Comparative Study on the Crime of Ḥirābah (Robbery) According to Imam Abu Hanifah and Imam Syafi’i
Main Article Content
Abstract
The crime of robbery, known as ḥirābah, falls under the category of crimes punishable by punishment (ḥadd). However, there are differences of opinion between Imam Abu Hanifah and Imam Syafi’i regarding certain aspects of the criminal provisions for ḥirābah. These differences pertain to the location of the crime, the legal status of multiple conspiring perpetrators, and the legal status of female perpetrators. To comprehend the perspectives of the two Imams, a thorough understanding of their respective methods for determining the law is necessary. This study employs library research as the methodology, utilizing document studies and secondary data sources for analysis. The descriptive-analytic and comparative data analysis approach is applied. The research findings reveal two key points. First, according to Imam Syafi’i, the letter "aw" in Surah Al-Māidah verse 33 signifies clarification and specification (bayān wa tafshil), implying that punishment should be based on the actions of the Muḥārib. In contrast, Imam Abu Hanifah argues that the letter "aw" represents an option, allowing judges flexibility to select the most suitable sentence. Second, the disagreement between Imam Abu Hanfah and Imam Syafi’i regarding the criminal culpability component of jarmah ḥirābah can impact the application of non-discriminatory laws if not adequately addressed, potentially leaving gaps in their implementation.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
References
———. At-Tasyri’ Al-Jinā’i Al-Islāmi Juz II. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, 2011.
———. Ensiklopedi Hukum Pidana Islam Jilid V. Bogor: Kharisma Ilmu, 2008.
Al-Farran, Syaikh Ahmad Musthafa. Tafsir Imam Syafi’i Juz 2. Edited by Fedrian Hasmand. Riyadh: Dar At-Tadmuriyyah, 2006.
al-Jaziri, Abdurrahman. Al-Fiqh ‘Ala Mazāhib Al-Arbā’Ah Jilid 5. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1986.
Al-Kasāni, ’Alauddin. Badā’i’ Al-Sanā’i Fi Tartīb Al-Sharā’i Juz 7. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1997.
Al-Syafi’i, Muhyiddin Abu Zakaria Yahya Bin Syarof. Majmu’ Syarah Muhazzab Juz 20, n.d.
Anam, Ahmad Syifa’ul (ed.). Mengelola Khilafiyah Menggapai Rahmat. Semarang: Walisongo Press, 2009.
Asy-Syairazi, Abū Ishaq. At-Tanbīh Fi Al-Fiqh Asy-Syāfī’i Jilid I, n.d.
Djazuli. Fiqih Jinayat. Jakarta: Grafindo Persada, 1996.
Doi, Abdurrahman. Tindak Pidana Dalam Syariat Islam. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1991.
Hakim, Rahmat. Hukum Pidana Islam. Bandung: Setia Pustaka, 2000.
Halimah. Hukum Pidana Islam Menurut Ajaran Ahli Sunnah Wal-Jama’ah. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1968.
Hamka. Tafsir Al-Azhar Juz VI. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2015.
Katsir, Ismail bin Umar Ibnu. Tafsir Ibnu Katsir Jilid 3. Edited by M. Abdul Ghaffar. Bogor: Pustaka Imam Syafi’i, 2003.
Khasan, Moh. “From Textuality To Universality: The Evolution of Ḥirābah Crimes in Islamic Jurisprudence.” Journal of Islamic Studies, Vol. 59, No. 1, 2021, 59 (2021): 7.
Makinuddin. “Tobat Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Ḥirābah Dalam Al-Qur’an (Kajian Surat Al-Maidah: 33-34).” Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Vol 5, No. 2, Des 2019 5 (2019): 320–21.
Muslich, Ahmad Wardani. Hukum Pidana Islam. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005.
Pasal 28 D ayat (2) UUD 1945. No Title, n.d.
Penerjemah, Tim. Al-Qur’an Dan Terjemahannya. Jakarta: Departemen Agama RI, 1990.
Qoyyim, Ibnu. Hukum Acara Peradilan Islam. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2006.
Rafid, Noercholis and Saidah. “Sanksi Pidana Bagi Anak Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Perspektif Fiqih Jinayah.” Jurnal Al-Maiyyah, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2018 11 (2018): 333.
Rokhmadi. Hukum Pidana Islam. Semarang: Karya Abadi Jaya, 2015.
Sabiq, Sayyid. Fikih Sunnah. Jakarta: Darul Fath, 2004.
Sahid. Epistimologi Hukum Pidana. Surabaya: Pustaka Idea, 2015.
Soerodibroto, R. Sunarto. “KUHP Dan KUHAP Dilengkapi Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung Dan Hode Raad.” In 5. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2006.
Sultan, Lomba, and Yusran. “Penanganan Terhadap Perilaku ‘Begal’ Dalam Al-Quran: Pendekatan Hukum Islam Dan Solidaritas Sosial.” Jurnal Sosioreligius, Vol.1, No.IV, Juni 2019 1, no. IV (June 2019): 61–62.
Syafi’i, Imam. Al-Umm Jilid 10. Kuala Lumpur: Victory Agencie, n.d.
———. Al-Umm Jilid 11. Edited by Misbah. Jakarta: Pustaka Azzam, 2015.
Wahab, Syeikh Abdul. Al-Mizān Al-Kubra Li Asy-Sya’rāni Juz 2. Lebanon: A’lam al-Kutūb, 1989.
Zahrah, Abu. Al-Jarīmah Wa Al-Uqūbah Fi Al-Fiqh Al-Islām Juz 1. Mesir: Dar al-Bab, 1998.