Changes to the Term of Office of Constitutional Justices in Law Number 7 of 2020 concerning the Constitutional Court: Discourse on Legal Reform in the Independence of Judicial Power in Indonesia

Main Article Content

Muhammad Wahyu Saiful Huda
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4723-5846

Abstract

Indonesia, as a nation governed by the rule of law, meticulously regulates all activities, including government positions. In 2020, a significant legal reform took place with the enactment of Law Number 7 of 2020 concerning the Constitutional Court. Nevertheless, this law has encountered several issues, both in form and substance. A notable alteration within this legislation was the elongation of the term of office for Constitutional Court judges, extending it from 5 years to a maximum of 15 years. This substantial change caught the Indonesian populace by surprise and prompted numerous requests for a review of the Constitutional Court Law, as it potentially infringes upon the constitutional rights of individuals aspiring to serve as Constitutional Judges, thereby undermining the concept of legal justice. Moreover, an extended term of office also poses a threat to the independence of judges. Consequently, the author seeks to address this issue using normative juridical methods and conduct a comparative analysis with several other countries to arrive at a comprehensive assessment. Through this research, it becomes evident that the extended term of office is excessively prolonged and carries the potential for abuse of power. Additionally, it appears to be entangled in political transactions between Constitutional Court Judges and the institutions that support them. In essence, this study underscores the excessive duration of the term of office as a potential avenue for power misuse and highlights its connection to political dealings among Constitutional Court Judges and their affiliated institutions.

Article Details

How to Cite
Huda, M. W. S. (2023). Changes to the Term of Office of Constitutional Justices in Law Number 7 of 2020 concerning the Constitutional Court: Discourse on Legal Reform in the Independence of Judicial Power in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 4(3), 429-448. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v4i3.68100
Section
Research Article

References

Adlhiyati, Zakki, and Achmad Achmad. “Melacak Keadilan dalam Regulasi Poligami: Kajian Filsafat Keadilan Aristoteles, Thomas Aquinas, dan John Rawls”. Undang: Jurnal Hukum 2, No. 2 (2019): 409–431. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.2.409-431

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. (Jakarta: Sekretaris Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MKRI, 2006).

Aulia, Eza. "Sistem Pengawasan Terhadap Hakim Konstitusi dalam Mewujudkan Independensi Hakim." Jurnal Public Policy 2, No. 1 (2018): 105-113. https://doi.org/10.35308/jpp.v2i1.691

Azzahra, Tiara Aliya. “Koalisi Masyarakat Gugat UU MK soal Sistem Rekrutmen-Masa Jabatan Hakim”. Online Detik News, November 3 (2020). Retrieved from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5240050/koalisi-masyarakat-gugat-uu-mk-soal-sistem-rekrutmen-masa-jabatan-hakim

Baihaki, Muhammad Reza. “Problematika Open Legal Policy dalam Periodisasi Masa Jabatan Hakim Konstitusi”. Thesis (Jakarat: Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2019).

Basah, Sjachran. Eksistensi dan Tolak Ukur Badan Peradilan Administrasi Negara di Indonesia. (Bandung: Alumni, 1994)

Baum, Lawrence. Judges and Their Audience a Perspective on Judicial Behavior. (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2006).

Baum, Lawrence. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. (Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 2009).

Budiardjo, Miriam. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. (Jakarta: Gramedia, 2022).

Budisetyowati, Dwi Andayani. “Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI sebagai Dasar Perlindungan Hak–Hak Warga Negara”. In Dri Utari Christina Rachmawati, and Ismail Hasani (Eds). Masa Depan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI: Naskah Konferensi Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pemajuan Hak Konstitusional Warga. (Jakarta: Pustaka Masyarakat Setara, 2013), pp. 279-298.

Butt, Simon, and Tim Lindsey. "Judicial Mafia: The Courts and State Illegality in Indonesia." In The State and Illegality in Indonesia. (Leiden: Brill, 2010), pp. 189-213. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004253681_011

Constitutional Court of Republic of Indonesia. “Siaran Pers Mahkamah Konstitusi: MK Putuskan Uji Materi Ketentuan Masa Jabatan Hakim MK [Constitutional Court Press Release: Court Decides on Material Review of Terms of Service for Court Judges]”. Online, June 20 (2022). Available online at https://www.mkri.id/public/content/infoumum/press/pdf/press_2344_20.6.22%20RIlis%2090.96.100.PUU-XVIII.2020%20UU%20MK%20IX%20-%20Putusan%20FY.pdf

Constitutional Court of Republic of Indonesia. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 6/PUU-XIV/2016. Online at https://www.mkri.id/public/content/persidangan/putusan/6_PUU-XIV_2016.pdf.

Crouch, Melissa, ed. The Politics of Court Reform: Judicial Change and Legal Culture in Indonesia. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).

Dressel, Björn, and Tomoo Inoue. "Megapolitical Cases before the Constitutional Court of Indonesia since 2004: An Empirical Study." Constitutional Review 4, No. 2 (2018): 157-187. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev421

Faiz. Pan Mohamad. “Teori Keadilan Jhon Rawls”. Jurnal Konstitusi 6, No. 1 (2009): 135–149.

Hasibuan, Rezky Panji Perdana Martua. “Penerapan Asas Independensi dalam Rekrutmen Hakim Konstitusi di Indonesia”. Thesis (Jakarta: Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 2020).

Held, David. "Restructuring Global Governance: Cosmopolitanism, Democracy and the Global Order." Millennium 37, No. 3 (2009): 535-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829809103231

Held, David. Demokrasi & Tatanan Global; Dari Negara Modern Hingga Pemerintahan Kosmopolitan. (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004).

Held, David. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. (California: Stanford University Press, 1995).

Hidayat, Arif. “Dialektika Fungsional Antara Hukum dan Otoritas Kekuasaan Negara”. Masalah-Masalah Hukum 42, No. 4 (2013): 565–575.

International Commission of Jurists. The Bangalore Principles on Judicial Conducts. Online at https://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/corruption/judicial_group/Bangalore_principles.pdf

Kurniawan, Faizal, Erni Agustin, and Rizki Amalia. “Unsur Kerugian dalam Unjustified Enrichment Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Korektif (Corrective Justice)”. Yuridika 33, No. 1 (2018): 19-40. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v33i1.7201

Manan, Bagir. Lembaga Kepresidenan. (Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2008).

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. (Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia, 2005).

Muhaimin, Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. (Mataram: Unram Press, 2020).

Pratiwi, Endang, Theo Negoro, and Hassanain Haykal. "Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan Hukum Atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum?." Jurnal Konstitusi 19, No. 2 (2022): 268-293. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1922

Rimdan, Rimdan. Kekuasaan Kehakiman Pasca-Amandemen Konstitusi. (Jakarta: Kencana, 2013).

Safa’at, Muhammad Ali. “Pengisian dan Masa Jabatan Hakim Konstitusi”. Paper, presenter in Seminar dan Lokakarya Nasional Perubahan Undang-Undang Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jember, May 22-26 (2016). Online at http://www.safaat.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2016/06/PENGISIAN-DAN-MASA-JABATAN-HAKIM-KONSTITUSI.pdf

Satriawan, Iwan, Farid Sufian Shuaib, Tanto Lailam, Rofi Aulia Rahman, Devi Seviyana. "A Comparison of Appointment of Supreme Court Justices in Indonesia and Malaysia." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 7, No. 2 (2022): 633-676. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v7i2.60862

Septiansyah, Zainal B., and Muhammad Ghalib. "Konsepsi Utilitarianisme dalam Filsafat Hukum dan Implementasinya di Indonesia”. Ijtihad 34, No. 1 (2019): 27–34. https://doi.org/10.15548/ijt.v34i1.3

Sherry, Suzanna. “Independent Judges and Independent Justice”. Law and Contemporary Problems 61, No. 3 (1998): 15-19 . https://doi.org/10.2307/1192413

Slamet, Kusnu Goesnadhie. “Prinsip Pengawasan Independensi Hakim”. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 14, No. 3 (2007): 434–447. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol14.iss3.art4

Slamet, Kusnu Goesniadhie. “Harmonisasi Hukum dalam Perspektif Perundang-Undangan”. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 11, No. 27 (2004): 82–96. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol11.iss27.art8

Tutik, Titik Triwulan. "Pengawasan Hakim Konstitusi dalam Sistem Pengawasan Hakim Menurut Undang-undang Dasar Negara RI 1945." Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 12, No. 2 (2012): 295-311.

Wijayanti, Winda, and Nuzul Quraini. "Transparansi dan Partisipasi Publik dalam Rekrutmen Calon Hakim Konstitusi." Jurnal Konstitusi 12, No. 4 (2015): 663-690. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1241

Yani, Ahmad. “Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia: Pendekatan Teori dan Praktek Konstitusi Undang-Undang Dasar 1945”. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 12, No. 2 (2018): 55-68. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2018.v12.119-135