Should Unlawful Combatants be Considered as Prisoners of War when Captured?
Main Article Content
Abstract
When an enemy combatant is captured or held captive, they are typically designated as a prisoner of war (POW), which grants them certain rights and protections under the Geneva Conventions. Even during the pre-trial detention phase, it is expected that the State or the capturing belligerent party treats the combatant humanely. However, a complication arises in distinguishing between "enemy combatants," a term that encompasses both "lawful" and "unlawful" combatants. While lawful combatants are automatically granted POW status, classifying unlawful combatants in a similar manner is generally discouraged. Consequently, captured combatants may be denied the rights afforded to POWs. Although the term "enemy combatant" lacks an official existence in the Geneva Conventions, it is commonly used in other texts and has become a subject of debate. Regrettably, this omission leaves those involved in illegal armed conflict vulnerable to cruel punishments and inhumane treatment while in enemy custody. This research explores the discrimination between lawful and unlawful combatants, questioning whether it is justifiable to withhold POW status or proper protection solely based on the absence of explicit mention in the Geneva Conventions.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
References
Aukerman M. J., War, crime, or war crime? interrogating the analogy between war and terror. in David K. Linnan (ed), Enemy Combatants, Terrorism, and Armed Conflict Law: A Guide to the Issues: A Guide to the Issues (ABC-CLIO 2008)
Bilkova V. ‘Talking About Unlawful Combatants? A Short and Concise Assessment of a Long and Multifaceted Debate’ [2009] 3(2) Central European Journal of International and Security Studies 38
Condé H. V., A Handbook of International Human Rights Terminology (University of Nebraska Press 1999)
Crawford E., Combatants. in Rain Liivoja and Tim Mccormack (eds), Routledge Handbook of the Law of Armed Conflict (Routledge 2016)
Crawford E., The Treatment of Combatants and Insurgents Under the Law of Armed Conflict (OUP Oxford 2010)
Danner A. M. , ‘Defining Unlawful Enemy Combatants: A Centripetal Story’ [2007] 43(1) Texas International Law Journal
Detter I., ‘The Law of War and Illegal Combatants’ [2007] 75(5/6) The George Washington Law Review
Dinstein Y., ‘Unlawful Combatancy’ [2003] 79(1) International Law Studies
Dinstein Y., The Conduct of Hostilities Under the Law of International Armed Conflict (Cambridge University Press 2004)
Dörmann K., 'The legal situation of “unlawful/unprivileged combatants”' [2003] 85(849) International Review of the Red Cross
Ex Parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942)
Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, (adopted 12 August 1949, came into force 21 October 1950) 75 UNTS 287
Geneva Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, (adopted 12 August 1949, came into force 21 October 1950) 75 UNTS 135
Gill T. D. and Sliedregt E., ‘Guantánamo Bay: A Reflection on the Legal Status and Rights of ‘Unlawful Enemy Combatants’ [2005] 1(1) Utrecht Law Review
Goldman R. K. and Tittemore B. D., ‘Unprivileged Combatants and the Hostilities in Afghanistan: Their Status and Rights Under International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law’ [2002] The American Society of International Law Task Force Papers
Güler T. S., “Unlawful” Enemy Combatants: An Exceptional CATEGORY With Unique Tensions' [2016] 6(12) Human Rights Review
Haynes W., ‘Enemy Combatants’ (Council on Foreign Relations, 12 December 2002)
Jinks D., 'The Declining Significance of POW Status' [2004] 45(2) Harvard International Law Journal
Joanne Mariner, ‘A First Look at the Military Commissions Act of 2009, Part One’ (Find Law, 2009)
Kittel L. ‘Trying Terrorists: The Case for Expanding the Jurisdiction of Military Commissions to US Citizens’ [2013] 44(1) Georgetown Journal of International Law
Lannoy K., ‘Unlawful/unprivileged combatant, armed conflict and international law in the 21st century: Slipping through the loopholes of the Geneva Conventions?’ (Master, Faculty of Law Ghent University 2009-2010)
Military Commissions Act of 2006 (USA)
Mofidi M. and Eckert A. E., ‘Unlawful Combatants or Prisoners of War: The Law and Politics of Labels’ [2003] 36(1) Cornell International Law Journal 2003
Prosecutor v. ZejnildelalicZdravkoMucic aka “Pavo” HazimdelicEsadlandzo aka “Zenga”IT-96-21-T (16 November 1998)
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), (adopted 2 December 1977 came into force on 7 December 1979) 1125 UNTS 3
RondonY. C., ‘The Military Commissions Act of 2009: Did Congress Get it Right?’ [2012] (online)Student Appeal
Sadat L.N., ‘A Presumption of Guilt: The Unlawful Enemy Combatant and the US War on Terror’ [2009] 37(4) Denver Journal of International Law and Policy
Sassoli M., ‘Query: Is there a status of “unlawful combatant?”’ [2006] 80International Law Studies operations
Solis G. D., The Law of Armed Conflict (Cambridge University Press 2010)
Värk R., ‘The Status and Protection of Unlawful Combatants’ [2005] 10 Juridica International
Watkin K., ‘Warriors Without Rights? Combatants, Unprivileged Belligerents, and the Struggle Over Legitimacy’ [2005] (2) Program on Humanitarian Policy and Conflict Research, Harvard University Occasional Paper Series