Constitutional Debate on European Union’s Shifting Pathway towards Supranationalism
Main Article Content
Abstract
The rapid evolution of the European Union (EU) has suggested a new debate on regionalism due to the institutional transformation from intergovernmentalism to supranationalism. Hitherto, the EU has undergone a shifting pathway as a supranational institution that raises a further debate on supranational constitutionalism. This paper aimed to critically examine the EU's legal capacity for external relations at the World Trade Organization (WTO) following in identifying the impact of the EU member states to become members of this world institution as well. However, new approaches were considered within the shifting paradigm, which includes supranational union as an emerging pivotal global actor in international relations. This paper showed that the emergence of EU supranationalism has challenged the traditional debate on state sovereignty rooted in the Westphalian concept, particularly against the state primacy in international law. While the EU regionalism contributed to legal conversation both in the regional and international arena, the juxtaposition of the state and the supranational 'state' has increasingly blurred their limits, becoming sui generis in regionalism and state discourses among the areas of international law and constitutional law.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the view of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Authors retain the copyrights under this license, see our copyrights notice.
References
Ames, Glenn C. W. “Bananas, Beef, and Biotechnology: Three Contentious U.S.-EU Trade Disputes.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 23, no. 1 (March 1, 2001): 214–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1058-7195.00056.
Archick, Kristin. “The European Union: Questions and Answers.” Russia, China and Eurasia 27, no. 4/5 (2011): 823.
Barnett, Hilaire. Constitutional and Administrative Law. Routledge, 2006.
Basu, Durga Das. Comparative Federalism. New Delhi: LexisNexis, 2007.
Bogdandy, Armin von. “The European Constitution and European Identity: Text and Subtext of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 3, no. 2–3 (May 1, 2005): 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moi021.
Herdegen, Matthias. Principles of International Economic Law. OUP Oxford, 2013.
Hlavac, Marek. “Less than a State, More than an International Organization: The Sui Generis Nature of the European Union,” December 2, 2010.
Johnson, Debra, and Colin Turner. European Business: Policy Challenges for the New Commercial Environment. Psychology Press, 2000.
Kaczorowska, Alina. “European Union Law,” n.d., 1167.
Kaiser, Wolfram. “Culturally Embedded and Path-Dependent: Peripheral Alternatives to ECSC/EEC" Core Europe" since 1945.” Journal of European Integration History 7, no. 2 (2001): 11–36.
Kayaoglu, Turan. “Westphalian Eurocentrism in International Relations Theory.” International Studies Review 12, no. 2 (June 1, 2010): 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00928.x.
Krisch, Nico. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. OUP Oxford, 2012.
Leal-Arcas, Rafael. “Will EU Member States Play Any Role at the WTO after the EU Reform Treaty?” ICL Journal 1, no. 2 (2017): 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2007-0203.
Limbach, Kathrin. Uniformity of Customs Administration in the European Union. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.
Lowenfeld, Andreas F. International Economic Law. Oxford University Press, 2008.
McNeil, Dale E. “The First Case under the WTO’s Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement: The European Union’s Hormone Ban.” Virginia Journal of International Law 39 (1999 1998): 89.
Paskalia, Vicki. Free Movement, Social Security and Gender in the EU. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2007.
Pernice, Ingolf. “Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Treaty of Amsterdam: European Constitution-Making Revisited?” Common Market Law Review 36 (1999): 48.
Pollet-Fort, Anne. “Implications of the Lisbon Treaty on EU External Trade Policy. EU Centre Background Brief No. 2, March 2010.” EU Centre Background Brief, March 2010. http://aei.pitt.edu/33652/.
Ruszkowski, Janusz. “Supranationalism between the Nation-State and International Cooperation.” Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research 1, no. 1 (2009).
Sbragia, Alberta M. “The European Community: A Balancing Act.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 23, no. 3 (January 1, 1993): 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a038084.
Sengpunya, Phet. “ASEAN E-Commerce Legal Framework and Alignment of Lao PDR: A Review.” Lentera Hukum 6, no. 3 (December 31, 2019): 371–92. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v6i3.13709.
Shaw, Malcolm N. International Law. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Thomas, Ryan David. “Where’s the Beef--Mad Cows and the Blight of the SPS Agreement.” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 32 (1999): 487.
Tschentscher, Axel. “Comparing Constitutions and International Constitutional Law: A Primer,” February 10, 2011.
Waele, Henri de. Layered Global Player. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20751-8.
World Trade Organization. “WTO | Dispute Settlement - DS480: European Union — Anti-Dumping Measures on Biodiesel from Indonesia.” Accessed June 13, 2020. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds480_e.htm.
———. “WTO | Dispute Settlement - DS592: Indonesia - Measures Relating to Raw Materials.” Accessed June 13, 2020. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds592_e.htm.