Brown, F. A. 2008. Collaborative learning in the EAP classroom: Students’ perceptions. English for Specific Purposes, 7(1): 1-18. Retrieved October 15th, 2012, from http://www.esp-world.info/Articles_17/PDF/Collaborativelearning.pdf.
Dunn, L., Morgan, C., O’Reilly., & Parry, S. 2004. The student assessment handbook. London: Routledge Falmer-Taylor & Francis Group.
Falchikov, N. 2001. Learning together: Peer tutoring in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer.
Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. 2005. Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Gilles, R. M., & Ashman, A, F. 2003. Co-operative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups. In Ross, J. A., & Rolheiser, C, Student assessment practices in co-operative learning. (Pp. 119-135). London: Routledge Falmer.
Gokhale, A. A. 1995. Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22-30.
Hyland, K. 2008. Genre and academic writing in the disciplines. Language Teaching, 41(4): 543-562.
Hyland, K. 2003. Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12: 17-29.
Kern, R. 2000. Literacy and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lambert, D., & Lines, D. 2000. Understanding Assessment: Purposes, perceptions, practice. London: Routledge Falmer.
Lee, I. 2012. Genre-based teaching and assessment in secondary English classrooms. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(4): 120-136.
Negari, G. M. 2011. A study on strategy instruction and EFL learners’ writing skill. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2): 299-307.
Nitko, A. J. 1996. Educational assessment of students (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Merrill, an imprint of Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Osterholt, D. A., & Barratt, K. 2010. Ideas for practice: A collaborative look to the classroom. Journal of Developmental Education, 34(2): 26-35.
Paltridge, B. 2001. Genre and the language learning classroom. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. 2002. Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. In Reppen, R., A genre-based approach to content writing instruction (Pp. 321-327). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roberts, T. S. 2003. Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice. In Treleaven, L., A new taxonomy for evaluation studies of online collaborative learning (Pp. 160-180). Hershey: Idea Group Inc.
Strickland, D. S., Ganske, K., & Monroe, J. K. (2006). Supporting struggling readers and writers: Strategies for classroom intervention 3-6. Portland: Stenhouse Publishers.
Sullivan, P., Zhang, Y., & Zheng, F. 2012. College writing in China and America: A modest and humble conversation, with writing samples. The Journal of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, 64(2): 306-331.
Swami, J. A. 2008. Sensitizing ESL learners to genre. TESL-Education Journal, 13(3): 1-13. Retrieved May 18th, 2013, from http://www.tesl-ej.org/ej47/a9.html.
Widodo, H. P. 2006. Designing a genre-based lesson plan for an academic writing course. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 5(3): 173-199.
Yazici, H. J. 2005. A study of collaborative learning style and team learning performance. Education + Training, 47(3): 216-229.
- Abstract viewed - 269 times
- PDF downloaded - 161 times
Affiliations
Didik Rinan Sumekto
Widyadarma University Klaten, Indonesia
Mursid Saleh
Postgraduate Program Semarang State University, Indonesia
Retmono -
Postgraduate Program Semarang State University, Indonesia
Ahmad Sofwan
Postgraduate Program Semarang State University, Indonesia
How to Cite
PRE-SERVICE ENGLISH TEACHER’S PERCEPTION ON COLLABORATIVE GENRE-BASED WRITING
Vol 3 No 2 (2015): November 2015
Submitted: Mar 22, 2016
Published:
Abstract
This study was aimed at investigating the collaborative learning effectiveness and contribution toward pre-service English teachers’ (PSETs’) perception conveyed on genre-based writing lectures. The sample was 86 undergraduate pre-service English teachers (PSETs), Tidar University of Magelang (45 respondents) and Widya Dharma University of Klaten (41 respondents). This study used simple random sampling. Data were collected by means of questionnaire using 5-scaled Likert rating to obtain PSETs’ perception, and then analyzed quantitatively by applying the SPSS program. The findings showed that the highest response toward each category in the perception referred to (1) 41.9% or 36 responses on sometimes toward lecturer’s instruction method; 44.2% or 38 responses on seldom toward learning assessment process; 48.2 or 41 responses on seldom toward lecturer’s assessment mechanism; and 53.5% or 46 responses on sometimes toward lecturer’s instruction evaluation and reflection; and (2) there were 47.4% or 45 responses on sometimes which ranked to the highest response level on group’s performance goals; 48.4% or 46 responses on seldom which engaged PSET’s interpersonal competence; 48.4% or 46 responses on frequent which guided group maintenance; and 41.1% or 39 responses on sometimes toward classroom work.