LITERASI MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP PADA PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING REALISTIK EDMODO SCHOOLOGY
Article Sidebar
Published
Feb 1, 2018
Main Article Content
Abstract
Literasi matematika (LM) siswa di beberapa SMP Semarang masih rendah karena siswa belum terbiasa menerapkan matematika untuk menyelesaikan masalah yang berkaitan dengan kehidupan sehari-hari. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui (1) kualitas perangkat pembelajaran PR dan PRES, (2) kondisi awal kemampuan LM, (3) peningkatan LM siswa SMP pada PRES lebih tinggi daripada peningkatan LM siswa pada PR dan lebih tinggi daripada peningkatan LM pada pembelajaran Ekspositori, (4) kemampuan LM siswa SMP pada PRES dan PR ditinjau dari aspek konten, Subjek penelitian tiga kelas, satu kelas pertama menggunakan pembelajaran PRES, kelas kedua menggunakan PR dan kelas ketiga menggunakan ekspositori. Hasil penelitian sebagai berikut. (1) kualitas perangkat pembelajaran PRES dan perangkat pembelajaran PR memenuhi kategori sangat baik, (3) kemampuan awal LM siswa SMP berdasarkan konten pada semua konten sangat rendah,(4)peningkatan LM siswa SMP pada pembelajaran PRES lebih tinggi daripada peningkatan LM siswa dengan pembelajaran PR dan lebih tinggi daripada peningkatan LM pada pembelajaran ekspositori.
Article Details
How to Cite
Wardono, W., Waluya, B., Kartono, K., Mulyono, M., & Mariani, S. (2018). LITERASI MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP PADA PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING REALISTIK EDMODO SCHOOLOGY. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 477-497. Retrieved from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/prisma/article/view/20138
Section
Articles
References
Arends, R. I. 2007. Learning to Teach: Belajar untuk Mengajar (7th ed). Translated by Soetjipto, H. P & S. M. Soetjipto. 2008. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Barnes, H and Elsie Venter. 2008. Mathematics as a Social Construct: Teaching Mathematics in Context. Pythagoras Journal . www.pythagoras.org.za diakses 14 April 2015
Bilgin, I., E. Senocak. & M. Sozbilir. 2009. The Effects of Problem Based Learning Instruction on University Students’ Performance of Conceptual and Quantitative Problem in Gas Concepts. Eurasia Jurnal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, Vol 5(2).
Chamberlin, S.A. & Moon, S.M. 2002. How Does the Problem Based Learning Approach Compare to The Model-Eliciting Activity Approach in Mathematics? Center of Innovation in Mathematic Training. Tersedia di: www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/chamberlin.pdf [diakses 17/12/2013].
De Lange, J. 1987. Mathematics, Insight and Meaning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Depdiknas. 2011. Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Matematika SMP Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Yogyakarta: Depdiknas
Edo, S. I. et all. 2013. Investigating Secondary School Students’ Difficulties in Modeling Problems PISA-Model Level 5 And 6.JIMS. http://jims-b.org/?p=513 diakses tanggal 13 Maret 2015.
Fletcher, C., Felicity., Janet, S., & Gavin, R. 2009. Approaching Difficulties in Literacy Development: Assessment, Pedagogy and Programmes. London: SAGE Publications Ltd
Geist,M.R., Webb, D.C, Kooij, H.V.D. 2011. Design Research in the Netherlands: Introducing Logarithms Using Realistic Mathematics Education. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 2: 47 – 52.www.tc.edu/jmetc diakses 6 Maret 2015.
Goodnough, K.C. & Hung, W. 2008. Engaging Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Adopting Nine Step Problem Based Learning Model. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem Based Learning. Vol. 2 (2). Tersedia di: http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1082 [diakses 13/11/2013].
Gravemeijer, K.P.E. 1994. Developing Realistic Mathematics Education. Utrecht: Freudhental University.
George J. Roy dan Farshid Safi. 2008. Investigating Whole Number Development Using Contextually Based Problems. Florida Association of Teacher Educators Journal. Volume 1 Number 8. http://www.fate1.org/journals/2008/roy.pdf diakses tanggal 13 Maret 2015
Hillman, W. 2003. Learning How to Learn: Problem Based Learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. Vol. 28 (2). Tersedia di: http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2003v28n2.1 [diakses 13/12/2013]..
Hung, W. 2006. The 3C3R Model: A Conceptual Framework for Designing Problems in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning. Vol. 1 (1). Tersedia di: http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1006 .
Jauhari. H.,Tri. A.,K., & Mardiyana. 2014. Ekspe rimentasi Pendekatan Pembelajaran Pendidi kan Matematika Realistik Indonesia dan Pen dekatan Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme Meng gunakan Teknik Hypnosis in Tea ching pada Materi Geometri Siswa Kelas VII MTs di Ka bupaten Ponorogo. Jurnal FKIP. http://jurnalfkip.uns.ac.id . diakses 7 Maret 2015
Kemendikbud. 2013. Materi Pelatihan Guru Matematika SMP/MTs tentang Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Kemdikbud. 2016. Peringkat dan Capaian PISA Indonesia Mengalami Peningkatan 06 Desember 2016. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2016/12/peringkat-dan-capaian-pisa-indonesia-mengalami-peningkatan
Kusumah, Y.S. 2011. Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Matematis Siswa. Makalah dalam kegiatan Pelatihan Aplikasi Teknologi dan Komunikasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Pendidikan Matematika Sekolah Pascasarjana UPI.
Mahdiansyah dan Rahmawati. 2014. Literasi Matematika Siswa Pendidikan Menengah: Analisis Menggunakan Desain Tes Internasional dengan Konteks Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 20(4).
Makonye, J. P. 2014. Teaching Functions Using a Realistic Mathematics Education Approach: A Theoretical Perspective.THEIJES Journal.www.theijes.com diakses 14 Maret 2015.
Mariani, S., et all. 2014. The Effectiveness of Learning by PBL Assisted Mathematics Pop Up Book Againts The Spatial Ability in Grade VIII on Geometry Subject Matter. International Journal of Education and Research. Vol.2 No. 8; 2014 ISSN: 2201-6333 (Print) ISSN: 2201-6740
Mohd-Yusof, K., Arsat, D., Borhan, M. T. B., de Graaff, E., Kolmos, A., & Phang, F. A. (Eds.).2013. PBL Across Cultures. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
Moretti, G. A. S. & Frandell, T. 2013. Literacy from a Right to Education Perspective. Report of the Director General of UNESCO to the United Nations General Assembly 68th Session.
Mulyanto, R. 2007. Pendekatan RME untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Operasi Pengurangan Bilangan Bulat Negatif Pada Pembelajaran Matematika di SDN Sukalerang I Sumedang.Jurnal UPI Edu.www.file.upi.edu diakses 6 Maret 2015
Nalole, M. 2008. Pembelajaran Pengurangan Pecahan Melalui Pendekatan Realistik di Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Inovasi. Volume 5, Nomor 3, September 2008 ISSN 1693-9034.
OECD. 2001. Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow. Further Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
..........., 2003. Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow. Further Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
______, 2004. Learning for Tomorrow’s World. First Result from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
______, 2007. PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World. Paris: OECD.
_______, 2009. PISA 2009 Assessment Framework- Key Competencies i Reading, Mathematics and Science. Paris: OECD.
________,2010a. PISA 2009 Result: What Students Know and Can Do. Student Performance in Reading Mathematics and Science (Vol. I). Paris: OECD.
_______, 2010b. Draft PISA 2012 Assessment Framework. (Online). Tersedia: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/15/46241909.pdf. (diunduh 27 September 2015).
______, 2013. PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do: Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science. (Volume 1). Paris: PISA- OECD Publishing.
______, 2016. PISA 2015 Results: What Students Know and Can Do: Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science. (Volume 1). Paris: PISA- OECD Publishing.
Ojose, B. 2011. Mathematics Literacy: Are We Able to Put The Mathematics We Learn into Everyday Use? Journal of Mathematics Education.© Education for All June 2011, Vol. 4, No. 1. www.educationforatoz.com diakses 8 Maret 2015
Okumu L. & Garii B. 2008. Mathematics and The world: What Do Teachers Recognize as Mathematics in Real World Practice. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast. www.math.umt.edu.com .
Prabawanto. 2009. Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Realistik untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Disposisi Matematik Siswa. Paper Workshop Nasional PMRI Dosen S1 Matematika PGSD di Hotel Cipaku Indah Bandung 27–30 Oktober 2009.
Rosa, M dan Orey, D.C. 2015. A Trivium Curriculum for Mathematics Based on Literacy, Matheracy, and Technorasy : an Ethnomathematics Perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education.
Russefendi, H.E.T. 2006. Pengantar Untuk Membantu Guru Mengembangkan Kompetensinya dalam Pengajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkaan CBSA. Bandung : Tarwijayasito
Savery, J.R. 2006. Overview of Problem-based Learning: Definitions and Distinction. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. Vol. 1 (1). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002.
Savery, J.R. & Duffy, T.M. 1995. Problem Based Learning: An Instructional Model and Its Constructivist Framework. Educational Technology. Vol. 35 (1).
Septianawati, T., 2013. Kemampuan Literasi Matematis. Artikel . http://tiaseptiana-wati.blogspot.co.id/2013/12/kemampuan-literasi-matematis.html. Diunduh 9 Maret 2016 pkl 15.00
Simanulang, J., 2013. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Materi Himpunan Konteks Laskar Pelangi dengan Pendekatan Pendidkan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI) Kelas VII Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Nasional. http://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/ view/1859 . Diakses 6 Maret 2015
Stacey, K. 2011. “The PISA View of Mathematical Literacy in Indonesiaâ€. IndoMS. J. M. E., 2(2).
Stacey, K. 2015. The PISA View of Mathematical Literacy in Indonesia. JME. www.IndoMS.com diakses 7 Maret 2015.
Sugiman dan Kusumah, Y. S. 2010. Dampak Pendidikan Matematika Realistik terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMP. JME. www.IndoMS-JME.com diakses 6 Maret 2015
Treffers, A. 1987. Three Dimensions a Model of Goal and Theory Description in Mathematics Education. Dordrecht: Reidel, The Wiscobas Project.
Wardono and Scolastika, M.. 2014. The Realistic Learning Model With Character Education And PISA Assesment To Improve Mathematics Literacy. International Journal of Education and Research. Vol.2 No. 7; 2014 ISSN: 2201-6333 (Print) ISSN: 2201-6740
Wardono, Budi, W, Kartono, Sukestiyarno, and Scolastika, M. 2015. The Realistic Scientific Humanist Learning with Character Education to Improve Mathematics Literacy Based on PISA. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(1).
Wardono, Budi, W., Scolastika, M. and S. Chandra, D. . 2016. Mathematics Literacy On Problem Based Learning With Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education Approach Assisted E-Learning Edmodo. Journal of Physics : Conference Series. Volume 693, Number 1; 2016. Journal indexing by Scopus http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/ 693/1/012014
Wardono, S. Mariani, P. Hendikawati, Ikayani. 2017. Mathematizing Process of Junior High School Students to Improve Mathematics Literacy Refers PISA on RCP Learning. Journal of Physics : Conference Series. Volume 824, Number 1; 2017. Journal indexing by Scopus. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/¬1742-6596/824/1/012049/meta
Wardono, et all. 2017. The Analysis of Mathematical Literacy on Realistic Problem-Based Learning With E-Edmodo Based On Student’s Self Efficacy. Article. Accepted in ICMSE 2017.
Wardono, Budi Waluya, Kartono, Mulyono, Mariani, S. 2017. Development of Innovative Problem Based Learning Model With PMRI-Scientific Approach Using ICT to Increase Mathematics Literacy and Independence-Character of Junior High School Students. Article. Accepted in ICMSE 2017.
Webb, D.C, Kooij, H.V.D, & Geist, M.R. 2011. Design Research in the Netherlands: Introducing Logarithms Using Realistic Mathematics Education. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 2: 47 – 52.www.tc.edu/jmetc diakses 6 Maret 2015.
Wijaya, A. 2012. Pendidikan Matematika Realistik.(Suatu Alternatif Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Zaranis, N., Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. 2013. Using Mobile Devices for Teaching Realistic Mathematics in Kindergarten Education. Creative Education, 4(7A1).
Zieber. 2006. History, Philosophy, and Criticism of Problem Based Learning in Adult Education. Calgary: University http://p4mriundiksha.wordpress.com/2010/11/-16/standar-pmri/
http://www.4icu.org/topAsia. 16. 2016 University Web Rankings | Asia
Barnes, H and Elsie Venter. 2008. Mathematics as a Social Construct: Teaching Mathematics in Context. Pythagoras Journal . www.pythagoras.org.za diakses 14 April 2015
Bilgin, I., E. Senocak. & M. Sozbilir. 2009. The Effects of Problem Based Learning Instruction on University Students’ Performance of Conceptual and Quantitative Problem in Gas Concepts. Eurasia Jurnal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, Vol 5(2).
Chamberlin, S.A. & Moon, S.M. 2002. How Does the Problem Based Learning Approach Compare to The Model-Eliciting Activity Approach in Mathematics? Center of Innovation in Mathematic Training. Tersedia di: www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/chamberlin.pdf [diakses 17/12/2013].
De Lange, J. 1987. Mathematics, Insight and Meaning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Depdiknas. 2011. Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Matematika SMP Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Yogyakarta: Depdiknas
Edo, S. I. et all. 2013. Investigating Secondary School Students’ Difficulties in Modeling Problems PISA-Model Level 5 And 6.JIMS. http://jims-b.org/?p=513 diakses tanggal 13 Maret 2015.
Fletcher, C., Felicity., Janet, S., & Gavin, R. 2009. Approaching Difficulties in Literacy Development: Assessment, Pedagogy and Programmes. London: SAGE Publications Ltd
Geist,M.R., Webb, D.C, Kooij, H.V.D. 2011. Design Research in the Netherlands: Introducing Logarithms Using Realistic Mathematics Education. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 2: 47 – 52.www.tc.edu/jmetc diakses 6 Maret 2015.
Goodnough, K.C. & Hung, W. 2008. Engaging Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Adopting Nine Step Problem Based Learning Model. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem Based Learning. Vol. 2 (2). Tersedia di: http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1082 [diakses 13/11/2013].
Gravemeijer, K.P.E. 1994. Developing Realistic Mathematics Education. Utrecht: Freudhental University.
George J. Roy dan Farshid Safi. 2008. Investigating Whole Number Development Using Contextually Based Problems. Florida Association of Teacher Educators Journal. Volume 1 Number 8. http://www.fate1.org/journals/2008/roy.pdf diakses tanggal 13 Maret 2015
Hillman, W. 2003. Learning How to Learn: Problem Based Learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. Vol. 28 (2). Tersedia di: http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2003v28n2.1 [diakses 13/12/2013]..
Hung, W. 2006. The 3C3R Model: A Conceptual Framework for Designing Problems in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning. Vol. 1 (1). Tersedia di: http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1006 .
Jauhari. H.,Tri. A.,K., & Mardiyana. 2014. Ekspe rimentasi Pendekatan Pembelajaran Pendidi kan Matematika Realistik Indonesia dan Pen dekatan Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme Meng gunakan Teknik Hypnosis in Tea ching pada Materi Geometri Siswa Kelas VII MTs di Ka bupaten Ponorogo. Jurnal FKIP. http://jurnalfkip.uns.ac.id . diakses 7 Maret 2015
Kemendikbud. 2013. Materi Pelatihan Guru Matematika SMP/MTs tentang Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Kemdikbud. 2016. Peringkat dan Capaian PISA Indonesia Mengalami Peningkatan 06 Desember 2016. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2016/12/peringkat-dan-capaian-pisa-indonesia-mengalami-peningkatan
Kusumah, Y.S. 2011. Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Matematis Siswa. Makalah dalam kegiatan Pelatihan Aplikasi Teknologi dan Komunikasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Pendidikan Matematika Sekolah Pascasarjana UPI.
Mahdiansyah dan Rahmawati. 2014. Literasi Matematika Siswa Pendidikan Menengah: Analisis Menggunakan Desain Tes Internasional dengan Konteks Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 20(4).
Makonye, J. P. 2014. Teaching Functions Using a Realistic Mathematics Education Approach: A Theoretical Perspective.THEIJES Journal.www.theijes.com diakses 14 Maret 2015.
Mariani, S., et all. 2014. The Effectiveness of Learning by PBL Assisted Mathematics Pop Up Book Againts The Spatial Ability in Grade VIII on Geometry Subject Matter. International Journal of Education and Research. Vol.2 No. 8; 2014 ISSN: 2201-6333 (Print) ISSN: 2201-6740
Mohd-Yusof, K., Arsat, D., Borhan, M. T. B., de Graaff, E., Kolmos, A., & Phang, F. A. (Eds.).2013. PBL Across Cultures. Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
Moretti, G. A. S. & Frandell, T. 2013. Literacy from a Right to Education Perspective. Report of the Director General of UNESCO to the United Nations General Assembly 68th Session.
Mulyanto, R. 2007. Pendekatan RME untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Operasi Pengurangan Bilangan Bulat Negatif Pada Pembelajaran Matematika di SDN Sukalerang I Sumedang.Jurnal UPI Edu.www.file.upi.edu diakses 6 Maret 2015
Nalole, M. 2008. Pembelajaran Pengurangan Pecahan Melalui Pendekatan Realistik di Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Inovasi. Volume 5, Nomor 3, September 2008 ISSN 1693-9034.
OECD. 2001. Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow. Further Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
..........., 2003. Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow. Further Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
______, 2004. Learning for Tomorrow’s World. First Result from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
______, 2007. PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World. Paris: OECD.
_______, 2009. PISA 2009 Assessment Framework- Key Competencies i Reading, Mathematics and Science. Paris: OECD.
________,2010a. PISA 2009 Result: What Students Know and Can Do. Student Performance in Reading Mathematics and Science (Vol. I). Paris: OECD.
_______, 2010b. Draft PISA 2012 Assessment Framework. (Online). Tersedia: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/15/46241909.pdf. (diunduh 27 September 2015).
______, 2013. PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do: Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science. (Volume 1). Paris: PISA- OECD Publishing.
______, 2016. PISA 2015 Results: What Students Know and Can Do: Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science. (Volume 1). Paris: PISA- OECD Publishing.
Ojose, B. 2011. Mathematics Literacy: Are We Able to Put The Mathematics We Learn into Everyday Use? Journal of Mathematics Education.© Education for All June 2011, Vol. 4, No. 1. www.educationforatoz.com diakses 8 Maret 2015
Okumu L. & Garii B. 2008. Mathematics and The world: What Do Teachers Recognize as Mathematics in Real World Practice. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast. www.math.umt.edu.com .
Prabawanto. 2009. Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Pendekatan Realistik untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Disposisi Matematik Siswa. Paper Workshop Nasional PMRI Dosen S1 Matematika PGSD di Hotel Cipaku Indah Bandung 27–30 Oktober 2009.
Rosa, M dan Orey, D.C. 2015. A Trivium Curriculum for Mathematics Based on Literacy, Matheracy, and Technorasy : an Ethnomathematics Perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education.
Russefendi, H.E.T. 2006. Pengantar Untuk Membantu Guru Mengembangkan Kompetensinya dalam Pengajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkaan CBSA. Bandung : Tarwijayasito
Savery, J.R. 2006. Overview of Problem-based Learning: Definitions and Distinction. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. Vol. 1 (1). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002.
Savery, J.R. & Duffy, T.M. 1995. Problem Based Learning: An Instructional Model and Its Constructivist Framework. Educational Technology. Vol. 35 (1).
Septianawati, T., 2013. Kemampuan Literasi Matematis. Artikel . http://tiaseptiana-wati.blogspot.co.id/2013/12/kemampuan-literasi-matematis.html. Diunduh 9 Maret 2016 pkl 15.00
Simanulang, J., 2013. Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Materi Himpunan Konteks Laskar Pelangi dengan Pendekatan Pendidkan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI) Kelas VII Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Nasional. http://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jpm/article/ view/1859 . Diakses 6 Maret 2015
Stacey, K. 2011. “The PISA View of Mathematical Literacy in Indonesiaâ€. IndoMS. J. M. E., 2(2).
Stacey, K. 2015. The PISA View of Mathematical Literacy in Indonesia. JME. www.IndoMS.com diakses 7 Maret 2015.
Sugiman dan Kusumah, Y. S. 2010. Dampak Pendidikan Matematika Realistik terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMP. JME. www.IndoMS-JME.com diakses 6 Maret 2015
Treffers, A. 1987. Three Dimensions a Model of Goal and Theory Description in Mathematics Education. Dordrecht: Reidel, The Wiscobas Project.
Wardono and Scolastika, M.. 2014. The Realistic Learning Model With Character Education And PISA Assesment To Improve Mathematics Literacy. International Journal of Education and Research. Vol.2 No. 7; 2014 ISSN: 2201-6333 (Print) ISSN: 2201-6740
Wardono, Budi, W, Kartono, Sukestiyarno, and Scolastika, M. 2015. The Realistic Scientific Humanist Learning with Character Education to Improve Mathematics Literacy Based on PISA. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(1).
Wardono, Budi, W., Scolastika, M. and S. Chandra, D. . 2016. Mathematics Literacy On Problem Based Learning With Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education Approach Assisted E-Learning Edmodo. Journal of Physics : Conference Series. Volume 693, Number 1; 2016. Journal indexing by Scopus http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/ 693/1/012014
Wardono, S. Mariani, P. Hendikawati, Ikayani. 2017. Mathematizing Process of Junior High School Students to Improve Mathematics Literacy Refers PISA on RCP Learning. Journal of Physics : Conference Series. Volume 824, Number 1; 2017. Journal indexing by Scopus. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/¬1742-6596/824/1/012049/meta
Wardono, et all. 2017. The Analysis of Mathematical Literacy on Realistic Problem-Based Learning With E-Edmodo Based On Student’s Self Efficacy. Article. Accepted in ICMSE 2017.
Wardono, Budi Waluya, Kartono, Mulyono, Mariani, S. 2017. Development of Innovative Problem Based Learning Model With PMRI-Scientific Approach Using ICT to Increase Mathematics Literacy and Independence-Character of Junior High School Students. Article. Accepted in ICMSE 2017.
Webb, D.C, Kooij, H.V.D, & Geist, M.R. 2011. Design Research in the Netherlands: Introducing Logarithms Using Realistic Mathematics Education. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 2: 47 – 52.www.tc.edu/jmetc diakses 6 Maret 2015.
Wijaya, A. 2012. Pendidikan Matematika Realistik.(Suatu Alternatif Pendekatan Pembelajaran Matematika). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Zaranis, N., Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. 2013. Using Mobile Devices for Teaching Realistic Mathematics in Kindergarten Education. Creative Education, 4(7A1).
Zieber. 2006. History, Philosophy, and Criticism of Problem Based Learning in Adult Education. Calgary: University http://p4mriundiksha.wordpress.com/2010/11/-16/standar-pmri/
http://www.4icu.org/topAsia. 16. 2016 University Web Rankings | Asia