Neutrality Law in the Age of Digitalization: An Analysis of the Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims to describe the application of the concept of neutrality law in the current era with the contamination of digitalization. The main problem refers to the intervention of third countries or neutral states in the Russian conflict v. Ukraine, then questioned the existence of neutrality law in the era of digitalization. The method used is a normative juridical method with a statute approach analyzed qualitatively and descriptively. The results show that validity is needed in determining the attitude of third countries or neutral states that intervene with belligerents (Russia/Ukraine). The determination of the validity is based on the scale of the intervention provided by the third country. Validity refers to the 1907 Hague Convention and the UN Charter, which generally outlines violations of territorial sovereignty and international law. So, in conclusion, the concept of open access, broad and immeasurable digitalization, cannot be avoided in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. This does not necessarily become a justification because the essence of the principle of neutrality and intervention is very different; the two cannot be combined unless a violation of international law indicates one. So basically, neutrality law can no longer be the primary regulation to control the attitude of a neutral state but requires new norms that shape the attitude of a neutral state so that it can be used as international customary law.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the view of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Authors retain the copyrights under this license, see our copyrights notice.
References
Aditya Jaya, Iswara. “5 Perang Yang Masih Terjadi Saat Ini, Termasuk Korea dan Yaman.” Kompas.com, 2021. https://internasional.kompas.com/read/2021/11/09/181522970/5-perang-yang-masih-terjadi-saat-ini-termasuk-korea-dan-yaman?page=all.
Adiningsih, Aprilia Putri, and Ngboawaji Daniel Nte. “North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons Development: The Impact for International Security and Stability”. International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia 1, No. 2 (2022): 123-58. https://doi.org/10.15294/ildisea.v1i2.58398
Ambarwati, Ambarwati, Ramdhany Denny, Rusman Rina. Hukum Humaniter Internasional: dalam Studi Hubungan Internasional. (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018).
Asnawi, Muhammad Iqbal. “Konsistensi Penegakan Hukum Humaniter Internasional dalam Hubungan Antar Bangsa.” Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan 12, No. 1 (2017): 111–22.
BBC News Indonesia. “Perang di Ukraina: Mayoritas Publik Indonesia Kagumi Putin, Pakar Khawatir ‘Bangsa Kita Dicap Hipokrit.’” bbc.com, 2022. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-60737298.
Campbell, Jud. “The Emergence of Neutrality.” The Yale Law Journal 131, No. 3 (2022): 782–97. https://www.yalelawjournal.org/article/the-emergence-of-neutrality.
Exporthub.Id. “Digitalisasi Adalah Proses Yang Penting Di Zaman Ini! Mengapa?” Exporthub.ID, 2022. https://www.exporthub.id/digitalisasi-adalah-proses-yang-penting-di-zaman-ini-mengapa/#:~:text=Adapun pengertian dari istilah digitalisasi,dokumen dalam bentuk transformasi digital.
Fariontono, Eko. “Tinjauan Hukum Netralitas Terhadap Perang Irak-Iran.” Thesis (Surabaya: Universitas Airlangga, 1989).
Gobel, Tenri. “Malware Perusak Yang Diduga Terafiliasi Dengan Rusia.” Cyberthreat.ID, 2020. https://cyberthreat.id/read/8978/NotPetya-Malware-Perusak-yang-Diduga-Terafiliasi-dengan-Rusia.
Hadju, Zainal Abdul Aziz. “Anotasi Spirit Unable dan Unwilling Terhadap Kejahatan Perang Israel Palestina.” Jambura Law Review 1, No. 2 (2019): 167–91. https://doi.org/10.33756/jalrev.v1i2.1990.
Haryomatarram, Haryomatarram. Hukum Humanity. (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2017).
Healy, Sean. "Neutrality: Principle or Tool?" Humanitarian Practice Network, 2021. https://odihpn.org/publication/neutrality-principle-or-tool/.
Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar. Konvensi-Konvensi Palang Merah 1949. (Bandung: Alumni Pers, 2018.
Lubis, Muhammad Ikhsan. "The Relationship of International Human Rights Law with International Humanitarian Law in Situations of International Armed Conflicts." JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies) 1, No. 1 (2016): 13-34. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v1i01.16565
Manogar, Gregory Joshua, and Diajeng Wulan Christianti. "Principle of Neutrality and the Obligation to Prevent International Humanitarian Law Violations: A Case Study of US Military Assistance in the Russia-Ukraine War." Padjajaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (PJIH) 10, No. 1 (2023): 80–100. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n1.a5.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. (Jakarta: Kencana, 2019).
Oppenheim, Oppenheim. International Law 9th Edition. (London: Oxford University Press, 2018).
Pietro, Verri. Dictionary of the International Law of Armed Conflict. (Geneva: ICRC, 2018).
Poerwadi, Nova. “Peran ‘Tentara Digital’ Dalam Konflik Rusia-Ukraina.” Liputan VoA, 2022.
Rahardian, Lalu. “Intelijen AS Bantu Ukraina Sikat Kapal Perang Rusia.” CNBC Indonesia, 2022. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20220506114751-4-336964/intelijen-as-bantu-ukraina-sikat-kapal-perang-rusia.
Rubin, Alfred P. “The Concept of Neutrality in International Law.” Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Denver Journal of International Law & Policy 16, No. 2 (1988): 353–75.
Schwarzenberger, Georg. International Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals: The Law of Armed Conflict. (London: Stevens Publisher, 2019).
Sefriani, Sefriani. Hukum Internasional Suatu Pengantar. (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018).
Shaw, Malcolm N. International Law 9th Edition. (London: Cambridge University Press, 2021).
Starke, J.G. An Introduction to International Law. (UK: Butterworth & Co Publishers Ltd, 2018).
Subagyo, Agus. “Media Sosial Dalam Hubungan Internasional.” Dinamika Global: Jurnal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional 4, No. 1 (2019): 1–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36859/jdg.v4i01.99.
Sulistia, Teguh. “Pengaturan Perang dan Konflik Bersenjata dalam Hukum Humaniter Internasional Humaniter Internasional.” Indonesian Journal of International Law 4, No. 3 (2021): 526–55. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol4.3.157.
Tirta, Leovaldi A. “Kekuatan Resolusi Majelis Umum PBB (UNGA) dan Dewan Keamanan PBB (UNSC) Sebagai Sumber Hukum Internasional.” Jurnal Yustika: Media Hukum dan Keadilan 14, No. 1 (2011): 93–107.
Towadi, Mellisa, Nur Mohamad Kasim, and Rumawi Rumawi. “An Indication of China’s Policy towards Uighurs and Its Implications by International Law Aspects.” Jambura Law Review 3, No. 1 (2021): 55–71. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v3i1.7730.
VOI. “Konten Disinformasi Juga Jadi Senjata Ampuh Dalam Konflik Rusia Kontra Ukraina.” VOI.ID, 2022. https://voi.id/bernas/143978/konten-disinformasi-juga-jadi-senjata-ampuh-dalam-konflik-rusia-kontra-ukraina.
Wani, Kentaro. Neutrality in International Law From the Sixteenth Century to 1945. (Ohio: Routledge, 2018).
Widjaja, Frederik Agnar. “Kedudukan Majelis Umum dalam Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa.” Rewang Rencang: Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 4, No. 1 (2023): 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v4i1.352.
Yves, Sandoz. The Law of the Hague and the Four Geneva Convention 1949. (US: Routledge Publisher, 2020).
Legislations
Geneva Convention 1949
Hague Convention V 1907 for neutrality in the war on land
Hague Convention XIII 1907 for neutrality in war at sea
Declaration of Respecting Maritime Law in Paris 1856
Declaration concerning the Laws of Naval War (London Naval Conference) 1909
Rules of Air Warfare 1922
Additional Protocol to Geneva I 1977