Austin, J. L. (1962). How To Do Things with Words. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839429693-021
Carney, T. (2014). Being (im)polite: A forensic linguistic approach to interpreting a hate speech case. Language Matters, 45(3), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228195.2014.959545
Djanggih, H., & Qamar, N. (2018). Penerapan Teori-Teori Kriminologi dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan Siber [Implementation of Criminological Theories in Cyber Crime Prevention]. Pandecta: Research Law Journal, 13(1), 10–23.
Domaneschi, F., Passarelli, M., & Chiorri, C. (2017). Facial expressions and speech acts: experimental evidence on the role of the upper face as an illocutionary force indicating device in language comprehension. Cognitive Processing, 18(3), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-017-0809-6
Gultom, Elisatris, Didik, M. (2005). CYBER LAW Aspek Hukum Teknologi Informasi. PT Refika Aditama.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Kusno, A. (2015). Pelanggaran Prinsip Kesopanan pada Kasus Delik Penghinaan dan Pencemaran Nama Baik. Seminar Nasional PRASASTI II “Kajian Pragmatik Dalam Berbagai Bidang,” 88–93.
Lamintang dan C. Djisman Samosir. (1993). Delik-Delik Khusus. Tarsito.
Lee, E. L. (2016). Language and Culture. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.26
Licea-Haquet, G. L., Velásquez-Upegui, E. P., Holtgraves, T., & Giordano, M. (2019). Speech act recognition in Spanish speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 141, 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.12.013
Liu, S. (2011). An experimental study of the classification and recognition of Chinese speech acts. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1801–1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.10.031
Mills, S. (2003). Gender and politeness. Cambridge University Press.
Nisa, K., & Manaf, N. A. (2021). Analysis of Illocutionary Speech Acts on Student’s Social Media Post and Comments. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 10(1), 62–67.
Oishi, E. (2006). Austin’s Speech Act Theory and the Speech Situation. Esercizi Filosofici, 1–14. http://www2.units.it/eserfilo/art106/oishi106.pdf
Partodihardjo S. (2010). Kenali Narkoba dan Musuhi Penyalahgunaannya. Esensi.
Projodikoro, W. (1967). Tindak-tindak Pidana Tertentu di Indonesia. Bandung: PT. Eresco. PT. Eresco.
Rahardi, D. R. (2017). Perilaku pengguna dan informasi hoax di media sosial. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 5(1), 58–70.
Ružić, P. (2009). Rural tourism. Institute for Agriculture and Tourism Poreč.
Safrihady, S., & Mardikantoro, H. B. (2017). Jenis dan Fungsi Pragmatis Tindak Tutur Masyarakat Melayu Dialek Sambas di Kota Singkawang. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(1), 312. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/seloka/article/view/14766
Searle, J. (1979). A classification of illocutionary Acts. In: Language in society 5. Lang. Soc, 5, 1–24.
Sholihatin, E. (2020). an Analysis of Illocutionary and Perlocutionary Speech Act in Defamation Texts. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 7(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v7i1.1438
Subyantoro. (2019). Linguistik Forensik: Sumbangsih Kajian Bahasa dalam Penegakan HUKUM. ADIL Indonesia Journal, 1(1), 36–50.
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa (Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistis). Duta Wacana University Press.
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisi Bahasa. Sanata Dharma University Press.
Supriyono, A. Y., Zulaeha, I., & Yuniawan, T. (2020). The Humanist Expressive Speech Acts of Journalists in the Covid-19 Outbreak. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 9(3), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.15294/seloka.v9i3.41945
Wahyudi & Sukmasari. (2018). Teknologi dan Kehidupan Masyarakat. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi, 3(1), 13–24. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/227634-teknologi-dan-kehidupan-masyarakat-7686df94.pdf
Yuliyanti, T., Subyantoro, S., & Pristiwati, R. (2020). Form of Hate Speech Comments on Najwa Shihab Youtube Channels in The General Election Campaign of President and Vice President of The Republic of Indonesia 2019. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 9(3), 254–263.
- Abstract viewed - 376 times
- PDF downloaded - 394 times
Affiliations
Adibatina Hidayatillah
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Subyantoro Subyantoro
Indonesian Language Education, Faculty of Language and Art, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Haryadi Haryadi
Indonesian Language Education, Faculty of Language and Art, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
How to Cite
Types of Defamation Speech Acts on social media Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook in 2017-2019
Vol 10 No 2 (2021): August 2021
Submitted: Mar 9, 2021
Published: Aug 30, 2021
Abstract
Nowadays, technological advances make it easier for us to access many things. Technology, especially the internet, can be easily accessed so that everyone can use it without exception. Social media, which is the outcome of technological advances, certainly has some negative impacts. One of the most common impacts, especially in Indonesia, is the defamation speech act. This study discusses the types of defamation speech acts on social media in the 2017-2019 period. It is qualitative descriptive research employing a theoretical approach namely forensic pragmatics. The data in this study were speeches suspected to contain elements of defamation on social media Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook in 2017-2019 and violated the ITE Law Article 27 paragraph (3) which has pragmatic power in the form of speech and the type of impoliteness strategy. The data in this study were collected utilizing screenshots of posts on social media Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook in 2017-2019 containing elements of defamation and violating the ITE Law Article 27 paragraph (3). This study applied the observation method. The equivalent method was used to analyze the data. The results of this study show that 43.34% of the defamation speech acts are in the form of assertive illocutionary speech act, 40% of expressive illocutionary speech act, 10% of directive illocutionary act, and 33.33% commissive and declarative illocutionary speech act.