Burrow, Sylvia. (2010). Verbal Sparring and Apologenic Points: Politeness in Gendered Argumentation Context. Journal Informal Logic. Vol.30, No. 3: 235-262.
Deng, Jingyu & Zhou Xiaoling. (2013). A Corpus Study of Politeness Principle in Desperate Housewife Theory and Practice in Language Studies: ISSN 1799-2591, Vol.3 No. 11, pp. 1969-1974.
Djajasudarma, Fatimah. T. (1993). Metode Linguistik Ancangan Metode Penelitian dan Kajian. Bandung: PT.Eresco.
Eliya, I. & Ida Zulaeha. (2017). Pola Komunikasi Politik Ganjar Pranowo dalam Perspektif Sosiolinguistik di Media Sosial Instagram. Semarang: Seloka Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia UNNES. 6(3). 286-296.
Farida. (2013). Bentuk Kesantunan Respons Verbal Warga Belajar Paket B terhadap Tuturan Tutor di SKB Jepara. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Hafizul, Chair. (2015). Ketidaksantunan Berbahasa dalam Debat Calon Presiden dan Calon Wakil Presiden Tahun 2014. Sumatra Barat: UPT Perpus Unand.
Herfani, Febriani Khatimah. (2019). Tindak Tutur Komisif dan Ekspresif dalamDebat Capres-Cawapres pada Pilpres 2019. Ejournal UNP Vol. 8 No.1.
Istiqomah, Ria Rahmatul. (2013). Kampanye Politik di Televisi sebagai Budaya Populer. Jurnal Interaksi Undip. Vol. 2 No. 2.
Kallia, Alexandra. (2006). Linguistic Politeness: The Implicature Approach Citation Information Multilingua. Jurnal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication. Vol 23.
Klotz. Peter. (1999). Politeness and Political Correctness: Ideological Implication. Journal Linguistic Society. Vol. 9 Issue 1. p. 155-161.
Kridalaksana, Harimurti. (2011). Kamus Linguistik: Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Leech, Geoffrey. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. England: Oxford University Press.
Mahsun, M. (2007). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan, Strategi, Metode dan Tekniknya Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
Moleong, Lexy J. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Murphy, M., & Matas, C.P. (2006). Politeness in Intercultural E-Mail Communication. Handbook of Research on E-Learning Methodologies for Language Acquisition, 253-270.
Nababan, PWJ. (1984). Sosiolinguistik: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Rustono. (2017). Pragmatik. Semarang: CV. Kastara.
Singh, Shaivya, Rajesh Kumar, & Lata Atreya. (2014). Politeness in Language of Bihar: A Case Study of Bhojpuri, Magahi, dan Maithili. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication. Vol. 2 No.1 , 97-117.
Soekanto, Soejono & Sri Mamudji. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat). Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Suzila, T.S. Tengku Intan & M.N Mohd. Yusri. (2012). Politeness: Adolescents in Desagreements. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, Vol.2 No. 2, 127-132.
Taweel, Abeer Q. (2011). Hedging in Political Discourse. The Linguistic Journal. Vol. 5 Issue 1. 169-196
Wijayanti, Wenny & Ida Zulaeha. (2015). Pengembangan bahan Ajar Interaktif Kompetensi Memproduksi Teks Prosedur Kompleks yang bermuatan kesantunan bagi Peserta Didik kelas X SMA/MA. Semarang: Seloka Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia UNNES. Vol 4.
Ziraluo, Merdina. (2019). Analisis Tindak Tutur Lokusi, Ilokusi, dan Perlokusi pada Debat Capres-Cawapres Republik Indonesia tahun 2019. Jurnal IPTS. Vol. 8 No.2 Edisi Mei.
Deng, Jingyu & Zhou Xiaoling. (2013). A Corpus Study of Politeness Principle in Desperate Housewife Theory and Practice in Language Studies: ISSN 1799-2591, Vol.3 No. 11, pp. 1969-1974.
Djajasudarma, Fatimah. T. (1993). Metode Linguistik Ancangan Metode Penelitian dan Kajian. Bandung: PT.Eresco.
Eliya, I. & Ida Zulaeha. (2017). Pola Komunikasi Politik Ganjar Pranowo dalam Perspektif Sosiolinguistik di Media Sosial Instagram. Semarang: Seloka Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia UNNES. 6(3). 286-296.
Farida. (2013). Bentuk Kesantunan Respons Verbal Warga Belajar Paket B terhadap Tuturan Tutor di SKB Jepara. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Hafizul, Chair. (2015). Ketidaksantunan Berbahasa dalam Debat Calon Presiden dan Calon Wakil Presiden Tahun 2014. Sumatra Barat: UPT Perpus Unand.
Herfani, Febriani Khatimah. (2019). Tindak Tutur Komisif dan Ekspresif dalamDebat Capres-Cawapres pada Pilpres 2019. Ejournal UNP Vol. 8 No.1.
Istiqomah, Ria Rahmatul. (2013). Kampanye Politik di Televisi sebagai Budaya Populer. Jurnal Interaksi Undip. Vol. 2 No. 2.
Kallia, Alexandra. (2006). Linguistic Politeness: The Implicature Approach Citation Information Multilingua. Jurnal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication. Vol 23.
Klotz. Peter. (1999). Politeness and Political Correctness: Ideological Implication. Journal Linguistic Society. Vol. 9 Issue 1. p. 155-161.
Kridalaksana, Harimurti. (2011). Kamus Linguistik: Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Leech, Geoffrey. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. England: Oxford University Press.
Mahsun, M. (2007). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan, Strategi, Metode dan Tekniknya Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
Moleong, Lexy J. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Murphy, M., & Matas, C.P. (2006). Politeness in Intercultural E-Mail Communication. Handbook of Research on E-Learning Methodologies for Language Acquisition, 253-270.
Nababan, PWJ. (1984). Sosiolinguistik: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Rustono. (2017). Pragmatik. Semarang: CV. Kastara.
Singh, Shaivya, Rajesh Kumar, & Lata Atreya. (2014). Politeness in Language of Bihar: A Case Study of Bhojpuri, Magahi, dan Maithili. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication. Vol. 2 No.1 , 97-117.
Soekanto, Soejono & Sri Mamudji. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat). Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Suzila, T.S. Tengku Intan & M.N Mohd. Yusri. (2012). Politeness: Adolescents in Desagreements. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, Vol.2 No. 2, 127-132.
Taweel, Abeer Q. (2011). Hedging in Political Discourse. The Linguistic Journal. Vol. 5 Issue 1. 169-196
Wijayanti, Wenny & Ida Zulaeha. (2015). Pengembangan bahan Ajar Interaktif Kompetensi Memproduksi Teks Prosedur Kompleks yang bermuatan kesantunan bagi Peserta Didik kelas X SMA/MA. Semarang: Seloka Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia UNNES. Vol 4.
Ziraluo, Merdina. (2019). Analisis Tindak Tutur Lokusi, Ilokusi, dan Perlokusi pada Debat Capres-Cawapres Republik Indonesia tahun 2019. Jurnal IPTS. Vol. 8 No.2 Edisi Mei.
- Abstract viewed - 130 times
- PDF downloaded - 132 times
Affiliations
Andy Kusworo
SMPN 24 Semarang
Rustono Rustono
Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang
Hari Bakti Mardikantoro
Universitas Negeri Semarang
How to Cite
Kusworo, A., Rustono, R., & Mardikantoro, H. B. (2022). Violation of the Politeness Principle in the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Debates 2019 Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 11(1), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.15294/seloka.v11i2.55956
Violation of the Politeness Principle in the Presidential and Vice-Presidential Debates 2019 Presidential and Vice-Presidential Elections
Vol 11 No 1 (2022): April 2022
Submitted: Apr 6, 2022
Published: Apr 30, 2022
Abstract
Politeness in speaking the presidential and vice-presidential candidates in the 2019 presidential and vice-presidential election debates is an interesting phenomenon to be studied from a pragmatic perspective because social and verbal interactions will appear naturally. The purpose of this study is to analyze and describe the form of violations of the politeness principle according to Leech (2014) committed by presidential and vice-presidential candidates in the presidential and vice-presidential election debates of the Republic of Indonesia in 2019. This study uses a pragmatic approach, namely using the politeness theory proposed by Leech (2014). Data collection techniques using listening and note-taking techniques. The data analysis technique was carried out using normative techniques. The results of this study were found to be violations of Leech's five principles of politeness, namely (1) the thimble of feeling, (2) the thimble of approval, (3) the thimble of humility, (4) the thimble of agreement, and (5) the thimble of opinion.