Cover Image

Evaluation of Competency Test and Work Competency Certification Implementations at Professional Certification Institute - First Party (LSP P1)

Arif Rosyid

Abstract


The challenge of vocational education is to produce competent and competitive prospective workers. Competency certification is a strategic step to improve the quality of Vocational High School graduates. For Vocational High School LSP P1 implementing the work competency certification, its function is not optimal and its independence is questionable. Vocational High School LSP P1  is only 4% compared to the number of Vocational High Schools and the graduates. Evaluation for Vocational High School LSP P1 was conducted to find out how the implementation of competency tests and work competency certification. This research aims to evaluate the implementation of competency test and work competency certification at LSP P1, in terms of the component variables of Context, Input, Process, and Product. This research is a descriptive evaluative research using the CIPP evaluation model approach. The research population was Vocational High School LSP P1 assessors from 9 Vocational High Schools in Pekalongan Regency and its surroundings. The sample was the research population who served as competency test assessors at LSP P1. Data collection methods in this research were questionnaire, interview, and document study. The content validity testing was by expert judgment, while the construct validity testing was by correlation analysis. The reliability test used Alpha Cronbach. The data analysis technique was quantitative descriptive analysis. Furthermore, it was analyzed by changing the scores for the context, input, process, and product components into a T-Score and then categorized them by the Glickman Quadrant. The research results were as follows; (1) in the context component, the percentage was F + = 66% and F - = 34% meaning that the implementation of competency test in terms of context variables is categorized as effective, (2) for the input component, the percentage was F + = 61% and F - = 39%, indicating that the implementation of competency test in terms of input variable is categorized as effective, (3) for the process component, the percentage was F + = 66% and F - = 34%, meaning that the implementation of competency test in terms of process variable is categorized as effective, (4) for the product component, the percentage was F + = 59% and F - = 41%, indicating that the implementation of competency test in terms of the product variable is categorized as effective, (5) T-score analysis of the four CIPP components, namely context, input, process, and product were (+ + + +) in the criteria of the Glickman Quadrant that were included in quadrant I, meaning that evaluation of the implementation of competency tests and work competency certification at LSP P1 in terms of all CIPP components is in the very effective or excellent category.

Keywords


Competency Test, Work Competency Certification, CIPP Evaluation Model

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, Suharsimi & Jabar, A. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. PT. Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S. (2016). Manajemen Penelitian. PT. Rineka Cipta.

Badan Nasional Sertifikasi Profesi. (2013). Peraturan BNSP 305 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Uji Kompetensi oleh Panitia Teknis BNSP.

BNSP. (2017). XII Tahun BNSP : Tantangan & Perkembangan (Sumarna F Abdurrahman (ed.)). Badan Nasional Sertifikasi Profesi (BNSP).

Direktorat SMK. (2019). 4 . 083 SMK Mendapatkan Akses Sertifikasi Kompetensi Melalui LSP P1. http://psmk.kemdikbud.go.id/konten/4214/4083-smk-mendapatkan-akses-sertifikasi-kompetensi-melalui-lsp-p1-smk-dan-jejaring-kerjanya

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2016). Revitalisasi Pendidikan Vokasi (Ananto Kusumo (ed.)). Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kementerian Setneg RI. (2018). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 10 tahun 2018 tentang Badan Nasional Sertifikasi Profesi.

Leigh, Smith, Bebeau, Lichtenberg, Nelson, Portnoy, Rubin, & K. (2007). Competency assessment models. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 38(5), 463–473. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.38.5.463

Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Nontes. In Mitra Cendikia Press. Mitra Cendikia Press.

Parmadi, I. K., Dantes, N., & Marhaeni, A. A. I. N. (2013). STUDI PENGEMBANGAN DIRI PADA SMP NEGERI DI KECAMATAN NEGARA. 3.

Sekretariat Kabinet. (2016). Instruksi Presiden Nomor 9 tahun 2016 tentang Revitalisasi Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan.

Sekretariat Negara. (2012). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 8 tahun 2012 tentang Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Sukmadinata, S. N. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kelima). Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia dan PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.

Usman, H., & Akbar, P. (2012). Pengantar Statistika (Edisi Kedu). PT. Bumi Aksara.

Widoyoko. (2012). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Penelitian (Edisi ke 5). Pustaka Pelajar.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jvce.v5i2.26946

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


PASCASARJANA UNNES,
Gedung A Kampus Kelud, Semarang 50233
Telp. +62248440516, +62248449017
Faks. +62248449969
Website: http://pps.unnes.ac.id

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
p-ISSN 2339-0344e-ISSN 2503-2305