Barzegar, K., & Khezri, H. (2012). Predicting Academic Cheating Among the Fifth Grade Students: The Role of Self-Efficacy and Academic Self-Handicapping. J. Life Sci. Biomed, 2(1), 1–6.
Bashir, H., & Bala, R. (2018). Development and validation of academic dishonesty scale (ADS): Presenting a multidimensional scale. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 57–74.
Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University.
Carpenter, D. D., Harding, T. S., Finelli, C. J., Montgomery, S. M., & Passow, H. J. (2006). Engineering students’ perceptions of and attitudes towards cheating. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(3), 181–194.
Desi, D., Elvinawanty, R., & Marpaung, W. (2018). Perilaku Menyontek Ditinjau dari Locus of Control pada Pelajar SMA. PHILANTHROPY: Journal of Psychology, 2(1), 11–26.
Galloway, M. K. (2012). Cheating in advantaged high schools: Prevalence, justifications, and possibilities for change. Ethics & Behavior, 22(5), 378–399.
Hasanah, F. (2016). Pengaruh kejujuran, konformitas, dan jenis kelamin terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa (academic dishonesty) pada perguruan tinggi umum dan berbasis agama di Kota Malang dengan persepsi religiusitas sebagai variabel moderator. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Herdian, H., Wulandari, D. A., & Istianah, I. (2019). Apakah Demografi Memprediksi Ketidakjujuran Akademik? IJIP: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Psychology, 1(1), 19–34.
Lawson, R. A. (2004). Is classroom cheating related to business students’ propensity to cheat in the" real world"? Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 189–199.
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997). Individual and contextual influences on academic dishonesty: A multicampus investigation. Research in Higher Education, 38, 379–396.
Roskens, R. W., & Dizney, H. F. (1966). A study of unethical academic behavior in high school and college. The Journal of Educational Research, 59(5), 231–234.
Sumaatmadja. 2008. Konsep Pembelajaran IPA dan Non IPA. Jakarta:Kanisius
- Abstract viewed - 130 times
- PDF downloaded - 150 times
Affiliations
Arif Sahin
universitas negeri semarang
Sugiyo Sugiyo
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Sunawan Sunawan
Universitas Negeri Semarang
How to Cite
Differences in Academic Dishonesty Viewed from Gender and School Majors
Vol 11 No 3 (2022): Special Issue
Submitted: May 4, 2023
Published: Oct 30, 2022
Abstract
A common thing done by students to get a good score is to cheat. This study aimed at examining the differences in academic dishonesty viewed from gender and majors in vocational high school (SMK) students throughout Godong Sub-district in Grobogan Regency. It involved 286 students. Their data were analyzed using a two-way anova test. Findings showed that (1) there found a difference in the academic dishonesty viewed from majors in which the electric power installation engineering department had the lowest academic dishonesty rate and the computer network engineering major had the highest academic dishonesty rate (2) there was no difference in academic dishonesty based on the type gender (3) there were differences in the level of interaction of academic dishonesty in terms of majors and gender, namely students in the electric power installation engineering department had the lowest level of academic dishonesty than the other groups. It can be concluded that there are differences in the level of academic dishonesty in terms of affairs, there are no differences in academic dishonesty based on gender and there are differrences in the interaction between the level of academic dishonesty in terms of majors and gender.