Polemic on the Legitimacy of Proof of E-Court Trial at the State Administrative Court (Harmonization of Legal Courts and Information Technology in the Covid-19 Pandemic Era)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Amid the global upheaval caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, this study navigates the challenges presented by the perilous situation, focusing specifically on the transformation of legal proceedings. The pandemic, posing risks to public health, compelled the imposition of widespread restrictions, limiting various community activities and direct interactions. This shift had profound implications for the justice system, prompting a departure from the conventional practice of open and in-person court proceedings. In response to these unprecedented circumstances, the legal arena saw the emergence of online courts, commonly known as e-courts, as an alternative to traditional court setups. The study seeks to critically examine the effectiveness and legitimacy of e-courts during this tumultuous period. Utilizing a literature study method, the research delves into relevant books and literature, emphasizing the collection of data to assess the harmony between legal court proceedings and information technology in the context of the pandemic. The primary goal is to scrutinize the polemics and challenges surrounding the implementation of e-courts, particularly in the State Administrative Court. As the study unfolds, it reveals a nuanced perspective on the harmonization of legal courts and information technology during the Covid-19 pandemic. The discussion extends to the legitimacy of proof in e-court trials, with a specific focus on the State Administrative Court. The analysis underscores the necessity of maintaining a balance between conventional and electronic trial methods to ensure a comprehensive and reliable legal system. In addition, the research contends that despite the convenience offered by e-courts, doubts persist regarding the legitimacy of evidence presented in electronic trials, particularly in the administrative context. The findings contribute valuable insights that can inform future legislative efforts, guiding the harmonization of legal courts and information technology. Ultimately, the study aims to foster the development of a robust legal framework that addresses the polemics surrounding e-court trials, enhancing their legitimacy and efficacy in the ongoing and post-pandemic era.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All works published in the Indonesian State Law Review are licensed & copyrighted under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
The editorial board of the Indonesian State Law Review shares common vision with Universitas Negeri Semarang as a Publisher in providing unrestricted access to knowledge and education for all and thereby follows Open Access Policy to showcase its content. The Indonesian State Law Review follows open access copyright and licensing policy on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Universitas Negeri Semarang and the Indonesian State Law Review adhere to Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. The authors submitting and publishing in the Indonesian State Law Review agree to the copyright policy under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Under this license, the authors published in the Indonesian State Law Review retain the copyright including publishing rights of their scholarly work and agree to let others remix, tweak, and even build upon their work commercially (for academic, scientific, and common purposes). All other authors using the content of the Indonesian State Law Review are required to cite author(s) and publisher in their work.
References
Al Fikry, Ahmad Habib, Muhammad Riyan Afandi, and Dian Latifiani. "National Law Development through Civil Procedure Law Reform as a Manifestation of State Goals during the Covid-19 Pandemic." Lex Scientia Law Review 5, no. 2 (2021): 41-64.
Amir, Latifah. "Pembuktian dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara dan Perkara Pidana." Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambi 6, no. 1 (2015): 1-21.
Anggraeni, RR Dewi. "Wabah Pandemi Covid-19, Urgensi Pelaksanaan Sidang Secara Elektronik." ADALAH 4, no. 1 (2020): 7-12.
Chamdani, Asri Wijayanti. "Critical Analysis about Legal Evidence in Court in the Justice System in Indonesia." Journal of Positive School Psychology 6, no. 2 (2022): 5867-5870.
Fattah, Muhammad Irsyad, Anwar Sadat, and Hasan Basri. "Efektivitas Persidangan Secara Elektronik (E-Litigasi) Pada Masa Pandemi di Pengadilan Agama Polewali." Qisthosia: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum 3, no. 1 (2022): 48-62.
Iswantoro, Wahyu. "Persidangan Pidana Secara Online, Respon Cepat Mengadapi Pandemi Covid-19." Jurnal Hukum dan Bisnis (Selisik) 6, no. 1 (2020): 56-63.
Latifiani, Dian, et al. "Reconstruction of E-Court Legal Culture in Civil Law Enforcement." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 7, no. 2 (2022): 441-448.
Latifiani, Dian. "Human Attitude and Technology: Analyzing a Legal Culture on Electronic Court System in Indonesia (Case of Religious Court)." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 6, no. 1 (2021): 157-184.
lqbal Kalanauri, Zafar. "Electronic Filing System, Virtual Courts & Online Dispute Resolution-Need of the Hour for Pakistan Legal System." International Journal for Electronic Crime Investigation 5, no. 1 (2021): 17-30.
Marshaal, NG, Sri Suatmiati, and Angga Saputra. Hukum Acara Tata Negara Indonesia. (Palembang: Gemilang Press, 2018).
Miftah, Farrah. "Peran Asas Pembuktian Bebas Sebagai Beban Pembuktian Terhadap Putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara." Ulil Albab: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin 1, no. 8 (2022): 2675-2682.
Muni, Abd. "Telaah Perkembangan E-Court di Indonesia (Romantisme Peradilan dan Teknologi Informasi di Era Covid-19)." As-Shahifah: Journal of Constitutional Law and Governance 1, no. 1 (2021): 1-23.
Naichenko, Alona. "E-Evidence And E-Court in the Context of the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Study from Ukraine." Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 4, no. 12 (2021): 163-181.
Ningrum, Valencia Prasetyo, Rasji Rasji, and Yuliya Safitri. "Sistem Pembuktian pada Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia." COMSERVA 2, no. 8 (2022): 1357-1367.
Niswaty, Risma, et al. "Efektivitas Media e-Court di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Makassar." Sawerigading: Journal of Public Administration 1, no. 1 (2022).
Novitasari, Indriyani, Indriati Amarini, and Astika Nurul Hidayah. "Electronic Trial in Criminal Cases During the Covid-19 Pandemic (Study at The Purwokerto District Court)." UMPurwokerto Law Review 2, no. 2 (2021): 163-171.
Nugroho, Dewi Rahmaningsih, and Suteki Suteki. "Membangun Budaya Hukum Persidangan Virtual (Studi Perkembangan Sidang Tindak Pidana via Telekonferensi)." Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 2, no. 3 (2020): 291-304.
Ocarina, Majolica Fae, and Ronaldo Sanjaya. "Eksistensi E-Court untuk Mewujudkan Efisiensi dan Efektivitas Pada Sistem Peradilan Indonesia di Tengah Covid-19." Jurnal Syntax Transformation 2, no. 4 (2021): 496-507.
Prabawati, Tria, Noverman Duadji, and Ita Prihantika. "Efektivitas Penerapan Aplikasi E-Court dalam Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Pelayanan Publik (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Tanjung Karang Kelas 1A)." Jurnal Administrativa 3, no. 1 (2021): 37-51.
Pratiwi, Sahira Jati, Steven Steven, and Adinda Destaloka Putri Permatasari. "The Application of E-Court as an Effort to Modernize the Justice Administration in Indonesia: Challenges & Problems." Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 2, no. 1 (2020): 39-56.
Putra, Dedi. "A modern judicial system in Indonesia: legal breakthrough of e-court and e-legal proceeding." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 9, no. 2 (2020): 275-297.
Putri, Mery Christian, and Erlina Maria Christin Sinaga. "Disrupsi Digital Dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19." Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 10, no. 1 (2021): 79-95.
Putrijanti, Aju. "Prinsip hakim aktif (Domini Litis Principle) dalam Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara." Masalah-Masalah Hukum 42, no. 3 (2013): 320-328.
Razaq, Nur Akmal. "Legalitas Persidangan Daring di Masa Pandemi Covid–19 dalam Pespektif Hukum Pidana." Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian 1, no. 6 (2020): 1227-1230.
Republic of Indonesia. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik. Online at https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/206067/perma-no-1-tahun-2019
Retnaningsih, Sonyendah, et al. "Pelaksanaan E-Court Menurut Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik dan E-Litigation Menurut Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri di Indonesia)." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 50, no. 1 (2020): 124-144.
Retnaningsih, Sonyendah, et al. "Pelaksanaan E-Court Menurut Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik dan E-Litigation Menurut Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri di Indonesia)." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 50, no. 1 (2020): 124-144.
Rosady, Rakyu Swarnabumi R., and Mulida Hayati. "Sistem E-Court dalam Pelaksanaan Peradilan di Indonesia Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19." Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai 6, no. 2 (2021): 125-143.
Rosida, Heni, et al. "The Effectiveness of the Implementation of the e-Court Justice System and the Impact on Administrative Court in Indonesia." Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal 2, no. 2 (2022): 258-272.
Safitri, Dewi, and Bambang Waluyo. "Optimalisasi Kebijakan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Secara Elektronik di Masa Pandemi Covid-19." JUSTITIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora 8, no. 2 (2021): 279-287.
Safitri, Dewi, and Bambang Waluyo. "Tinjauan Hukum Atas Kebijakan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Secara Elektronik di Masa Pandemi Covid-19." National Conference on Law Studies (NCOLS) 2, no. 1 (2020).
Santiadi, Kukuh. "Expanding Access to Justice through E-Court in Indonesia." Prophetic Law Review 1, no. 1 (2019): 75-89.
Septiawan, Bayu. "Penerapan Beban Pembuktian Oleh Hakim dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara." Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 27, no. 1 (2018): 55-73.
Sodik, Azis Ahmad. "Justiciabelen: Penegakan Hukum di Institusi Pengadilan dalam Menghadapi Pandemi Covid-19." Khazanah Hukum 2, no. 2 (2020): 56-64.
Syarifuddin, Muhammad. Transformasi Gigital Persidangan di Era New Normal: Melayani Pencari Keadilan di Masa Pandemi Covid-19." (Jakarta: Imaji Cipta Karya, 2020).
Thaba, Suryani, Hamzah Hamzah, and Sudirman Sudirman. "Efektivitas Pelaksanaan E-Court Semasa Pandemi Covid-19 di Pengadilan Agama Sorong." Muadalah: Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 2 (2021): 1-18.
Widodo, Wahyu, Toebagus Galang, and Sapto Budoyo. "The Effectiveness of the E-Court Management System in Semarang Courts in Semarang City." Information Management and Computer Science 4, no. 1 (2021): 26-30.
Wiyono, Ihsan Tarmizi, Hukum Acara Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016).
Yoesuf, Juliani Paramitha, et al. "Optimization of E-Litigation-Based Trial Implementation as A Strategy to Prevent Bribery and Gratification (Comparatory Study of E-Litigation Implementation in Malaysia and Singapore): Optimalisasi Pelaksanaan Persidangan Berbasis E-Litigasi Sebagai Strategi Pencegahan Suap dan Gratifikasi (Studi Perbandingan Pelaksanaan E-Litigasi di Malaysia dan Singapura)." Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law 16, no. 1 (2024): 36-49.
Yuniar, Vania Shafira, Jihan Syahida Sulistyanti, and Dian Latifiani. "The Court Role in Providing E-court System Education to Community: Post-Enactment of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019." UNIFIKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 1 (2021): 34-42.
Yusandy, Trio. "Kedudukan dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia." Jurnal Serambi Akademica 7, no. 5 (2019): 645-656.