Bowker, M. H. 2010. Teaching Students to Ask Questions Instead of Answering Them. The Nea Higher Education Journal, 127-134.
Cahyani, Nurjaya, & Sriasih. 2015. Analisis Keterampilan Bertanya Guru dan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Kelas X TAV 1 SMK Negeri 3 Singaraja. E-Journal Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 3(1): 1-12.
Chin, C. 2002. Student-Generated Questions: Encouraging Inquisitive Minds in Learning Science. Teaching and Learning, 23(1): 59-67.
Chin, C. 2004. Students' Questions: Fostering A Culture of Inquisitiveness in Science Classrooms. School Science Review, 86(314): 107-112.
Chin, C. & Osborne, J. 2008. Students’ Questions: A Potential Resource for Teaching and Learning Science. Studies in Science Education, 44: 1-39.
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R., & Koestner, R. 2001. The Pervasive Negative Effects of Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation: Response to Cameron. Review of Educational Research, 71: 43–51.
Depdiknas. 2003. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Depdiknas. 2016. Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Glynn, S. M. & Winter, L. K. 2004. Contextual Teaching and Learning of Science in Elementary School. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 16(2): 51-63.
Grosser, M., & Glombard, B. 2008. The Relationship between Culture and The Development of Critical Thinking Abilities of Prospective Teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24: 1364–1375.
Gusmentari, S. 2014. Sikap Ilmiah Siswa Kelas IV C dalam Pembelajaran IPA di SD Muhammadiyah Condongcatur.Tesis. PGSD. Yogyakarta: UNY.
Hariyadi, S. 2014. Bertanya, Pemicu Kreativitas dalam Interaksi Belajar. Jurnal Biology Science & Education, 3(1): 1-16.
Hudson, C. C. & Whisler, V., R. 2012. Contextual Teaching and Learning for Practitioners. Systemics, Cybernetic and Informatics Journal, 6(4): 54-58.
Johnson, E. B. 2002. Contextual Teaching and Learning: What It Is and Why It Is Here to Stay? California, USA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Kirch, S. A . 2007. Re/Production of Science Process Skills and A Scientific Ethos in An Early Childhood Classroom. Journal of Cult Stud of Sci Educ 2: 785-845.
Kunandar. 2009. Guru Profesional, Implementasi Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan dan Sukses dalam Sertifikasi Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Nur, M. 2003. Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Kontekstual (Contextual Teaching and Learning). Surabaya: Pusat Sains dan Matematika Sekolah Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Palmer, D. 2005. A Motivational View of Constructivist-Informed Teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15): 1853–1881.
Riduwan. 2012. Belajar Mudah Penelitian untuk Guru-Karyawan dan Peneliti Pemula. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rudiyanto, M. S. 2008. Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Matematika Volum Benda Putar Bernuansa Kontruktivisme Berbasis Multimedia Komputer dalam CD Interaktif. Makalah Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana UNNES. 16 Januari 2008.
Sanjayanti, Sadia, & Pujani. 2013. Pengaruh Model Contextual Teaching and Learning Bermuatan Pendidikan Karakter Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif dan Sikap Ilmiah Ditinjau dari Motivasi Belajar. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 3(1): 1-11.
Satriani, I., Emilia, E., & Gunawan, M. H. 2012. Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach to Teaching Writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1): 10-22.
Sihono, T. 2004. Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Sebagai Model Pembelajaran Ekonomi dalam KBK. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pendidikan, 1(1): 63-83.
Walsh, J. A. dan Sattes, B. D. 2011. Thinking Through Quality Questioning. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.
Widodo, Yeti, & Cucu. 2006. Peningkatan Kemampuan Siswa SD untuk Mengajukan Pertanyaan Produktif. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(1): 1-12.
Yasar, S. & Anagun, S.S. 2009. Reliability and Validity Studies of The Science and Technology Course Scientific Attitude Scale. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(2) : 43-54.
- Abstract viewed - 597 times
- pdf downloaded - 426 times
Affiliations
Tika Anggraeni
Program Primary Education, Postgraduate, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Sugiyo Sugiyo
Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Kustiono Kustiono
Faculty of Education, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
How to Cite
The Difference of Ability to Ask, Scientific Attitude, Motivation Before and After Following Contextual Teaching and Learning Model
Vol 6 No 3 (2017): December 2017
Submitted: Jan 31, 2018
Published: Dec 1, 2017
Abstract
The learning model used by teachers in the classroom based on the result of the researcher's initial observation is still conventional, the student's inquiring ability is low, the students' scientific attitude is not maximal and the student's motivation is low. Teachers need to use innovative learning models that are suitable and are PAIKEM. The purpose of this study is to know and analyze the ability to ask, scientific attitude, and motivation of students before and after following the model of learning CTL. The research method is quasi experimental quantitative with one group pretest and posttest design technique. Techniques and instruments of data collection is an observation technique with questioning ability observation instrument and psychometric scale measurement of scientific attitude and psychology scale of student motivation. Data analysis technique using non parametric statistical test. The results showed that the ability to ask students before and after follow the model of learning CTL is not experiencing a significant positive difference whereas scientific attitude and student motivation experienced a significant positive difference. This is reinforced by the results of hypothesis test 1 that is not accepted because the value of α = 0, 066 above the value of α = 5%. In addition, the results of hypothesis 2 and 3 are α values below α = 5%.