Legal Uncertainty Over Notary Protocols in Law Number 43 of 2009
Main Article Content
Abstract
The storage and maintenance Minutes of Notary Deed is the responsibility of the notary as mandated in Article 1 Number 13 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions. Law Number 43 of 2009 concerning Archives does not regulate the implementation of protocol archives as state archives, so that in this case it creates legal uncertainty for notaries in storing and maintaining. This research was conducted to find out whether the digitization system can be applied in the notary protocol and how the form of the notary's accountability to the notary protocol as a state archive. This research is normative research with analytical descriptive nature. It can be concluded that the digitalization system for storing minutes of deeds with electronic media explicitly does not have any statutory provisions that regulate it. The existence of this norm vacuum has resulted in the legality of the activity of making and storing minutes of deed electronically doubtful if it is applied because it is considered not in accordance with the function and purpose of an authentic deed. As for the form of the notary's accountability to the notary protocol as a state archive, in this case, it is linked based on the expiration time limit of the prosecution, which will ensure legal certainty until when a notary must be responsible for the deed he made, both accountability in criminal law and in civil law.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
References
Adjie. Habib., 2009. Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif terhadap Notaris sebagai Pejabat Publik. Cet. 2, Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Afriana. Anita., 2020. Kedudukan dan Tanggungjawab Notaris sebagai Pihak dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Indonesia terkait Akta yang Dibuatnya. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjajaran, Vol.1, No.2.
Ali. Achmad., 2012. Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicial Prudance). Jakarta: Kencana Prenanda Media Group.
Amsyah. Zulkifli., 2001. Manajeman Kearsipan, Cet. Ke-9. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Anand. Ghansham., 2018. Karakteristik Jabatan Notaris di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Basuki. Sulistyo., 2005. Kamus Istilah Kearsipan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Kuswanto, Mohammad Riza and Hari Purwadi. 2017. Urgensi Penyimpanan Protokol Notaris dalam Bantuk Elektronik dan Kepastian Hukumnya di Indonesia. Jurnal Repertorium, Volume IV, No. 2.
Mahaputera. Wahid Ashari., 2021. Perlindungan Hukum dan Pertanggungjawaban Bagi Notaris yang Menjadi Turut Tergugat terhadap Akta yang Telah Dibuatnya. Jurnal Indonesian Notary, Vol. 3, No. 2.
Makarim. Edmon., 2013. Buku Seri Hukum Telematika: Notaris dan Transaksi Elektronik. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Marzuki. Peter Mahmud., 2009. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Cet. 2, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mertokusumo. Sudikno., 2002. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Edisi Keenam. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Nisa. Naily Zahrotun., 2020. Aspek Legalitas Penyimpanan Minuta Akta Notaris Secara Elektronik. Jurnal Civic Hukum, Volume 5, Nomor 2.
Notodisoerjo. R. Soegondo., 1993. Hukum Notariat di Indonesia Suatu Penjelasan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Pribadi. Insan., 2018. Legalitas Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, Vol. 3 (1).
Putranto. Widiatmoko Adi., 2017. Pengelolaan Arsip di Era Digital: Mempertimbangkan Kembali Sudut Pandang Pengguna. Jurnal Diplomatik, Vol. 1, No. 1 September, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.
Republic of Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN).
Republic of Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 43 Tahun 2009 tentang Kearsipan.
Rosatawati, Desy, I Made Arya Utama, and Desak Putu Dewi Kasih. 2017. Penyimpanan Protokol Notaris secara Elektronik dalam Kaitan Cyber Notary. Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Magister Kenotariatan, 2017-2018 Universitas Udayana, Acta Comunitas (2017) 2.
Setiadewi. Kadek., 2020. Legalitas Akta Notaris Berbasis Cyber Notary sebagai Akta Otentik. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Vol. 6 (2).
Sjafurrachman. 2011. Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta. Surabaya: CV. Mandar Maju.
Sunggono. Bambang., 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.