Legal Uncertainty Over Notary Protocols in Law Number 43 of 2009

Main Article Content

Nurwanty Setiawan
Nynda Fatmawati Octarina

Abstract

The storage and maintenance Minutes of Notary Deed is the responsibility of the notary as mandated in Article 1 Number 13 of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions. Law Number 43 of 2009 concerning Archives does not regulate the implementation of protocol archives as state archives, so that in this case it creates legal uncertainty for notaries in storing and maintaining. This research was conducted to find out whether the digitization system can be applied in the notary protocol and how the form of the notary's accountability to the notary protocol as a state archive. This research is normative research with analytical descriptive nature. It can be concluded that the digitalization system for storing minutes of deeds with electronic media explicitly does not have any statutory provisions that regulate it. The existence of this norm vacuum has resulted in the legality of the activity of making and storing minutes of deed electronically doubtful if it is applied because it is considered not in accordance with the function and purpose of an authentic deed. As for the form of the notary's accountability to the notary protocol as a state archive, in this case, it is linked based on the expiration time limit of the prosecution, which will ensure legal certainty until when a notary must be responsible for the deed he made, both accountability in criminal law and in civil law.

Article Details

How to Cite
Setiawan, N., & Octarina, N. F. (2022). Legal Uncertainty Over Notary Protocols in Law Number 43 of 2009. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 3(4), 543-566. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v3i4.58654
Section
Review Article
Author Biographies

Nurwanty Setiawan, Faculty of Law, Universitas Narotama

Nurwanty Setiawan is a researcher and postrgraduate student at the Master of Notary of Faculty of Law, Universitas Narotama, Surabaya Indonesia.

Nynda Fatmawati Octarina, Faculty of Law, Universitas Narotama

Dr. Nynda Fatmawati Octarina, S.H., M.H., is a faculty member and lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Narotama, Surabaya Indonesia. Some of her works have been published on several journals and books, such as Penyelenggaraan Jaminan Sosial Kecelakaan Kerja Bagi Pegawai Negeri Sipil Sesuai Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 Tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara (Perspektif 27 (3), 168-179, 2022), Progressive Legal Views on the Implementation of the Omnibus Law Method in Indonesia (Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal, 2022), Analysis of Legal Certainty for Buyers who have paid the payment of Ownership of Flat Units that Have Not Received a Certificate (Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 13 (1), 2022), Pelaksanaan Verzet Terhadap Eksekusi dalam Perkara Perdata (Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan 6 (1), 225-239, 2022), Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Kepemilikan Unit Rumah Susun Yang Belum Memperoleh Sertifikat Hak Milik Satuan (Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 13 (1), 38-48, 2022), and The Application of the Conditio Sine Qua Non Principle on the Crime of Damage through Social Media (Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal 7 (1), 74-92, 2022). She obtained a bacholer degree of law (SH) from Universitas Narotama Surabaya Indonesia and Master and Doctoral Degree from Univeritas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

References

Adjie. Habib., 2007. Hukum Notaris Indonesia, Tafsir Tematik terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Surabaya: Refika Aditama.

Adjie. Habib., 2009. Sanksi Perdata dan Administratif terhadap Notaris sebagai Pejabat Publik. Cet. 2, Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Afriana. Anita., 2020. Kedudukan dan Tanggungjawab Notaris sebagai Pihak dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Indonesia terkait Akta yang Dibuatnya. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjajaran, Vol.1, No.2.

Ali. Achmad., 2012. Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicial Prudance). Jakarta: Kencana Prenanda Media Group.

Amsyah. Zulkifli., 2001. Manajeman Kearsipan, Cet. Ke-9. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Anand. Ghansham., 2018. Karakteristik Jabatan Notaris di Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Basuki. Sulistyo., 2005. Kamus Istilah Kearsipan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Kuswanto, Mohammad Riza and Hari Purwadi. 2017. Urgensi Penyimpanan Protokol Notaris dalam Bantuk Elektronik dan Kepastian Hukumnya di Indonesia. Jurnal Repertorium, Volume IV, No. 2.

Mahaputera. Wahid Ashari., 2021. Perlindungan Hukum dan Pertanggungjawaban Bagi Notaris yang Menjadi Turut Tergugat terhadap Akta yang Telah Dibuatnya. Jurnal Indonesian Notary, Vol. 3, No. 2.

Makarim. Edmon., 2013. Buku Seri Hukum Telematika: Notaris dan Transaksi Elektronik. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Marzuki. Peter Mahmud., 2009. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Cet. 2, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Mertokusumo. Sudikno., 2002. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Edisi Keenam. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Nisa. Naily Zahrotun., 2020. Aspek Legalitas Penyimpanan Minuta Akta Notaris Secara Elektronik. Jurnal Civic Hukum, Volume 5, Nomor 2.

Notodisoerjo. R. Soegondo., 1993. Hukum Notariat di Indonesia Suatu Penjelasan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Pribadi. Insan., 2018. Legalitas Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, Vol. 3 (1).

Putranto. Widiatmoko Adi., 2017. Pengelolaan Arsip di Era Digital: Mempertimbangkan Kembali Sudut Pandang Pengguna. Jurnal Diplomatik, Vol. 1, No. 1 September, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

Republic of Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN).

Republic of Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 43 Tahun 2009 tentang Kearsipan.

Rosatawati, Desy, I Made Arya Utama, and Desak Putu Dewi Kasih. 2017. Penyimpanan Protokol Notaris secara Elektronik dalam Kaitan Cyber Notary. Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Magister Kenotariatan, 2017-2018 Universitas Udayana, Acta Comunitas (2017) 2.

Setiadewi. Kadek., 2020. Legalitas Akta Notaris Berbasis Cyber Notary sebagai Akta Otentik. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Vol. 6 (2).

Sjafurrachman. 2011. Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta. Surabaya: CV. Mandar Maju.

Sunggono. Bambang., 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.