Business Entity Pre-Merger Notification Policy as Law Enforcement in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0 Kebijakan Pre-Merger Notification Badan Usaha Sebagai Penegakan Hukum di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0

Main Article Content

Farid Ibrahim Suhandi

Abstract

The consequence of the dynamics of globalization has given rise to an a priori phenomenon called the industrial revolution 4.0 so that this is a challenge for the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) to be able to protect market conditions that develop as dynamically as possible. Through this matter, the authority of KPPU needs to be optimized in order to adjust to market dynamics. The implementation of a company merger becomes a situation that has the potential to cause a form of unfair business competition. This is certainly the authority of KPPU to be able to provide supervision and evaluation of this matter, but with the post-merger notification regime still in force, it is possible that there will be a cancellation of a merger which has an impact on losses suffered by the company. Therefore, it is necessary to change the regime to pre-notification of merger which has gone through several necessary considerations. Thus, it is hoped that KPPU will be able to become the main protector in creating a fair and conducive market condition.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ibrahim Suhandi, F. (2019). Business Entity Pre-Merger Notification Policy as Law Enforcement in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0. Lex Scientia Law Review, 3(2), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v3i2.35395
Section
Articles

References

Alison Jones dan Brendan Surfin. 2011. EU Competition Law Text. Cases. and Materials 4 th Edition. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

Andi Fahmi Lubis et. al.. 2009. Hukum Persaingan Usaha Antara Teks dan Konteks. Jakarta: Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH.

Andrew Dunnet. 1998. Understanding Market: An Introduction to Microeconomics. 3 rd Edition. Indiana: Longman.

International Chamber of Commerce. 2015. “ICC Recommendations On PreMerger Notification Regimes” A policy statement prepared by the ICC Commission on Competition.

KataData. “Merger dan Akuisisi di Indonesia 2016 Tumbuh 26%” https://databoks.katadata.co.id/ datapublish/2017/05/15/merger-danakuisis i-indonesia-2016-tumbuh-26 diakses pada 25 Maret 2019.

Komisi Pengawasan Persaingan Usaha. Laporan Pengawasan Persaingan Usaha Tahun 2017.

Lasi (et.al). 2014. Industry 4.0.. Business & Information Systems Engineering. Pakpahan Normin S. 1995. Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Pengembangan Hukum Ekonomi Indonesia.

Perdana A. Saputro. 2012. Hukum Meger Indonesia dalam Konteks Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Tangerang: CR Publishing.

R Drath & Horch. 2014. “Industrie 4.0: Hit or hype?”. Industrial Forum. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine.

Sudjana. 2016. “Merger Dalam Perspektif Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Berdasarkan UU Nomor 5 Tahun 1999”. Jurnal Hukum POSITUM. Vol. 1. No. 1. Desember.

Thee Kian Wie. 2004. “Kebijakan Persaingan dan Undang-undang Antimonopoli dan Persaingan di Indonesia.” dalam buku Pembangunan. Kebebasan. dan “Mukjizat” Orde Baru. Cet 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Weston. J. Fred. dalam Munir Fuady. 1999. Hukum Tentang Merger. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Tobing, Donny. "Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Hukum Acara Persaingan Usaha dalam Perspektif Due Process of Law." Journal of Private and Commercial Law 1, no. 1 (2017): 1-28. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v1i1.12344.

Muniroh, Siti, & Ubaidillah Kamal. "The Indication of Unfair Business Competition Practice in The Implementation of Public Procurement Auction Using E-Tendering." Journal of Private and Commercial Law 2, no. 2 (2018): 78-93. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpcl.v2i2.15700.