Judicial Review in Indonesia: A Simplification Model

Article Sidebar

Fulltext (English)
Published Dec 20, 2022
DOI https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.54848

Main Article Content

Ahmad Siboy
Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Malang
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3879-5323
Sholahuddin Al-Fatih
Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1166-5182
Asrul Ibrahim Nur
Géza-Marton Doctoral School of Legal Studies, University of Debrecen
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7799-2111
Nur Putri Hidayah
Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0789-3596

Abstract

Judicial review ensures that no regulations are contrary to higher laws, and none is unfair to people. The review of Indonesia's laws and regulations is conducted based on a hierarchy of laws and regulations. However, many laws and regulations are not within the hierarchy that raises uncertainty about the institutions that are authorized to review them. This research aims to offer an alternative review authority against all types of laws and regulations applicable in Indonesia. This research employed normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, case, and historical approaches. This study stated that the alternative design of regulatory, judicial review is the unification of all judicial reviews' authority into one judicial institution. Second, separation into judicial institutions is different from the model of separation based on the order of hierarchy of legislation, based on the scope of usable power (local and national), based on legislation and non-legislation, based on the forming and separation institutions with cross-subsidy models.

Article Details

How to Cite
Siboy, A., Al-Fatih, S., Nur, A. I., & Hidayah, N. P. (2022). Judicial Review in Indonesia: A Simplification Model. Lex Scientia Law Review, 6(2), 359-390. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i2.54848
Issue
Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Mainstreaming Justice in a Various Global Context
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the view of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Authors retain the copyrights under this license, see our copyrights notice.

Author Biographies

Ahmad Siboy, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Malang

Dr. Ahmad Siboy, SH., M.H. is a lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Islamic University of Malang, Indonesia. His area of expertise includes Constitutional Law, State Administration Law, Regional Government Law. Several of his works have been published in several journals, including The Effectiveness of Administrative Efforts in Reducing State Administration Disputes (Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 2022), Limitation of the Authority of the Supreme Court in Examining the Constitutional Court Regulation concerning the Election of Regional Heads (Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, 2022), The Relationship between DKPP and PTUN Decisions regarding Ethical Violation by General Election Administrators (Jurnal Konstitusi, 2022), and Design to Resolve Case of Disqualification of Winning Candidates in Local Government Head Elections in Indonesia (CENTRAL ASIA AND THE CAUCASUS, 2022).

Sholahuddin Al-Fatih, Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia

Sholahuddin Al Fatih, S.H., M.H. is a lecturer at the Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia. His area of expertise includes Legislation Electoral Law Human Rights Constitutional Law Comparative Law. Some of his published works such as Legal Implications of Using Ministerial Instructions as a Legal Basis for the Implementation of Restriction on Community Activities During the Covid-19 Pandemic (KnE Social Sciences, 2022), Implementation of the Money Laundering Law as a Predicate Crime during the Covid-19 Outbreak (Hang Tuah Law Journal, 2022), and Juridical Analysis of Simultaneous Election Postpones during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Legal Certainty Perspective (Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 2022).

Asrul Ibrahim Nur, Géza-Marton Doctoral School of Legal Studies, University of Debrecen

Asrul Ibrahim Nur is a PhD Student at Géza-Marton Doctoral School of Legal Studies, University of Debrecen, Hungary. He also working as a Legal Analyst at Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Republic of Indonesia (Kementerian ESDM). His area of expertise concerning Legislation, Energy Law, Renewable Energy Law. Some of his recent publications such as The Limits of Indonesia’s Legal Framework for Electromobility: Regulatory and Sustainable Issues (Lentera Hukum, 2022), Proyeksi Masa Depan Kendaraan Listrik di Indonesia: Analisis Perspektif Regulasi dan Pengendalian Dampak Perubahan Iklim yang Berkelanjutan (Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia, 2021), and Proyeksi Transformasi Hukum Energi Terbarukan di Indonesia (Rechtsvinding Online, 2020).

Nur Putri Hidayah, Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Nur Putri Hidayah, S.H., M.H. is a lecturer at the Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia. His area of expertise includes Private Law, Labor Law, Customary Law, Agrarian Law. Some of her works have been presented and published on several conferencens and journals, such as The Urgency of Strengthening Creditor Legal Protection in Fiduciary Guarantee Agreements (KnE Social Sciences, 2022), Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions as Intellectual Property in Indonesia: A Juridical-Sociological Review (Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law Reform INCLAR 2022), and The Implementation of Labor Development Principles According to Job Creation Law as a Reason to Protect Wages Rights (BESTUUR, 2021).

References

Aditya, Zaka Firma, and Muhammad Reza Winata. “Rekonstruksi Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia (Reconstruction of The Hierarchy of Legislation In Indonesia).” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan 9, No. 1 (2018): 79–100. https://doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v9i1.976.

Agustine, Oly Viana. “Keberlakuan Yurisprudensi Pada Kewenangan Pengujian Undang-Undang Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 15, No. 3 (2018): 642. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1539.

Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin. “Model Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Satu Atap Melalui Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY 25, No. 2 (2018): 247. https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v25i2.6005.

Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin, Fachry Ahsany, and Ahmad Faiz Alamsyah. “Legal Protection of Labor Rights During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Pandemic.” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 7, No. 2 (2020): 100–115. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v7i2.10975.

Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin, and Felinda Istighfararisna Aulia. “Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Kasus Covid-19 Sebagai Perwujudan Perlindungan HAM (The State’s Responsibility in the Case of COVID-19 As a Realization of the Protection of Human Rights).” Jurnal HAM 12, No. 3 (2021): 349–66. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2021.12.349-366.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Putusan Monumental Menjawab Problematika Kenegaraan. (Malang: Setara Press, 2016).

Efendi, Jonaedi, and Johnny Ibrahim. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif dan Empiris. (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2018).

Fauzani, Muhammad Addi, and Fandi Nu Rohman. “Urgensi Rekonstruksi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Memberikan Pertimbangan Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka (Open Legal Policy).” Justitia Et Pax: Jurnal Hukum 35, No. 5 (2019): 127–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v35i2.2501.

Fitryantica, Agnes. “Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia Melalui Konsep Omnibus Law.” Gema Keadilan 6, No. 3 (2019): 300–316. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.6.3.300-316.

Ghoffar, Abdul. “Mewujudkan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Peradilan Yang Akuntabel Dan Terpercaya.” Pandecta: Research Law Journal 13, No. 2 (2018): 76–88. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v13i2.16727.

Gustama, Brilliant, Sarita, and Sholahuddin Al-fatih. “The Influence of TAP MPR ’ s Position on The Hierarchy System of Indonesian Laws and Regulations.” Indonesia Law Reform Journal 2, No. 1 (2022): 67–80. https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v2i1.19442.

Hanafi, Muhammad. “Kedudukan Musyawarah dan Demokrasi di Indonesia.” Jurnal Cita Hukum 1, No. 2 (2016). https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v1i2.2657.

Hoesein, Zainal Arifin. Judicial Review di Mahkamah Agung RI Tiga Dekade Pengujian Peraturan Perundangundangan. (Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2009).

Ilham, Maya Hildawati. “Kajian Atas Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana, dan Biaya Ringan Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Pencari Keadilan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 246 K/Pid/2017).” Verstek 7, No. 3 (2019): 13–14. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/verstek/article/view/38286/25314.

Indrati, Maria Farida. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan. (Jakarta: Kanisius, 2016).

Irwansyah. Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Edited by Ahsan Yunus. (Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2020).

Julyano, Mario, and Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan. “Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum.” Jurnal Crepido 1, No. 01 (2019): 13–22. https://doi.org/https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/crepido/article/download/6325/3197.

Kennedy, Richard, and Bonaventura Pradana Suhendarto. “Diskursus Hukum: Alternatif Pola Pengisian Jabatan Kepala Daerah di Masa Pandemi Covid-19.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 2, No. 2 (2020): 188–204. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v2i2.188-205.

Maladi, Y. “‘Benturan Asas Nemo Judex Idoneus In Propria Causa dan Asas Ius Curia Novit’ (Telaah Yuridis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 005/ Puu-Iv/2006).” Jurnal Konstitusi 7, No. 2 (2010): 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/jk%25x.

Nurhardianto, Fajar. “Sistem Hukum dan Posisi Hukum Indonesia.” Jurnal TAPIs 11, No. 1 (2015): 34–45. http://www.ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/TAPIs/article/view/840/723.

Rosadi, Otong. "Hukum Kodrat, Pancasila dan Asas Hukum dalam Pembentukan Hukum di Indonesia." Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 10, No. 3 (2010): 277-284.

Ryandika, Muhammad Sabil, and Jatmiko Wirawan. “Penerapan Peran Hakim Agung Sebagai Judex Juris dalam Perkara Pidana Studi Kasus Putusan MA No. 2239 K/PID.SUS/2012.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 2, No. 2239 (2015): 90–104. https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jph/article/view/19117/12368.

Scharpf, Fritz W. “Judicial Review and the Political Question: A Functional Analysis.” The Yale Law Journal 75, No. 4 (1966): 517–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/794865.

Schütze, Robert. “‘Delegated’ Legislation in the (New) European Union: A Constitutional Analysis.” Modern Law Review 74, No. 5 (2011): 661–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00866.x.

Subiharta. “Moralitas Hukum dalam Hukum Praksis Sebagai Suatu Keutamaan (Legal Morality in Practical Law as a Virtue).” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 4, No. 3 (2015): 385–98.

Sumadi, Ahmad Fadlil. “Hukum Dan Keadilan Sosial Dalam Perspektif Hukum Ketatanegaraan Law and Social Justice in Constitutional Law Perspective.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, No. 4 (2015): 853–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1249.

Thalib, Hambali, Sufirman Rahman, and Abdul Haris Semendawai. “The Role of Justice Collaborator in Uncovering Criminal Cases in Indonesia.” Diponegoro Law Review 2, No. 1 (April 2017): 27. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.2.1.2017.27-39.