Alberto, P., & Troutman, A. C. (2013). Applied behavior analysis for teachers. Pearson Education.
Anderman, E. M., & Patrick, H. (2012). Achivement Goal Theory, Conceptualization of Ability/Intelligence, and Classroom Climate. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 173–191. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_8
Bergner, R. M. (2011). What is behavior? And so, what? New Ideas in Psychology, 29(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.08.001
Bowman-Perrott, L., Burke, M. D., de Marin, S., Zhang, N., & Davis, H. (2015). A Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research on Behavior Contracts: Effects on Behavioral and Academic Outcomes Among Children and Youth. Behavior Modification, 39(2), 247–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445514551383
Corey, G. (2017). Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotheraphy. In Cengage Learning (Vol. 53, Issue 9). http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/245180/245180.pdf%0Ahttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12380/245180%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2011.03.003%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.08.001%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2014.12
Edgemon, A. K., Rapp, J. T., Coon, J. C., Cruz-Khalili, A., Brogan, K. M., & Richling, S. M. (2021). Using behavior contracts to improve behavior of children and adolescents in multiple settings. Behavioral Interventions, 36(1), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1757
Erford, B. T., Miller, E. M., & Isbister, K. (2015). Technical adequacy of the disruptive behavior rating scale-2nd edition-self-report. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 48(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175614544689
Fatkullina, F., Morozkina, E., & Suleimanova, A. (2015). Modern Higher Education: Problems and Perspectives. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214(June), 571–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.762
Harrison, J. R., Vannest, K., Davis, J., & Reynolds, C. (2012). Common problem behaviors of children and adolescents in general education classrooms in the United States. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611421157
Jamilludin, M., Sugiharto, D. Y. P., & Japar, M. (2019). Group Counseling with Behavior Contract Technique to Reduce Verbal Aggressiveness Behavior. Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 9(2), 179–184. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jubk/article/view/34353
Malvankar, A. (2019). Students in Goa: Social Lives, Schooling, School Orientations and Aspirations. Social Change, 49(2), 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049085719832409
Müller, C. M., Hofmann, V., Begert, T., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2018). Peer influence on disruptive classroom behavior depends on teachers’ instructional practice. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 56(March), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2018.04.001
Myrick, R. D. (2011). Developmental Guidance and Counseling: A Practical Approach. Educational Media Corporation.
O’Donohue, W. T., & Fisher, J. E. (2008). Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Applying Empirically Supported Techniques in Your Practice. John Wiley & Sons. Inc.
Sa’adah, S., Wibowo, M. E., & Sunawan, S. (2021). The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavior Therapy Counseling to Reduce Bullying Behavior. Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 10(2), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.15294/jubk.v10i2.49313
Sanna, J. B., & Nursalim, M. (2018). Penerapan Konseling Kelompok Teknik Kontrak Perilaku Untuk Meningkatkan Perilaku Tanggung Jawab Pribadi Siswa Kelas VIII-F SMP Negeri 34 Surabaya. Jurnal BK UNESA, 8(1), 121–124. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-bk-unesa/article/view/22616
Selfridge, K. A. (2014). Contingency contracting in the elementary general education classroom. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 146. https://universidadviu.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/1643605048?accountid=198016
Sidiq, M. S. (2020). Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling the Effectiveness of Behavioral Counseling With Token Economy and Behavior Contract Techniques to Reduce Academic Procrastination. 9(1), 76–84.
Sieberer-nagler, K. (2016). Effective Classroom-Management & Positive Teaching. English Language Teaching, 9(1), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n1p163
Sprague, J., & Walker, H. (2000). Early identification and intervention for youth with antisocial and violent behavior. Exceptional Children, 66(3), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290006600307
Strawhun, J., O’Connor, A., & Peterson, R. (2013). Behavior Contracting. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2960.2323
Sunanto, J., Takeuchi, K., & Nakata, H. (2005). Pengantar Penelitian Dengan Subyek Tunggal. CRICED University of Tsukuba, 1–150. https://doi.org/10.5607/en.2016.25.1.33
Wills, H. P., Caldarella, P., Mason, B. A., Lappin, A., & Anderson, D. H. (2019). Improving Student Behavior in Middle Schools: Results of a Classroom Management Intervention. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 21(4), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300719857185
Yi, S., Yun, R., Duan, X., & Lu, Y. (2021). Similar or Different? A Comparison of Traditional Classroom and Smart Classroom’s Teaching Behavior in China. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(4), 461–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/004723952198
- Abstract viewed - 434 times
- PDF downloaded - 923 times
Affiliations
Siwi Vilia Intan Sari
Universitas Negeri Semarang
DYP Sugiharto
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Mulawarman Mulawarman
Universitas Negeri Semarang
How to Cite
The Effects of Behavioral Contracting Technique for Reducing Disruptive Behaviors of Students: A Single Subject Study
Vol 11 No 2 (2022): Regular Issue
Submitted: Aug 10, 2022
Published: Aug 30, 2022
Abstract
Disruptive behaviors during class can interfere with teaching and learning activities. Behavioral contracting is one of the techniques in the behavioral approach that was chosen to use in assisting students to achieve full awareness to surge self-control. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of behavioral contracting techniques to reduce disruptive behaviors of students at SMK Muhammadiyah Kajen Pekalongan. The subjects included 2 students selected by the purposive random sampling method. The data collection instrument consisted of an observation sheet with a frequency-measuring form. The design of this study was a single-subject design (SSD) in a pattern of A - B - A. Visual analysis of the graph intended to find the average score, level, trend, stability, and data overlap. The results of this analysis indicate a change in level and trend from stable to a decrease in the frequency of disruptive behavior which can then be concluded that the behavior contract technique is effective for reducing disruptive behavior in students. Further research is recommended to join other techniques with behavioral contracting.