E-Court Paradigm Shift: Problems of Legitimacy Mechanisms of Electronic Evidence in State Administrative Procedure Law
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study on the legitimacy mechanisms of electronic evidence within the State Administrative Procedure Law is intrinsically connected to Indonesia’s ongoing efforts to modernize its legal landscape. The acknowledgment of electronic information and documents as valid evidence aligns with Indonesia’s commitment to adapting its legal framework to the digital era. The legal issues explored within the context of the E-Court paradigm shift resonate with Indonesia's broader initiatives to enhance judicial efficiency and access to justice. As Indonesia grapples with the challenges of incorporating electronic evidence within its administrative procedures, the study sheds light on the specific hurdles faced within the Indonesian legal system. Regulatory complexities and resource constraints resonate with Indonesia’s broader struggle to harmonize its legal infrastructure with the demands of the digital age. Moreover, the study emphasizes the importance of a proportionate mechanism in addressing legitimacy concerns, aligning with Indonesia’s commitment to fostering a fair and balanced legal environment. The conclusion highlighting the critical role of the validation process reflects Indonesia’s dedication to ensuring the integrity and reliability of electronic evidence within the legal proceedings.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All works published in the Indonesian State Law Review are licensed & copyrighted under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
The editorial board of the Indonesian State Law Review shares common vision with Universitas Negeri Semarang as a Publisher in providing unrestricted access to knowledge and education for all and thereby follows Open Access Policy to showcase its content. The Indonesian State Law Review follows open access copyright and licensing policy on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Universitas Negeri Semarang and the Indonesian State Law Review adhere to Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. The authors submitting and publishing in the Indonesian State Law Review agree to the copyright policy under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Under this license, the authors published in the Indonesian State Law Review retain the copyright including publishing rights of their scholarly work and agree to let others remix, tweak, and even build upon their work commercially (for academic, scientific, and common purposes). All other authors using the content of the Indonesian State Law Review are required to cite author(s) and publisher in their work.
References
Alon, Guy, Azmi Haider, and Hagit Hel-Or. "Judicial Errors: Fake Imaging and the Modern Law of Evidence." UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law 21 (2022): 82-120.
Annisa, Nur Fitra. "Peranan Hakim sebagai Penegak Hukum Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman." Lex et Societatis 5, no. 3 (2017): 157-166.
Army, Eddy. Bukti Elektronik dalam Praktik Peradilan. (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2020).
Arshad, Humaira, Aman Bin Jantan, and Oludare Isaac Abiodun. "Digital Forensics: Review of Issues in Scientific Validation of Digital Evidence." Journal of Information Processing Systems 14, no. 2 (2018): 346-376.
Asimah, Dewi. "Menjawab Kendala Pembuktian dalam Penerapan Alat Bukti Elektronik (To Overcome the Constraints of Proof in the Application of Electronic Evidence)." Jurnal Hukum Peratun 3, no. 2 (2020): 97-110.
Bariroh, Siti Washilatul. “Sinergitas E-Court dalam Perwujudan Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Surabaya”. Thesis (Jember: UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, 2023).
Busthami, Dachran. "Kekuasaan Kehakiman dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum di Indonesia." Masalah-Masalah Hukum 46, no. 4 (2017): 336-342.
Casey, Eoghan, and Benjamin Turnbull. "Digital evidence on mobile devices." Digital Evidence and Computer Crime 3 (2011): 1-44.
Contini, Francesco, and Antonio Cordella, “Law and Technology in Civil Judicial Procedures”, In Roger Brownsword (ed.) et al., The Oxford Handbook of Law, Regulation and Technology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 246-268.
Djamaludin, Djamaludin, et al. "Assessing the Impact of Electronic Court Systems on the Efficiency of Judicial Processes in the Era of Digital Transformation." Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi 6, no. 1 (2023): 1-18.
Djatmiko, Hary. "Implementasi Peradilan Elektronik (E-Court) Pasca Diundangkannya Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik." Jurnal Hukum Legalita 1.1 (2019): 22-32.
Fares IS, M. Zhafran. “Kekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti”. Thesis (Jambi: Universitas Jambi, 2022).
Goode, Steven. "The Admissibility of Electronic Evidence." Review of Litigation 29, no. 1 (2009).
Keane, Adrian, and Paul McKeown. The Modern Law of Evidence. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022).
Kharlie, Ahmad Tholabi, and Achmad Cholil. "E-court and e-litigation: The new face of civil court practices in Indonesia." International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology 29, no. 2 (2020): 2206-2213.
Latifiani, Dian, et al. "Reconstruction of E-Court Legal Culture in Civil Law Enforcement." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 7, no. 2 (2022): 441-448.
Lemuel, Yehezkiel. "Internet and Crimes: How the Law Responds to Internet Based Crimes? A Book Review of" Aspek Hukum Penipuan Berbasis Internet", Maskun & Wiwik Meilarati, CV Keni Media, Makassar, 2016, 238 Pages, ISBN 978-602-74375-5-5." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 4, no. 2 (2019): 343-350.
Miftah, Farrah. "Peran Asas Pembuktian Bebas Sebagai Beban Pembuktian Terhadap Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara." Ulil Albab: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin 1, no. 8 (2022): 2675-2682.
Mujiburohman, Dian Aries. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. (Yogyakarta: STPN Press, 2022).
Ningsih, Dwi Wachidiyah, and Hanifatul Hidayah. "Kedudukan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik Pada Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia." Jurnal Pro Hukum 11, no. 1 (2022): 101-107.
Prasetyo, Eko Surya, YA Triana Ohoiwutun, and Halif Halif. "Implikasi Yuridis Kebijakan Formulasi Alat Bukti Elektronik." Lentera Hukum 5, no. 2 (2018): 174-193.
Pratiwi, Sahira Jati, Steven Steven, and Adinda Destaloka Putri Permatasari. "The Application of E-Court as an Effort to Modernize the Justice Administration in Indonesia: Challenges & Problems." Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 2, no. 1 (2020): 39-56.
Putra, Dedi. "A modern judicial system in Indonesia: legal breakthrough of e-court and e-legal proceeding." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 9, no. 2 (2020): 275-297.
Putrijanti, Aju, and Kadek Cahya Susila Wibawa. "The implementation of e-court in administrative court to develop access to justice in Indonesia." Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques 9, no. 1 (2021): 105-109.
Rahayu, Hartoto Suci, and Diana Lukitasari. "The Concept of Corporate Criminal Liability in the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions." IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) 6, no. 1 (2021): 83-92.
Rahman, Kholilur. "Modernisasi Persidangan Perkara Pidana Pasca Diterbitkannya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2020 Tentang Administrasi dan Persidangan Perkara Pidana di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik." Lex Renaissance 6, no. 4 (2021): 705-718.
Republic of Indonesia. Law No. 8 of 1997 concerning Company Documents. (Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 1997).
Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions has been amended by Law Number 19 of 2016. (Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 2016).
Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. (Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 2008).
Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. (Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara, 2014).
Republic of Indonesia. Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019 on Case Administration and Trial Electronically (PERMA No. 1 of 2019).
Retnaningsih, Sonyendah, et al. "Pelaksanaan E-Court Menurut Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik dan E-Litigation Menurut Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri di Indonesia)." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 50, no. 1 (2020): 124-144.
Rezky, Michelle, and Aji Lukman Ibrahim. "Fake Accounts on Social Media as a Criminal Act of Electronic Information Manipulation in Indonesia." Yuridika 37, no. 3 (2022): 615-632.
Rohman, Miftakur. "Modernisasi Peradilan Melalui E-Litigasi dalam Perspektif Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham." MIYAH: Jurnal Studi Islam 16, no. 2 (2020): 288-301.
Rosida, Heni, et al. "The Effectiveness of The Implementation of the e-Court Justice System and The Impact on Administrative Court in Indonesia." Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal 2, no. 2 (2022): 258-272.
Santiadi, Kukuh. "Expanding Access to Justice through E-Court in Indonesia." Prophetic Law Review 1, no. 1 (2019): 75-89.
Sari, Ni Putu Riyani Kartika. "Eksistensi E-Court untuk Mewujudkan Asas Sederhana, Cepat, dan Biaya Ringan dalam Sistem Peradilan Perdata di Indonesia." Jurnal Yustitia 13, no. 1 (2019): 80-100.
Simanjuntak, Enrico. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara: Transformasi & Refleksi. (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021).
Soebiyantoro, Bambang, et al. Praktik dan Wacana Seputar Persidangan Elektronik (E-Litigation) di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. (Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2020).
Sudarsono, Sudarono, Legal Issues Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca Reformasi: Hukum Acara dan E-Court. (Jakarta: Kencana, 2019).
Sudarsono, Sudarsono, and Rabbenstain Izroiel. "Pemeriksaan Alat Bukti Elektronik Pada Persidangan Perkara Perdata dan Tata Usaha." National Journal of Law 3, no. 2 (2020): 353-364.
Suherman, Andi. "Implementasi Independensi Hakim dalam Pelaksanaan Kekuasaan Kehakiman." SIGn Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1 (2019): 42-51.
Sulistiyono, Adi. Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia dalam Teori dan Praktik. (Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2018).
Supandi, Supandi, Modernisasi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 untuk Mendorong Kemajuan Peradaban Hukum Indonesia (Semarang: UNDIP Press, 2019).
Syahrizal, Darda. Hukum Administrasi Negara & Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. (Jakarta: Media Pressindo, 2013).
Triwulan, Titik, Hukum Tata Usaha Negara dan Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia. (Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2016).
Weda, Ni Komang Dewi Novita Indriyani, I. Made Arjaya, and I. Putu Gede Seputra. "Penerapan Asas Hakim Aktif (Dominus Litis) dalam Persidangan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 1/G/2017/PTUN. DPS.)." Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 2, no. 1 (2021): 27-32.
Widyanti, Mira Ade. "Implementasi PERMA NO. 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik Tinjauan Maslahah." Journal of Islamic Business Law 5, no. 2 (2021): 73-88.