Bloom, B.S. 1956. Taxonomy of educational objectives: Classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: Longman, Green & Co.
Borg, W. R., Gall. M., D. 1983. Educational Research an Introduction.New York and London, Longman Inc.
Burden, R. 1998. How can we best help children to become effective thinkers and learners? The case for and against thinking skills programmes. In Burden, R. and Williams, M. (Eds.), Thinking through the curriculum. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 1-27.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2006. Pedoman Pengembangan Buku Pelajaran. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2006. Standar Mutu Buku Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan.
Departmen Pendidikan Nasional . 2006. Standar Kompetens idan Kompetensi Dasar Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris untuk Kelas VII,VIII dan IX SMP/MTs Kurikulum 2006. Jakarta: DepartmenPendidikanNasional.
Fisher, A. 2006.Critical Thinking: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fisher, R. 2002. Creative Minds: Building communities of learning for the creative age. Paper at Thinking Qualities Initiative Conference, Hong Kong Baptist University, June 2002.
Kabilan, K.M. 2000.Creative and critical thinking in language classroom.Internet TESL Journal, 6/6. http://iteslj.org/Techniques/Kabilan-CriticalThinking.html accessed on 16th July 2012
Kasper, L. F. 2000. New technologies, new literacies: Focus discipline research and ESL learning communities. Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 105-128.
Kemdikbudnas.2010. Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional.
Ong, Ai-Choo. 2006. Implementing a thinking curriculum. In Ai-ChooOng and Gary D.Borich (Eds), Teaching strategies that promote thinking: Models and Curriculum Approaches. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Education. Pp. 305.
Onosko, J.J. Newmann, F.M. 1994. Creating more thoughtful learning environments. In J.N. Mangieri and C.Collins Block (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse Perspectives. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers. Pp. 27-49.
Ontario Ministry of education. 2012. The Ontario Curriculum for Grade 8: Language. This publication is available on the Ministry of Education’s website, at http://www.edu.gov.on.ca.
Priyana, J. et al. 2008. Scaffolding: English for Junior High School Students. Jakarta: PusatPerbukuanPendidikanNasional.
Subali, B. 2010. Analisis Statistika Menggunakan Program Spss Aplikasinya Dalam Rancangan Percobaan source: file:///C:/Users/32bit/Downloads/analisis%20data%20dengan%20SPSS%20rancob%202010-1.pdf accessed on March 12, 2014.
Susilohadi, G. et al. 2008. Contextual Teaching and Learning. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan Pendidikan Nasional.
Wardiman, A. et al. 2008. English in Focus. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan Pendidikan Nasional
Zainuddin, H., & Moore, R. A. 2003.Enhancing critical thinking with structured controversial dialogues.The Internet TESL Journal, 9(6). Retrieved July 10, 2007, from http://iteslj.org/Technique/Zainuddin-Controversial.html
- Abstract viewed - 453 times
- PDF downloaded - 458 times
Affiliations
Nur Zaida
SMP Negeri 8 Semarang
Ahmad Sofwan
Postgraduate Program, Semarang State University, Indonesia
How to Cite
INCORPORATING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS INTO AN ENGLISH TEXTBOOK FOR JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS OF SEMARANG CITY
Vol 3 No 2 (2015): November 2015
Submitted: Mar 22, 2016
Published:
Abstract
The objective of this study is to find out whether the use of English textbook which deliberately incorporatescritical thinking skills into its tasks is effective to promote critical thinking skills to the students of Semarang City. This study is based on the theory that critical thinking skills can be nurtured and the process of nurturing should be done directly and explicitly. A research and development (R and D) approach was utilized as the design of this study and the development of the textbook model was based on the results of the analysis of the existing English textbooks for junior high school students and the needs analysis. The prototype was validated by experts and practitioners before it was tried-out in a state school in Semarang. In the examination phase, an experimental research was conducted to the students and the teachers of three different schools in Semarang in the odd semester of the academic year of 2013/2014.The results showed that the students taught using the model had better results of critical thinking skills assessment than those who were not. With sensitive feedbacks and aids given by teachers, the students also showed a more active involvement in the learning process.