Aurum, J., &Hidayati(2013). Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw dan tipe think pair share terhadap hasil belajar ipa siswa kelas vii smp taman dewasa ibu pawiyatan tahun ajaran 2012/2013. Natural: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPA,1(1).Retrieved from
http://jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/NATURAL/article/view/255
Azni, T. N, &Jailani. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran trigonometri berbasis strategi pembelajaran inkuiri melalui model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe stad. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika,2(2).Retrieved from
https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/7347
Chu, S. Y. (2014). Application of the jigsaw cooperative learning method ineconomics course.International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research,2(10), 166-172.Retrieved from
https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijmsr/v2-i10/17.pdf
Dianti, N., & Suprijono, A. (2015). Perbedaan Prestasi Belajar (Kognitif, Afektif dan Psikomotor) Sejarah Siswa antara Pembelajaran Metode Studen Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) dengan Metode Ceramah di Kelas XI Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial SMA Negeri 1 Krembeng. e-Journal Pendidikan Sejarah, 3 (3), (616-627). Retrieved from
https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/avatara/article/view/13023/11994
Gunawan, R. (2011). Pendidikan ips filosofi, konsep, danaplikasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Indraswari, R. (2014). Penerapan paduan pembelajaran problem based learning (pbl) dan kooperatif type student teams achievement division (stad) untu k meningkatkan keterampilan membaca bahasa arab. Lisanul' Arab: Journal of Arabic Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 24-30. Retrieved from
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/laa/article/view/4135
Istiana, N., Sarwi., & Masturi. (2016).Penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif stad untuk meningkatkan penguasaan konsep dan keterampilan proses belajar fisika siswa smp kelas viii. Unnes Physics Education Journal, 5(1), 63-69. Retrieved from
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/upej/article/view/12707
Kusumawati, D. M. (2014). Meningkatkan aktivitas hasil belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran pkn pada materi hak asasi manusia (ham) dengan menggunakan model jigsaw di kelas x4 sma negeri 10 banjarmasin. Jurnal pendidikan kewarganegaraan, 4(7). Retrieved from
https://ppjp.ulm.ac.id/journal/index.php/pkn/article/view/438
Lynch, D., Smith, R., Provost, S., &Madden, J. (2015). Improving teaching capacity to increase student achievement: The key role of data interpretation by school leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(5) 575-592. Retrieved from
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JEA-10-2015-0092/full/html
Maftukhah, L., Harnanik, & Sunarto, St. (2012). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kesulitan belajar ips terpadu kelas vii di smp negeri 1 plantungan kabupaten kendal. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 1(2). Retrieved from
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eeaj/article/view/549
Mengduo, Q., & Xiaoling, J. (2010).Jigsaw strategy as a cooperative learningtechnique: focusing on the language learners.Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (Bimonthly), 33(4), 113-124.Retrieved from
http://www.celea.org.cn/teic/92/10120608.pdf
Ministry of National Education and Research. (2007). Bunga rampai keberhasilan guru dalam pembelajaran (sma, smk, dan slb). Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Rusman. (2014). Model-model pembelajaran: mengembangkan profesionalisme guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Singga, L. (2011). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw dan tsts terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1). Retrieved from
http://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JPM/article/view/55-64
Slavin, R.E. (2007). Cooperative learning teori, risetdanpraktik. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Suminar, T., Prihatin, T., & Syarif, M. I. (2016). Model of learning development on program life skills education for rural communities. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(6), 496-499.Retrieved from
http://www.ijiet.org/vol6/739-T0033.pdf
Suprihatinigsih, A., Rachman, M., & Suhandini, P. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran sosiologi berbasis jelajah alam sekitar terhadap ketrampilan memecahkan masalah siswa-siswa sma n 1 mranggen. Journal of Educational Social Studies, 5(1), 11-23. Retrieved from
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jess/article/view/13089
Usman, M. U. (2001). Menjadi guru provesional. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Windia, N. (2014). Penggunaan metode role playing untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa dalam mata pelajaran ips: pada siswa kelas v sdn buah batu kabupaten bandung barat tahun ajaran 2013/2014. Undergraduate Thesis. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. Retrieved from
http://repository.upi.edu/12968
Yasir, M & Karlina, E. (2015). Pengaruh model pembelajaran stad terhadap hasil belajar mata pelajaran akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan RND, 2(1).Retrieved from
http://journal.lppmunindra.ac.id/index.php/RDJE/article/download/1423/1160
Yu, A. T. W. (2016). Using jigsaw method to enhance the learning of research and consultancy techniques for postgraduate students. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(6), 1081-1091. Retrieved from
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ECAM-03-2016-0080/full/html
- Abstract viewed - 472 times
- pdf downloaded - 4191 times
Affiliations
Fadhilah Fatihannisa
Public Elementary School 1 Jekulo, Kudus, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
Purwadi Suhandini
Geography Education, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Tri Suminar
Non-formal Education, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
How to Cite
Jigsaw Learning VS Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD): Which One is Better in Improving Learning Outcomes
Vol 8 No 9 (2019): November 2019
Submitted: Oct 17, 2019
Published: Oct 17, 2019
Abstract
Social study is an essential subject for intellectual, emotional, cultural and social development for students, namely being able to develop responsible ways of thinking, behaving and behaving as individuals and citizens. The average cognitive results of students from the four schools based on midterm exam (UTS) I scores only 35.4% of students completed, while the rest were failed.The purpose of this study was to determine the differences oflearning outcomes between the Jigsaw learning model and Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) in the cognitive, affective and psychomotor domains. This comparative experimental study uses a pre-test–post-test comparations group design. The data collection tool uses test instruments and non-tests with quantitative data analysis techniques. The cognitive domains of students were measured using test instruments, including pre-test and post-test questions, while to measure affective, and psychomotor were measured using non-test instruments in the form of student observation sheets. The results of this study show that there is no difference increase in cognitive learning outcomes of students taught using Jigsaw and STAD learning models, but there are differences for affective and psychomotor domains. The Jigsaw learning model is more effective in improving social studies learning outcomes compared to that of the learning model (STAD). The highest score of Jigsaw in the cognitive domain is 84.17, and the affective domain is 64.17, but the lowest score of Jigsaw in the psychomotor domain is 63.09. The advantages of STAD in the psychomotor domain is 81.40, but in the affective domain is 59.58, based on learning outcomes in social studies students.