Implications of Changing the Terminology of a Contract of Work to a Mining Business Permit for Mineral and Coal Mining

Article Sidebar

Fulltext (English)
Published Apr 30, 2022
DOI https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v3i2.55214

Main Article Content

Achmad Beni Candra
Advocate at A.B. Law & Partner

Abstract

The existence of a paradigm that has changed from being young to investing has created various opinions on Law Number 3 of 2020 concerning Minerals and Coal. So it is necessary to make a comprehensive study that examines the implications of changing the terminology of a contract of work to a mining business permit (IUP). For this reason, researchers can formulate two problem formulations, first, how are the differences between contracts of work and mining business permits (IUP) in Indonesia. Second, what are the implications of changing the contract of work into a mining business permit (IUP) for mineral and coal mining in Indonesia? This research is normative juridical research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results show that the term contract of work has a long history with changing regulatory concepts, wherein Law Number 3 of 2020 there is a cut in regional authority, as well as a change in the contract of work regime which was changed to a mining business permit regime. These changes also have implications for the economic, social, cultural, and environmental sectors. Therefore, the central government must be able to ensure that these changes are also able to have a positive impact on the welfare of the people in the region, both economic, social, and cultural welfare region.

Article Details

How to Cite
Candra, A. B. (2022). Implications of Changing the Terminology of a Contract of Work to a Mining Business Permit for Mineral and Coal Mining. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 3(2), 215-242. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v3i2.55214
Issue
Vol 3 No 2 (2022): Various Approaches of Legal Reform in Indonesia and Global Perspective
Section
Research Article
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

Author Biography

Achmad Beni Candra, Advocate at A.B. Law & Partner

Achmad Beni Chandra is an Advocate at Law Office A.B. Law & Partners, Indonesia. He also enrolled as a Postrgraduate Student, Master of Laws, at the Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia.

References

Abrar, S. Hukum Pertambangan. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2004.

Adi Sulistyono. “Pembangunan Hukum Ekonomi Untuk Mendukung Pencapain Indonesia 2030.” In Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Hukum Ekonomi Pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, 23. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, 2007.

B. Barton. “Underlying Concepts and Theoretical Issues in Public Participation in Resources Development.” Human Rights in Natural Resource Development: Public Participation in the Sustainable Development of Mining and Energy Resources, 2002, 77–119.

Darminto Hartono. Economic Analysis of Law Atas Putusan KPPU Tetap. Jakarta: Fakultas Hukum UI, Lembaga Study Hukum dan Ekonomi, 2009.

John R. Owen n, Deanna Kemp. “Social Licence and Mining: A Critical Perspective.” Resources Policy, 2012, 3. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.06.016.

Kolk and Van Tulder. “Shell Is a Favourite Example of Exploitative Business Operations in the Developing World,” n.d., 798.

Marulak Pardede. “Implementasi Hukum Kontrak Karya Pertambangan Terhadap Kedaulatan Negara.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum DE JURE 18, no. 1 (2018): 17.

Mcgee, Jeffrey, and Jens Steffek. “The Copenhagen Turn in Global Climate Governance and the Contentious History of Differentiation in International Law.” Journal of Environme Ntal Law 28 (2016): 37–63. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1093/jel/eqw003.

Merah Johansyah, Ahmad Saini, Ahmad Ashov Birry Melky Nahar, Zamzami Arlinus. “Bencana Yang Diundangkan: Bagaimana Potret Awal Investasi Ekstraktif Energy Kotor Dan Keselamata Rakyat Dikawasan Resiko Bencana Indonesia.” Seri Pertama. Jakarta Selatan Baca selengkapnya di artikel: Home https://www.jatam.org/en, 2021.

Meyersfeld and Bonita. “Empty Promises and the Myth of Mining : Does Mining Lead to Pro-Poor Development ?” Business and Human Rights Journal 2, no. 2013 (2006): 31–53.

N.Sudrajat. Teori Dan Praktik Pertambangan Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia, 2013.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revi. Jakarta: Pernadamedia Group, 2005.

Philipus, and M.Hadjon. Pengantar Hukum Perizinan. Surabaya: Yuridika, 1993.

Putri, Resha Roshana, An-An Chandrawulan, dan Prita Amalia. “Peringkat Arus Investasi Indonesia Dalam Kerangka Asean-China Free Trade Agreement (Perbandingan Dengan Singapura, Malaysia, Thailand, Dan Vietnam) Ditinjau Dari Prinsip Fair and Equitable Treatment.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 48, no. 2 (2018): 275. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol48.no2.1664.

Putri, Rizkyana Zaffrindra, Lita Tyesta A L W. “Kajian Politik Hukum Tentang Perubahan Kewenangan Pemberian Izin Usaha Pertambangan Mineral Dan Batubara.” Jurnal Law Reform 11, no. 2 (2015): 203.

Salim, H. S. Hukum Pertambangan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2005.

Trihastuti, N. Hukum Kontrak Karya: Pola Kerjasama Pengusahaan Pertambangan Indonesia. Malang: Setara Press, 2013.

VALE. “Code of Ethical Conduct.” Accessed July 15, 2021. http://www.vale.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/ CodigoEtica/assets/docs/EN_CodigoCondutaEtica_VF.pdf.

Wenting Jiao, Xiaosen Zhang, Changhong Li, Jiaqi Guo. “Sustainable Transition of Mining Cities in China : Literature Review and Policy Analysis.” Resources Policy xxx, no. xxxx (2020): xxx. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101867.