The Principle of Justice as a Judges' Considerations in the Concept of Third-Party Responsibility Against Cooperative Legal Action Case Study of Supreme Court Verdict No. 250K/PDT/2019
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research critically examines and evaluates the judicial considerations in Supreme Court Decision Number 250 K/Pdt/2019, specifically focusing on the third parties' responsibility in connection with the Audi Et Alteram Partem principle, a pivotal aspect of the broader justice as fairness principle. Conducted as normative legal research, the study involves a qualitative analysis of data gathered through comprehensive library research. The qualitative data is systematically categorized and correlated to address the research questions accurately, facilitating a comprehensive understanding of the topic. The findings indicate that the Panel of Judges in Supreme Court Decision Number 250K/Pdt/2019, along with Decision Number 204/Pdt/2018/PT SMG and Decision Number 20/Pdt.G/2017/ PN Kds, effectively applied the Audi Et Alteram Partem principle, demonstrating a commitment to the overarching principle of justice as fairness. Notably, the panel made fair decisions while overlooking the conventional concepts of cooperatives and the responsibilities of the board of directors. The study suggests a pressing need for relevant stakeholders to promptly enact updated legislation concerning cooperatives to address emerging challenges and align with contemporary legal perspectives.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All works published in The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence are licensed & copyrighted under a Creative Commons Attribution Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. Under this license, the authors published in The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence retain the copyright. All other authors using the content of The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence are required to cite the author(s) and publisher in their work.
References
Agustina, Rosa. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Hukum Perjanjian”. Thesis (Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia, 2003).
Amal, Muhammad Ridha Haykal. Hukum Koperasi dan UKM. (Medan: Pustaka Prima, 2021).
Asmara, Teguh Tresna Puja, Tarsisius Murwadji, and Bambang Daru Nugroho. "Tanggung Jawab Pemilik Koperasi Pada Saat Terjadi Kredit Macet Ditinjau dari Teori Kepastian Hukum." Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 8, no. 1 (2020): 109-126.
Christian, Jordy Herry. " Juridical Study of Unlawful Acts as Factors in Cancellation of Auctions on Guaranteed Objects (Kajian Yuridis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Sebagai Faktor Pembatalan Lelang Atas Objek Jaminan)." Lex Scientia Law Review 3, no. 2 (2019): 205-218.
Faiz, Pan Mohamad. "Teori Keadilan John Rawls (John Rawls' Theory of Justice)." Jurnal Konstitusi 6, no. 1 (2009): 135-149.
Fuady, Munir. Contemporary Approach Unlawful Acts (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002).
Harahap, Yahya. Power of the Supreme Court: Cassation Examination and Review of Civil Cases (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014).
Joint Decision Letter Between the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia and the Chairperson of the Judicial Commission Number 047/KMA/SKB/IV/2009 Concerning the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct for Judges, 2009.
Junaidi, Junaidi, and M. Martindo Merta. "Asas Hakim Pasif Dalam Reglement Op de Rechtsvordering (RV) dan Prinsip Hakim Aktif dalam Herziene Indonesisch Reglement (HIR) dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan." Qistie 13, no. 1 (2020): 60-77.
Kamalrullah, Rayhan Zhafrandy. “Gugatan Anggota Koperasi terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum yang Dilakukan oleh Ketua Koperasi Serba Usaha Modern Kudus (Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 250 K/PDT/2019)”. Thesis (Purwokerto: Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, 2021).
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2005).
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Indonesian Civil Procedure Law (Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2012).
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar (Yogyakarta: Liberty Yogyakarta, 2008).
Mulyadi, Lilik. "Pergeseran Perspektif dan Praktik dari Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Mengenai Putusan Pemidanaan." Majalah Varia Peradilan 6 (2006): 1-17.
Pogge, Thomas. John Rawls: His Life and Theory of Justice. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).
Pramono, Nindyo, and Sularto. Bankruptcy Law and Pancasila Justice (Jakarta: Andi Publishers, 2017)
Purnamasari, Dewa Ayu Putu Mita, I. Nyoman Putu Budiartha, and Desak Gde Dwi Arin. "Tanggung Jawab Debitur dalam Perjanjian Kredit Tanpa Agunan (KTA) Pada Koperasi Serba Usaha (KSU) Kuta Imba Kabupaten Badung." Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum 2, no. 2 (2021): 334-338.
Rawls, John. "A Theory of Justice." In Applied ethics. (London: Routledge, 2017), pp. 21-29.
Republic of Indonesia. Decision Number 20/Pdt.G/2017/PN Kds
Republic of Indonesia. Decision Number 204/Pdt/2018/PT SMG
Republic of Indonesia. Indonesian Civil Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata).
Republic of Indonesia. Supreme Court Decision number 250K/Pdt/2019
Republic of Indonesia. Supreme Court Regulation Number 13 of 2016 concerning How to Handle Criminal Cases by Corporations (Supreme Court, Indonesia, 2016).
Rohmat, Aji Basuki. "Analisis Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Koperasi Dalam Undang-Undang Koperasi (Studi Undang-Undang No. 25 Tahun 1992 dan Undang-Undang No. 17 Tahun 2012)." Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 2, no. 1 (2016): 138-147.
Salam, Syukron. "Perkembangan Doktrin Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Penguasa." Nurani Hukum 1, no. 1 (2018): 33-44.
Saputra, Rian. "Pergeseran Prinsip Hakim Pasif ke Aktif Pada Praktek Peradilan Perdata Perspektif Hukum Progresif." Wacana Hukum 2, no. 1 (2019): 10-18.
Soepomo, R. Civil Procedure Law of District Courts (Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2006).
Sunarto, Sunarto. "Prinsip Hakim Aktif dalam Perkara Perdata." Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan 5, no. 2 (2016): 249-276.
Sunarto, Sunarto. Peran Aktif Hakim dalam Perkara Perdata (Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2016).
Susylawati, Eka. "The Judge Principle is Active in Case of Divorce in Madura District Religious Court." AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial 14, no. 2 (2019): 267-282.
Wijayanta, Tata, et al. "Penerapan Prinsip Hakim Pasif dan Aktif serta Relevansinya terhadap Konsep Kebenaran Formal." Mimbar Hukum 22, no. 3 (2010): 572-587.
Yunanto, Yunanto. "Menerjemahkan Keadilan dalam Putusan Hakim." Jurnal Hukum Progresif 7, no. 2 (2019): 192-205.
Zain, Mochamad Adib. "Politik Hukum Koperasi di Indonesia (Tinjauan Yuridis Historis Pengaturan Perkoperasian di Indonesia)." Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 2, no. 3 (2015): 160-177.