Alan S. Bakes. “Helpful strategies for teaching effective confrontation skills”. Ideas and Research You Can Use: VISTAS 2012, Volume 1, https://www.counseling.org/resources/library/vistas/vistas12/article_36.pdf
Antoniadou, N., Kokkinos, C. M., & Markos, A. (2019). “Psychopathic traits and social anxiety in cyber-space: A context-dependent theoretical framework explaining online disinhibition”. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, hlm. 228–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.025, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563219302006?via%3Dihub
Aoyama, I., Barnard-Brak, L., & Talbert, T. (2011). “Cyberbullying among high school students: Cluster analysis of sex and age differences and the level of parental monitoring”. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning, 1 (1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcbpl.2011010103, https://www.igi-global.com/gateway/article/51562#pnlRecommendationForm
Ariffudin, I., & Japar, M. (2018). “Problematic internet use, problem solving skills and emotional regulation among junior high school students”. Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 7 (2),113–119. https://doi.org/10.15294/jubk.v7i2.25615, https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jubk/article/view/25615/11482
Bisri, M., Purwanto, E. &, & Japar, M. (2018). “The effectiveness of group counselling with modelling technique to improve self-efficacy in senior high school students’ decision making of study continuation”. Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 7 (1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.15294/jubk.v7i1.22281. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jubk/article/view/29125
Capuzzi, D., & Stauffer, M. D. (2016). “Counseling and Psychotherapy: Theories and Interventions. In Counseling and Psychotherapy.
Corey, G. (2017). “Theory and practice of Counselling and Psychotherapy” (10th Ed.). Brooks/cole. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/acap/detail.action?docID=4643533.
Haryanti, F., Sugiyo, &, & Purwanto, E. (2020). "The effectiveness of reality group counseling with confrontation and being-positive techniques to improve students’s self-control". Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling, 9 (3), hlm. 158–163. https://doi.org/10.15294/jubk.v9i3.43376, https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jubk/article/view/43376
Jusoh, Ahmad Jazimin & Ablul Rahman, Abdul Malek. (2011). “Construction, reliability and validity of choice theory and reality therapy (ctrt) group in malaysian problematic students”. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 4 (23) hlm. 391–404, https://www.academia.edu/
Jazilah, N & Kamsih, A. (2017). “Hubungan antara kesepian dengan ciri-ciri narsistik pada pelaku selfie di media sosial”. http://eprints.mercubuanayogya.ac.id/97/
Lashkarashvili, Nineli., & Tsinsadze, Magda (2022). “Toxicity detection in online Georgian discussions”. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights.2 (1), hlm. 1-11, e-ISSN:2667-0968, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100062, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667096822000064?via%3Dihub
Monjezizadeh, L., & Untoro, A. (2016). “How the online disinhibition effect affects the online video game industry”. Computer scine https://www.semanticscholar.org
Mulawarman, Ariffudin, I, Rahmawati, A.I.N. (2020). Konseling Kelompok Pendekatan Realita Pilihan dan Tanggung Jawab. Jakarta: Kencana
Mulawarman, Sunawan, & Amin Z.N, (2017). “The effectiveness of reality therapy for decreasing self-motivation problems of lower group students” Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 173 hlm. 242-245, DOI: 10.2991/icei-17.2018.63, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324195281
Munandar, A., Wibowo, M. E., & ... (2019). Group counseling reality with confrontation techniques to improve self-control and self-perception student’s problematic internet use”. Bimbingan Konseling, 8(2), 168–173. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jubk/article/view/28490
Sa’adah, Wibowo, M.E., & Sunawan, (2021). “The effectiveness of cognitive behavior therapy counseling to reduce bullying behavior” Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling. 10 (2) hlm. 112-122, e-ISSN: 2502-4450, DOI: 10.15294/jubk. v10i2.49313, https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jubk
Satriawan, N., Hardjono, & Karyanta, N. A. (2016). Hubungan antara konsep diri dengan toxic disinhibition online effect pada siswa smk n 8 surakarta. Wacana Psikologi, 8(2), 1–12. http://jurnalwacana.psikologi.fk.uns.ac.id/index.php/wacana/article/view/99/99
Sharf, R. (2012). Theories Of Psychoterapy and Counseling Concepts and Cases. Brooks/ColeA Division of Cengage Learning.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. In CyberPsychology & Behavior (Vol. 7, Issue 3, pp. 321–326). Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
Yildiz, M. A. (2017). “Emotion regulation strategies as predictors of internet addiction and smartphone addiction in adolescents”. Journal of Educational Sciences and Psychology, 6 (1), 66-79. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316879025_Emotion_regulation_strategies_as_predictors_of_internet_addiction_and_smartphone_addiction_in_adolescents
- Abstract viewed - 350 times
- PDF downloaded - 336 times
Affiliations
Burhanudin Burhanudin
Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang
Anwar Sutoyo
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Muhammad Japar
Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang
How to Cite
Reality Group Counseling with Confrontation and Being-Positive Techniques to Reduce Students’ Toxic Online Disinhibition
Vol 11 No 4 (2022): Special Issue
Submitted: Dec 8, 2022
Published: Dec 30, 2022
Abstract
Most of toxic online disinhibition perpretrators see their behavior as a means of fulfilling basic needs related to fun and freedom. However, it is a negative thing since it contradicts the principles of right, responsibility, and reality. Regarding these issues, the present study strived for examining the effectiveness of reality group counseling with confrontation and being-positive techniques to reduce toxic online disinhibition behavior. It involved 18 students chosen using a purposive sampling technique and grouped into three randomly in which each consisted of six students. Their data were collected using a toxic online disinhibition scale. Based on the results of mixed ANOVA statistical test, there laid the effect of time towards the reduction of toxic online disinhibition, namely (F (1.10, 16.558) = 317.66, p<0.01). The group effect on the reduction of online toxic disinhibition was also significant (F(2, 15) = 3.96, p<0.05). In terms of time interaction, the effect result was (F (2.21, 16.558) = 21.48, p<0.01). Thus, the findings of this study have confirmed that the group with the mixed techniques gained the highest effectiveness among the other groups. Finally, the study also serves interesting implications and suggestions to consider in the practice of reality group counseling.