Boud, D. 2013. Enhancing Learning Through Self Assessment. London: Kogan Page.
Burns. S & Bulman, C. 2000. Refleclive Practice in Nursing: The Growth of the Profeccional Practitioner (2nd ed.). Oxford United Kingdom: Blackwell Science.
Currie, A; Aggarwal, R; Sugden, C; Lewis, T; Ziprin, P & Darzi, A. 2010. Peer Assessment for Evaluation of Technical Skills in Surgery. International Journal of Surgery. 8(8): 577.
Fahimi, Z & Rahimi, A. 2015. On the Impact of Self Assessment Practice on Writing Skill. 2nd Global Conference on Linguistics and Foreign Language Teaching. Linelt. 92: 730-736.
Falchikov, N. 2013. Improving Student Assessment Through Involvement: Practical Solution for Aiding Learning in Higher and Further Education. London/New York: Routledge Falmer.
Freire, P. 1999. Politics of Culture of Power and Liberation. Jogjakarta: Read.
Gielen, M. 2015. Structuring Peer Assessment: Comparing the Impact of the Degree of Structure on Peer Feedback Content. Journal of Computers in Human Behavior. 52: 315-325.
Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. 2008. Highlights From TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and Science Achievement of US Fourth and Eighth Grade Students in an International Context.
Harrison, C. 2010. Peer and Self Assessment. International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd edition): 231-235.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/piiB9780080448947003134
Keller, T. 2016. Not Good Enough Grades if the Role of Self Assessment in the Transition to Tertiary Education. International Journal of Educational Research, 77: 62-73.
King, A. 2007. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. Haake (Ed.), Scripting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Cognitive, Computational, and Aducational Perspectives. New York: Springer.
Limone, P. 2012. Peer Learning and Peer Assessment to Enhance Participation in Online Courses: A Case Study in Teacher's Training in Foggia, Italy. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence, 3(3): 27-47.
Liu, N. & Carless, D. 2006. Peer Feedback: The Learning Element of Peer Assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3): 279-290.
Martin, MO, Mullis. IUS, Foy, P., & Stanco, GM 2012. TIMSS2011 International Result in Science.
Mary, Q. 2007. Good Practice Guide on Assessment and Feedback to Student. London: University of London.
Masek, A. 2015. Self, Peer and Teacher Assessments in Problem Based Learning: Are They in Agreements. Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences, 204: 309-317.
McLeay, & F; Wesson, D. 2014. Chinese versus UK Marketing Students' Perceptions of Peer Feedback and Peer Assessment. The International Journal of Management Education 12 (2): 142-150
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s1472811714000123
OECD 2010. PISA 2009 Results: Executive Summary.
OECD 2014. PISA 2012 Results in Focus What is Years Olds Know and What They can do with What They Know.
Shahbodin, F., Mohd, C, K ,. & Nuraini, C, K. 2013. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Self and Peer Assessment using PBL on Student Performance and Preference: Malaysian's Experience. International Journal of Computers & Technology, 4(2): 331-339.
Shearen, B. 2012. An Inter-rater Reliability Study of a Self-Assessment for the Multiple Intelligences. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 4(3): 131-138.
Stan, C; Manea, AD. 2015. The Divergent Relationship between Assessment and Self Assessment in Higher Education. Experimental Results. International Conference of Education, Reflection, Development, 109: 497-502.
Thanh, HTP & Gillies, R. 2010. Designing a culturally Appropriate Format of Formative Peer Assessment for Asian Student: The Case of Vietnamese Student. International journal of Education Reform, 19(2): 72-85.
Tsonkova, DG, Cyril, St., & Methodius, St. 2013. Study of Sports Teachers Students' Skills for Self-Assessment of Their Professional Qualities. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 1 (2).
Ueki, Y., & Ohnishi, K. 2016. Visualizing Self and Peer Assessment data by a Self Organizing Map for Inducing Awareness in Learners. International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, 8: 023-032.
- Abstract viewed - 272 times
- pdf downloaded - 229 times
Affiliations
Jiis Trini Retno Wuli
Program of Primary Education, Postgraduate, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Sri Mulyani Endang Susilowati
Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Andreas Priyono Budi Prasetyo
Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
How to Cite
The Influence of Self and Peer Assessment on Science Learning
Vol 6 No 3 (2017): December 2017
Submitted: Jan 30, 2018
Published: Dec 1, 2017
Abstract
Environmental conditions around the individual is very influential in this type of social learning patterns. The aims of this study were to identify the influence of self and peer assessment on science learning. This research used post test only control design. The result of the analysis of data Showed that; (1) 50% of the 30 students in the experimental class were able to do a self-assessment activities well; 56.67% of the 30 students in the experimental class were able to do peer assessment activities well; and 26.67% of the 30 students in the control class were able to do self-assessment activities well. (2) 100% of the 30 students in the experimental class were able to do a self-assessment of the science learning outcomes well; 93.3% of the 30 students in the experimental class were able to do peer assessment of the science learning outcomes well; and 73.3% of the 30 students in the control were able to obtain a good score of science learning outcomes according to the teacher assessment. The result results show that the application of self and peer assessment has an effect on students' learning activity and outcomes. The conclusion is that the application of self and peer assessment has an effect learning of science. It is necessary to exercise this assessment periodically during the learning activity. The research should combine students' assessment with that of reviews their teacher by 50% to obtain accurate learning outcomes.