Amsel, E., & Byrnes, P.J. (2002). Language, Literacy, and Cognitive Development. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A Schema-Theoretic View of Basic Processes in Reading Comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 255-291). New York: Longman, Inc.
Aryanta, K A, Wendra, I.W & Wartawan, I.G. (2014). Penggunaan Teknik 5W+1H untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Memahami Unsur Intrinsik Cerpen Melalui Membaca Kritis di Kelas VII C SMP Negeri 3 Singaraja. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Undiksha, 2(1): 1-12.
Bartlett, L. (2008). Literacy’s Verb: Exploring What Literacy is and What Literacy Does. International Journal of Educational Development, 28(6): 737–753.
Beyer, B.K. (1987). Practical Strategies for the Teaching of Thinking. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston.
Budiman, H. (2016). Penggunaan Media Visual Dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(11): 171-182.
Cavilla, D. (2017). The Effects of Student Reflection on Academic Performance and Motivation. SAGE Open.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017733790
Cohen, L. Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. Oxon: Routledge.
Denhas, K.N, & Bharati, D.W. (2017). The Relationship between Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge, Home Literacy, and English Reading Comprehension Achievement. English Education Journal, 7(3): 247 - 254.
Dorn, L.J., & Soffos, C. (2005). Teaching for Deep Comprehension. Maine: Stenhouse Publishers.
Farboy, S. (2013). Penerapan Metode Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menemukan Gagasan Utama Sebuah Teks Pada Siswa Kelas VII di SMP Negeri 3 Batu Tahun Ajaran 2008/2009. Jurnal Artikulasi, 7(1): 415-431.
Fitri, E., Zola, N., & Ifdil. (2018). “Profil Kepercayaan Diri Remaja serta Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(1): 1-5.
Gani, S.A., Yusuf, Y.Q., & Susiani, R. (2016). Progressive Outcomes of Collaborative Strategic Reading to EFL Learners. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 37(1): 144 -149.
Gilakjani, A.P. (2016). How Can Students Improve Their Reading Comprehension Skill?. Journal of Studies in Education, 6(2): 229 – 240.
Gredler, M.E. (2013). Learning and Instruction - Teori dan Aplikasi Edisi Keenam. Jakarta: Prenada Media Grup.
Harsono, A.S.R., Fuady, A., & Saddhono, K. (2012). Pengaruh Strategi Know Want to Learn (KWL) dan Minat Membaca terhadap Kemampuan Membaca Intensif Siswa SMP Negeri di Temanggung. BASASTRA: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia dan Pengajarannya, 1(1): 35-64.
Iswara, P.D. (2016). Pengembangan Materi Ajar dan Evaluasi Pada Keterampilan Mendengarkan dan Membaca. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 3(1): 89-97.
Karabuga, F., & Kaya, E.S. (2013). Collaborative Strategic Reading Practice with Adult EFL Learners: a Collaborative and Reflective Approach to Reading. Procidia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 106 (1): 621-630.
Mansyur, M., Rahamma, T., & Fatima, J.M. (2013). Kemampuan Literasi Media Visual Siswa dan Keberhasilan Pembelajaran Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (TIK) di SMP Negeri 11 Pare-Pare. Jurnal Komunikasi KAREBA, 2 (4): 379-385.
Mashuri, I. (2011). Implementasi Literasi Informasi di Sekolah. Pustakaloka, 3(1): 61-72.
Miles, M. B., & Hubberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Oxenham, J. (2008). Effective Literacy Programmes: Options for Policy Makers. Paris: UNESCO.
Pancarrani, B., Amroh, I.W., & Noorfitrian, Y. (2017). Peran Literasi Orang Tua dalam Perkembangan Anak. Bibliotika: Jurnal Kajian Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 1(2): 23-27.
Phantharakphong, P., & Pothitha, S. (2014). Development of English Reading Comprehension by Using Concept Maps. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116: 497 – 501.
Saepudin, A., Sulistyorini, S., & Utanto, Y. (2019). The Effectiveness of GIST (Generating Interaction between Schemata and Text) and KWL (Know, Want to Know, Learned) Strategies on Students English Literacy towards Learning Motivation. Innovative Journal of Curriculum and Educational, 8(2): 51-58.
Setiawan, A., Nugroho, S.W., Budiatmodjo, E., Ramadani, K.D., & Maylasari, I. (2015). Statistik Sosial Budaya. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
Shunk, D.H. (2012). Learning Theorities an Educational Perspetive, Sixth Edition. Diterjemahkan oleh Eva Hamdiah dan Rahmat Fajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Suragangga, I.M.N. (2017). “Mendidik Lewat Literasi untuk Pendidikan Berkualitasâ€. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 3(2) 154-163.
Wang, T. (2019). Competence for Students’ Future: Curriculum Change and Policy Redesign in China. ECNU Review of Education, 2(2): 234–245.
Wenr.wes.org. (March 21, 2019). Education System Profiles. Access retrived 20th October 2019, from
https://wenr.wes.org/2019/03/education-in-indonesia-2
Wong, A.C.K. (2016). Considering Reflection From the Student Perspective in Higher Education. SAGE Open.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016638706
www.oecd.org. (2015). Assesment Framwork. Access retrived 12th December 2017, from
https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf
Zhang, L. (2018). Metacognitive and Cognitive Strategy Use in Reading Comprehension. Singapore: Springer.
- Abstract viewed - 251 times
- pdf downloaded - 5397 times
Affiliations
Aep Saepudin
Curriculum Development, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Elinda Umisara
English Language Education, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
How to Cite
The Supporting of Schemata as Integrated Strategy in Reading Literacy: A Qualitative Study
Vol 9 No 1 (2020): June 2020
Submitted: Nov 8, 2019
Published: Nov 8, 2019
Abstract
The schemata are conceptual frameworks that are in the form of design process for translating the particular idea, where the reading activities require the proper scheme in understanding the information. The students read with traditional technique that has not yet to build the perspective information. There should be an evaluation of the strategy for integrating information, so the purpose of this research provides an overview of how the schemata role integrating the students reading literacy. The population of this research is the student in eighth grade at SMPN 1 Lebakwangi. This method of research is qualitative descriptive with case study design. The results show the potential schemata providing the significance in students’ reading literacy, where students can identify the information, synthesize information and facilitate information. Three stages use for generating information based on the perspective built through the schemata stages. The implications of this study provide an insight into concept mapping information in reading literacy. There are schemata as strategy to divide information based on the questions and make summarization. It takes the students to convey information becoming a critical reader by eliminating inappropriate information.