A. (2018). One Hundred Thousand, Ended in Misery Five Years. Law Research Review Quarterly, 4(2), 276-283. https://doi.org/10.15294/snh.v4i02.25573.

Republic of Indonesia. (2008). Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Rizki, F. M., & Zaky, M. (2019). Analisis Kriminologis Korban Cyber Fraud Pada Transaksi Game Online Melalui Steam. Anomie, 1(1).

Said, K., & Diniyanto, A. (2021). Determination of Advancement of Technology against Law. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(1), 125-134. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v2i1.44525.

Saputro, H. C. (2020). How Does the Law Solve the Covid-19 Problem?. The Indonesian Journal of International Clinical Legal Education, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.15294/ijicle.v2i3.38418.

Sitompul, A. (2001). Hukum Internet (Pengenalan mengenai Masalah Hukum di Cyberspace). Bandung: Citra Aditya bakti.

Soekanto, S. (2014). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegak Hukum, Jakarta: RajawaliPers.

Tahir, A. (2009). Penegakan Hukum Cybercrime di Indonesia, Thesis. Universitas Gajah Mada.

Utari, I. S., & Arifin, R. (2019). Law Enforcement and Legal Reform in Indonesia and Global Context: How the Law Responds to Community Development?. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 1(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v1i1.35772

Wahid, A., & Labib, M. (2005) Kejahatan Mayaantara (Cybercrime). Bandung: Refika Aditama.