Elimination of Justice Collaborator Requirements in Granting Remissions for Corruptors in Indonesia: Progress or Setback in Legal Reform?
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Crime is an unfortunate and widespread issue in society, necessitating efforts to address it through the criminal justice system. The final step in this system involves implementing the judge's decision through the penitentiary. The rights of convicts, including the right to remission for convicts of corruption, are safeguarded by Law Number 22 of 2022 concerning Corrections. However, there has been a significant change in the requirements for obtaining remission for convicts of corruption following the issuance of Indonesian Supreme Court Decision Number 28 P/HUM/2021. This decision has led to legal reform in Indonesia, particularly concerning the conditions for granting remissions, as the requirements for justice collaborators for convicts of corruption are no longer applicable. The research conducted on this subject utilized a normative juridical method with a statutory approach. The study's findings highlight a transformative shift in Indonesia's prison system, which has evolved from a punitive-oriented approach to a more rehabilitative and correctional system. This new approach emphasizes coaching programs that focus on convicts' rights and aims to integrate them back into society successfully. As a result of these changes, the prison system now seeks not only to punish criminals but also to facilitate their recovery and improvement during their incarceration. The ultimate goal is to enable convicts to reintegrate into society positively and contribute meaningfully once their sentences are completed.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
References
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2002).
Ariyanti, Vivi. "Kebijakan Penegakan Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia." Jurnal Yuridis 6, No. 2 (2019): 33-54. https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v6i2.789
Balqis, Wizna Gania. “Pelepasan Bersyarat dalam Perspektif Tujuan Pemidanaan,” Jurnal Nalar Keadilan 1, No. 2 (2021): 82–94.
Bandura, Albert, and Richard H. Walters. Social Learning Theory. (Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, 1977).
BAPAS Klaten, “Sosialisasi Permenkumham No.7 Tahun 2022, ‘PP 99 Tidak Dicabut Tapi Ada Beberapa Pasal Yang Dirubah’’,’” Online, 2022, http://bapasklaten.kemenkumham.go.id/berita-utama/sosialisasi-permenkumham-no-7-tahun-2022-pp-99-tidak-dicabut-tapi-ada-beberapa-pasal-yang-dirubah.
Basyari, Iqbal. “RUU Pemasyarakatan Disahkan, Remisi Koruptor Bakal Lebih Mudah”, KOMPAS Online, May 28 (2022). Retrieved from https://www.kompas.id/baca/hukum/2022/05/28/ruu-pemasyarakatan-permudah-remisi-koruptor.
Berg, Mark T., and Christopher J. Schreck. "The meaning of the victim–offender overlap for criminological theory and crime prevention policy." Annual Review of Criminology 5 (2022): 277-297. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-120724
Chandra, Erika Magdalena. "Victimless Crime in Indonesia: Should We Punished Them?." Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 6, No. 2 (2019): 216-232. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v6n2.a1%0D
Dwidjaja, Prijatno. Sistem Pelaksanaan Pidana Penjara di Indonesia (Bandung: Refika Aditarma, 2006).
Efendi, Jonaedi, and Johnny Ibrahim, Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris (Jakarta: Kencana, 2016).
Fardiansyah, Ahmad Irzal, and Suseno Sigid. "Indonesian Law Enforcement; between the Lady and Banyan Tree." International Journal of Social Science and Humanity 8, No. 5 (2018): 147-150.
Freilich, Joshua D., Steven M. Chermak, and Brent R. Klein. "Investigating the applicability of situational crime prevention to the public mass violence context." Criminology & Public Policy 19, No. 1 (2020): 271-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12480
Gultom, Maidin. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak (Bandung: PT Refika Aditama, 2008).
Gunakarya, A. Widiada. Sejarah dan Konsepsi Pemasyarakatan (Bandung: Armico, 1988).
Hamzah, Andi. Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia Sdari Retribusi Ke Reformasi (Jakarta: Penerbit Pradnya Paramita, 1986).
Harsono, Harsono. Sistem Baru Pembinaan Narapidana (Jakarta: Djambatan, 1995).
Ifrani, Ifrani, “Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Kejahatan Luar Biasa,” Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum 9, No. 3 (2018): 319–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v9i3.1047
Kurniawati, Endri. “Kontroversi RUU Pemasyarakatan dan Pertanahan dalam Prolegnas", TEMPO Online, January 17 (2020). Retrieved from https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1296210/kontroversi-ruu-pemasyarakatan-dan-pertanahan-dalam-prolegnas.
Kuswandi, Kuswandi. “MA Batalkan PP 99/2012, Yudi: Aturan Itu Penting Untuk Ungkap Korupsi!” JAWA POS, 2021, https://www.jawapos.com/nasional/01/11/2021/ma-batalkan-pp-99-2012-yudi-aturan-itu-penting-untuk-ungkap-korupsi/.
Lindsey, Tim, and Helen Pausacker, eds. Crime and Punishment in Indonesia. (London: Routledge, 2020).
Muhaimin, Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum (Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020).
Muladi, Muladi. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana (Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 1995).
Mulyadi, Lilik. Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia (Normatif, Teoritis, Praktik Dan Masalahnya) (Bandung: PT Alumni, 2007).
Nabavi, Razieh Tadayon. "Bandura’s Social Learning Theory & Social Cognitive Learning Theory." Theory of Developmental Psychology 1, No.1 (2012): 1-24.
Nugraha, Aditya. “Konsep Community Based Corrections Pada Sistem Pemasyarakatan dalam Menghadapi Dampak Pemenjaraan,” Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora 4, No. 1 (2020): 141–151. https://doi.org/10.22437/jssh.v4i1.9778
Nurita, Dewi. “RUU Pemasyarakatan Disahkan, Tak Ada Pengecualian Remisi Bagi Koruptor,” TEMPO, 2022, retrieved from https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1609958/ruu-pemasyarakatan-disahkan-tak-ada-pengecualian-remisi-bagi-koruptor.
Panjaitan, Petrus Irwan, Radisman Saragih, and Inri Januar. "Persepsi Anggota Masyarakat Mengenai Resosialisasi dan Rehabilitasi Mencegah Bekas Narapidana Menjadi Residivist." To-Ra 5, No. 3 (2019): 225-244. https://doi.org/10.33541/JtVol5Iss2pp102
Pettanase, Ismail. “Pembinaan Narapidana dalam Sistem Pemasyarakatan,” Solusi 17, No. 1 (2019): 57–63.
Silaen, Febriyanti, and Syawal Amry Siregar. "Hubungan Kebijakan Kriminal dengan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana." Jurnal Darma Agung 28, No. 1 (2020): 8-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/ojsuda.v28i1.455
Situmeang, Sahat Maruli Tua. "Kebijakan Kriminal dalam Penegakan Hukum untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia." Res Nullius Law Journal 1, No. 1 (2019): 26-36. https://doi.org/10.34010/rnlj.v1i1.2492
Suparni, Suparni. Eksistensi Pidana Denda dalam Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007).
Syukma R, Doddy, Abdul Bari Azed, and Bunyamin Alamsyah, “Implikasi Berlakunya Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2022 Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak Remisi dan Pembebasan Bersyarat di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIA Jambi,” Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum 14, No. 2 (2022): 337–52. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v14i2.378
Wardah, Fathiyah. “Tanpa Syarat Pemberian Remisi di RUU Pemasyarakatan, Koruptor Makin Leluasa Bergerak”, VOA Indonesia, May 31 (2022). Retrieved from https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/tanpa-syarat-pemberian-remisi-di-ruu-pemasyarakatan-koruptor-makin-leluasa-bergerak/6597015.html
Weda, Made Darma. Kriminologi (Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 1996).
Widyawati, Anis. "Criminal Policy of Adultery in Indonesia." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 5, No. 1 (2020): 171-186. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v5i1.36786
Zulkarnain, Zulkarnain. Teori-Teori Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi (Pekanbaru: Al-Mujtahadah Press, 2016).