Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  • The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
  • The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
  • Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
  • The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font; employs italics, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
  • The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.

Author Guidelines

The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence will publish the only paper strictly following Journal guidelines and manuscript preparation. All submitted manuscripts are going through a double-blind peer review process. This journal is published regularly every six months (twice a year) and provides fully open access to ensure the accessibility of everyone in developing knowledge. The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence publishes research or conceptual articles in the field of legal studies, especially focusing on the study of court decisions and legal studies. The Journal published within Bahasa and English both print and online version. The Digest is also intended to be Indonesian and International forum for discussion and analysis of court decision. Each issue on The Digest: Journal of Jurisprudence and Legisprudence includes insightful analysis and discussion on court decision.

Review Policy
Manuscripts submitted will be subject to reviews by an editorial team board and a peer reviewer who are experts and familiar with the relevant field of research. After review process, the Managing Editor will inform the authors of the acceptance, rejection, or necessity of revision of the manuscript. All manuscript submitted will undergo the first stage of the review process carried out by the Internal Editor, which includes: suitability of the manuscript with focus and scope, manuscript template; writing standards (including the number of words), and similarity (plagiarism check by Turnitin). Regarding plagiarism check, the percentage limit allowed does not exceed 25%. After passing the first stage, the manuscript will be sent to be processed in the second stage, namely the review process (through a double- blind peer-review system).

 

Paper Format

The Manuscript Should Has A Concise and Descriptive Title, No More than 16 Words

 

Author’s name, affiliation, and email should be hidden due to our blind review policy. Please write author’s profile in a separate file

 

 

ABSTRACT

All articles should be accompanied by an abstract between 250-300 words in 12 point Adobe Caslon Pro, single space. The abstract should be clear, concise, and descriptive. This abstract should provide a brief introduction to the problem, objective of the paper, followed by a statement regarding the methodology and a brief summary of results.

KEYWORDS: please mention at least three keywords that describe the manuscript.

  I. INTRODUCTION

The introduction describes the background of the article discussed as a whole. The introduction should be written clearly and succinctly, between 3-5 paragraphs only, comprising: (a) an adequate background and significance of your paper; (b) concise previous studies related to the title; (c) the main limitation of the previous studies and what you hope to achieve (to solve the limitation); (d) the scientific merit or novelties of your paper; (e) the aim of the study; (f) structure of the article or research questions.

Please note that all writings should be in the paragraph format; this journal discourages the author(s) from writing point per point in the numbering format. The manuscript written uses Adobe Caslon Pro Fonts (14 pt), 1.15 pt space with a length of 6,000-8,000 words (including footnotes).

The method part should not in specific chapter. The author should put and explain the method at the end of introduction part. The method is written in descriptive and should provide a statement regarding the methodology of the research. The method as much as possible to give an idea to the reader through the methods used.

 

 II. RESULT AND DISCUSSION I

This section is the most important section of your article. The analysis or results of the research should be clear and concise. The results should summarize (scientific) findings rather than providing data in great detail. Please highlight the differences between your results or findings and the previous publications by other researchers.

Heading in the discussion section should be consistently written with the structure of the article in the introduction. Headings in this discussion use Roman letters (I., II., III., etc.; you can add more than one part of the discussion, it depends on your structure of the discussion you want to write).

Your paragraph…………………….………………………………...………

……………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………….

 

  1. Second-Level Heading in Bold (Sub-discussion)

Following the main headings, sub-heading is provided in the manuscript.

Your paragraph…………………….………………………………...………

……………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………….

 

  1. Third-level heading

Following main headings and sub-heading, the journal allows the authors to use third-level heading (sub-sub headings), which should be numbered in 1., 2., 3., etc. Write more your paragraph …..…………………………….……

Your paragraph…………………….………………………………...………

……………………………………………………………………………….

……………………………………………………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………….……………………………………………………………………………….

 

III. CONCLUSION

The conclusion should be written concisely between 1-2 paragraphs only. It should answer the objectives of the research. Please provide a clear and concise conclusion. Do not repeat the abstract or simply describe the results of the research. Give a clear explanation regarding the possible application and/or suggestions related to the research findings.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The author(s) may recognize those who helped in the research, especially funding supporters of your research. Include individuals who have assisted you in your study: Advisors, Financial supporters, or may other supporters i.e., Proof-readers, Typists, and Suppliers who may have given materials.

 

COMPETING INTEREST

The author(s) will be asked to sign this statement once the submission has been accepted.

 

REFERENCES

Footnotes must use the American Psychological Association (APA) Style. In order to simplify writing in the McGill Guide footnotes, the authors are advised to use Mendeley software, which can be downloaded here. All references should be cited in the body of text and vice versa.

 

Example of References (in APA style), arranged alphabetically

 

Bar-Siman-Tov, I. (2012). Semiprocedural Judicial Review. Legisprudence, 6(3), 271-300.

Cipta, R. E., & Masyhar, A. (2021). Controversial Criminal Punishment for Victim of the Spread of Immoral Chat. Unnes Law Journal: Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang7(1), 23-46. https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v7i1.38746

Fuqoha, F. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Kekuatan Hukum Penyelesian Perselisihan non-Litigasi dalam Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev)2(2), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v2i2.37681

Najih, M. (2018). Indonesian Penal Policy: Toward Indonesian Criminal Law Reform Based on Pancasila. JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)3(2), 149-174.

Shahid, S. (2021). Sterner Response toward Rape in line with Islamic Law: Special Reference to Pakistan. Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services3(1), 51-90. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v3i1.45597

Supriyono, S., & Prakasa, S. U. W. (2021). Juridical Review of Illegal Fishing in Indonesia as Transnational Crime. Law Research Review Quarterly7(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v7i2.45056

West, R. (1988). Jurisprudence and Gender. The University of Chicago Law Review55(1), 1-72.

Wintgens, L. (Ed.). (2002). Legisprudence: A New Theoretical Approach to Legislation. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.