The Legitimacy of Letters as Evidence in the E-Litigation Proof System within the State Administrative Court
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study delves into the legitimacy of employing letters as evidence within the E-Litigation Proof System at the State Administrative Court (PTUN) against the backdrop of the digital 4.0 era’s transformative influence. The Indonesian government's introduction of electronic justice (e-Litigation or e-Courts) marks a significant paradigm shift, fundamentally altering trial procedures at PTUN. Employing a juridical-normative research method with a qualitative nature, this investigation utilizes conceptual and historical approaches to scrutinize the implications of the e-Litigation system. Secondary data sources, encompassing regulations, literature, and relevant documents, form the basis for analyzing the profound changes in courtroom proceedings and their impact on validating documentary evidence. The findings underscore a pivotal transition from traditional to electronic trials, fostering the electronic submission and exchange of documents. However, the implementation of the e-Litigation evidentiary system has sparked discussions, particularly concerning the legitimacy and challenges associated with proving letters as evidence, particularly in the initial stages of the process. This exploration of the legitimacy of letters as evidence within the e-Litigation context contributes significantly to the ongoing discourse on the modernization of legal proceedings. It sheds light on the evolving nature of evidentiary practices in the digital age, specifically within the State Administrative Court. The study thus offers valuable insights into the intersection of technology and justice, providing a nuanced understanding of the complexities surrounding the utilization of electronic evidence in contemporary legal systems.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All works published in the Indonesian State Law Review are licensed & copyrighted under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
The editorial board of the Indonesian State Law Review shares common vision with Universitas Negeri Semarang as a Publisher in providing unrestricted access to knowledge and education for all and thereby follows Open Access Policy to showcase its content. The Indonesian State Law Review follows open access copyright and licensing policy on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Universitas Negeri Semarang and the Indonesian State Law Review adhere to Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License. The authors submitting and publishing in the Indonesian State Law Review agree to the copyright policy under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Under this license, the authors published in the Indonesian State Law Review retain the copyright including publishing rights of their scholarly work and agree to let others remix, tweak, and even build upon their work commercially (for academic, scientific, and common purposes). All other authors using the content of the Indonesian State Law Review are required to cite author(s) and publisher in their work.
References
Andriyani, Elisa Eka. "Analisis Pemberlakuan Pembagian dan Pemisahan Kewenangan di Indonesia (Studi Kepustakaan Terhadap Separated of Powers dan Division of Powers)." SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora 1, no. 4 (2022): 534-540.
Anrova, Yuda, Eman Suparman, and Hazar Kusmayanti. "Proof Power of Authentic Deed Transfer of Land Rights in Legal Perspective of Civil Procedures." Jurnal Hukum Novelty 12, no. 2 (2021): 237-247.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2019).
Ataupah, Andrew Mario Ernesto. "How the Justice Power Post Constitution Amendment? A Review Book" Politik Hukum Kekuasaan Kehakiman Pasca Amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar 1945", Ma'shum Ahmad, Total Media Yogyakarta, 2017, 193 pages, ISBN: 979-1519-25-0." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 6, no. 1 (2021): 237-244.
Berutu, Lisfer. "Mewujudkan Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Dengan e-Court." Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum 5, no. 1 (2020): 41-53.
Bhakti, Teguh Satya. "Politik Hukum dalam Putusan Hakim." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 5, no. 1 (2016): 53-72.
Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna. "Pembaruan Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca-Reformasi di Era Peradilan Elektronik." Jurnal Hukum Peratun 3, no. 2 (2020): 111-126.
Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna. Apa itu Peradilan Elektronik?. (Bogor: Guepedia, 2019).
Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna. Hukum Administrasi dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Era Peradilan Elektronik. (Bogor: Guepedia, 2019).
Budi, Mohammad Wahyu Adji Setio. "Indonesian State System Based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution: A Contemporary Developments." Indonesian Journal of Pancasila and Global Constitutionalism 1, no. 1 (2022): 1-16.
Carolan, Eoin. The New Separation of Powers: A Theory for the Modern State. (Oxford: OUP Oxford, 2009).
Cynthia, Caroline. "Kedudukan dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Sertifikat Ekektronik di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara." Thesis (Bandung: Universitas Parahyangan, 2022).
Djatmiko, Hary. "Implementasi Peradilan Elektronik (E-Court) Pasca Diundangkannya Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik." Jurnal Hukum Legalita 1, no. 1 (2019): 22-32.
Effendi, Maftuh. "Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia Suatu Pemikiran Ke Arah Perluasan Kompetensi Pasca Amandemen Kedua Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 3, no. 1 (2018): 25-36.
Fatkhurochmah, Diyah Ayu, Dedy Nurjatmiko, and Gunarto Gunarto. "Responsibilities of Notaris on Making Authority to Sell Deed Which Contain Power Clause (Case Study of Decision Number 016/G/2014/PTUN. Semarang)." Jurnal Akta 5, no. 2 (2018): 567-572.
Gunadi, Ariawan, and Ibra Fulenzi Amri. "Komparasi Sistem Pemerintahan & Konstitusi Inggris, Republik Rakyat China (RRC) dan Indonesia." Jurnal Serina Sosial Humaniora 1, no. 1 (2023): 41-49.
Gunawan, Andy, and I. Wayan Arthanaya. "Fungsi Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Hukum Acara Tata Usaha Negara." Jurnal Analogi Hukum 1, no. 1 (2019): 28-33.
Gunawan, Novia, and Tjempaka Tjempaka. "Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Tanah Yang Kehilangan Hak Akibat Jual Beli Atas Tanah Yang Pernah Menjadi Objek Sengketa Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara [Legal Protection for Land Buyers Who Lose Rights as a Result of the Sale and Purchase of Land That Was Once an Object of a Dispute in the State Administrative Court]." Notary Journal 1, no. 2 (2021): 116-132.
Gunawan, Novia. "Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Tanah Yang Kehilangan Hak Akibat Jual Beli Atas Tanah Yang Pernah Menjadi Objek Sengketa Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (Contoh Kasus: Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 658 PK/PDT/2017)." Indonesian Notary 3, no. 2 (2021): 762-782.
Habiby, M. Yusuf. "Penerapan Asas Peradilan Cepat Sederhana dan Biaya Ringan dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia." Thesis. (Mataram: Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram, 2020).
Harjiyatni, Francisca Romana, and Suswoto Suswoto. "Implikasi Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan terhadap Fungsi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara." Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 24, no. 4 (2017): 601-624.
Hvasaliia, Anhelina. “Electronic evidence as a means of evidence in commercial and administrative judicial procedure”, Economic Finance Law 1, no. 12 (2021): 8-12.
Iskatrinah, Iskatrinah. "Pergeseran Kompetensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Pasca Diundangkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan." Jurnal Media Komunikasi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan 2, no. 1 (2020): 200-207.
Jaspan, Mervyn Aubrey. "In quest of new law: the perplexity of legal syncretism in Indonesia." Comparative Studies in Society and History 7, no. 3 (1965): 252-266.
Johansyah, Johansyah. "Pembuktian dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara." Solusi 17, no. 3 (2019): 336-357.
Latifiani, Dian. "Human Attitude and Technology: Analyzing a Legal Culture on Electronic Court System in Indonesia (Case of Religious Court)." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 6, no. 1 (2021): 157-184.
Meyrina, Susana Andi. "Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia bagi Masyarakat Miskin atas Penerapan Asas Peradilan Sederhana Cepat dan Biaya Ringan." Jurnal HAM 8, no. 1 (2017): 25-38.
Ningrum, Valencia Prasetyo, Rasji Rasji, and Yuliya Safitri. "Sistem Pembuktian pada Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia." COMSERVA 2, no. 8 (2022): 1357-1367.
Pamungkas, Yogo. "Pergeseran Kompetensi Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara." Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan 3, no. 2 (2020): 339-359.
Panjaitan, Bernat. "Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara (TUN) Pada Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (PTUN)." Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi 3, no. 2 (2015): 1-17.
Patra, Rommy. "Arrangement of Relationship between State Institutions through the Fifth Amendment of the 1945 Constitution in Indonesia." Hasanuddin Law Review 4, no. 1 (2018): 88-102.
Phahlevy, Rifqi Ridlo, and Aidul Fitriciada Azhari. "Pergeseran Paradigma Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia dan Belanda." Arena Hukum 12, no. 3 (2019): 576-591.
Pranoto, Edi. "Asas Keaktifan Hakim (Litis Domini) dalam Pemeriksaan Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara." SPEKTRUM HUKUM 16, no. 2 (2019): 90-101.
Pratiwi, Sahira Jati, Steven Steven, and Adinda Destaloka Putri Permatasari. "The Application of E-Court as an Effort to Modernize the Justice Administration in Indonesia: Challenges & Problems." Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 2, no. 1 (2020): 39-56.
Putra, Dedi. "A Modern Judicial System in Indonesia: Legal Breakthrough of E-Court and E-Legal Proceeding." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 9, no. 2 (2020): 275-297.
Putra, FA Satria. "Problem Eksekutorial Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara." JUSTISI 7, no. 1 (2021): 66-75.
Putra, Gasa Bahar. Eksistensi Asas-Asas Umum Peradilan Yang Baik dalam Praktik Penerapan Persidangan Secara Elektronik di PTUN Makassar (Pasal 5 Ayat (1) Jo. Pasal 6 Ayat (1) dan Pasal 27 PERMA No. 1 Tahun 2019). (Bogor: Guepedia, 2020).
Putra, Maharidawan. "Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial (Tinjauan Terhadap Modernisasi dari Aspek Kemajuan Teknologi)." Morality: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 1 (2018): 47-59.
Putrijanti, Aju. "Prinsip Hakim Aktif (Domini Litis Principle) dalam Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara." Masalah-Masalah Hukum 42, no. 3 (2013): 320-328.
Republic of Indonesia. 1945 Constitution (Undang-Undang Dasar 1945).
Republic of Indonesia. Law Number 2 of 20014 concerning Amendments to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions.
Republic of Indonesia. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik. Available online at https://ecourt.mahkamahagung.go.id/PERMA_01_2019.pdf.
Retnaningsih, Sonyendah, et al. "Pelaksanaan E-Court Menurut Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik dan E-Litigation Menurut Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri di Indonesia)." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 50, no. 1 (2020): 124-144.
Riyanto, HR Benny. "Pembaruan Hukum Nasional Era 4.0." Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 9, no. 2 (2020): 161-181.
Riza, Dola. "Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Menurut Undang-Undang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Undang-Undang Admnistrasi Pemerintahan." Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 3, no. 1 (2018): 85-102.
Rizkiana, Rina Elsa, and Michael Gerry. "The Implementation of Good Governance Concept in Letter Evidence Submission Regulation for E-Litigation Cases." Veteran Law Review 6.1 (2023): 48-60.
Rosida, Heni, et al. "The Effectiveness of The Implementation of the e-Court Justice System and The Impact on Administrative Court in Indonesia." Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal 2, no. 2 (2022).
Santiadi, Kukuh. "Expanding Access to Justice through E-Court in Indonesia." Prophetic Law Review 1, no. 1 (2019): 75-89.
Siboy, Ahmad. "The integration of the authority of judicial institutions in solving general election problems in Indonesia." Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 29, no. 2 (2021): 237-255.
Sudarsono, Sudarsono. "Konsep Peradilan Secara Elektronik di Lingkungan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara." Tanjungpura Law Journal 3, no. 1 (2019): 42-64.
Sun, FuXiong, and Lili Zhou. "Study of Authentication Mechanism of E-evidence in the E-commerce Litigation." 2012 International Conference on Management of e-Commerce and e-Government. IEEE, 2012.
Tiwari, Lokendra Kumar, et al. "Evidentiary usage of e-mail forensics: Real life design of a case." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Intelligent Interactive Technologies and Multimedia. 2010.
Wahyudi, Johan. "Dokumen Elektronik Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Pembuktian di Pengadilan." Perspektif 17, no. 2 (2012): 118-126.
Weda, Ni Komang Dewi Novita Indriyani, I. Made Arjaya, and I. Putu Gede Seputra. "Penerapan Asas Hakim Aktif (Dominus Litis) dalam Persidangan di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (Studi Kasus Putusan No. 1/G/2017/PTUN. DPS.)." Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 2, no. 1 (2021): 27-32.
Wulansari, Safitri Dwi. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Bank Selaku Kreditor Atas Jaminan Berupa Hak Milik Atas TanahYang Sertifikatnya DibatalkanOleh Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara (Studi Kasus: Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Nomor 126/6/2013/PTUN.Surabaya)”. Thesis (Malang: Universitas Brawijaya, 2017).
Yanasmoro Aji, Anjas, and I. Nengah Laba. "Kajian Hukum Sistem Pembuktian dalam Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara." WICAKSANA: Jurnal Lingkungan dan Pembangunan 2, no. 2 (2018): 27-42.
Yani, Fitri, and Erni Damayanti. "Peranan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Perkembangan Hukum di Indonesia." Jurnal Lex Justitia 3, no. 1 (2021): 36-51.