Pancasila Values in the New Indonesian Criminal Code: Does the Code More Humanist?
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The impending implementation of the new Indonesian Criminal Code has sparked significant debates regarding its alignment with the nation's philosophical foundation, Pancasila. This abstract scrutinizes the incorporation of Pancasila values into the revised criminal code, focusing on its potential impact on human rights and humanitarian principles. Pancasila, as Indonesia's foundational philosophy, emphasizes principles such as social justice, democracy, and the dignity of all individuals. This paper examines whether the new criminal code upholds these values or deviates from them, particularly in areas concerning individual freedoms, minority rights, and due process. Through a comprehensive analysis of key provisions in the new criminal code, the study identifies potential challenges and opportunities for aligning the legal framework with Pancasila's humanistic principles. Special attention is given to areas such as blasphemy laws, restrictions on free expression, and the treatment of marginalized communities. The research draws on legal texts, case studies, and comparative analyses to evaluate the degree to which the new criminal code promotes a more humanistic approach. Additionally, the paper explores the implications of any identified discrepancies between the legal framework and Pancasila values for Indonesia's commitment to international human rights standards. The findings contribute to ongoing discussions on legal reforms in Indonesia and provide insights into the delicate balance between preserving cultural values and ensuring the protection of individual liberties. By addressing the question of whether the new criminal code leans towards a more humanistic perspective, this study aims to inform policymakers, legal scholars, and human rights advocates on potential areas for improvement in the pursuit of a just and equitable legal system.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
References
Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin, Muchamad Ali Safaat, Aan Eko Widiarto, Dhia Al Uyun, and Muhammad Nur. “The Hierarchical Model of Delegated Legislation in Indonesia”. Lex Scientia Law Review 7, no. 2 (2023): 629-58.
Arianto, Andhie Fajar and Ludy Himawan, “Nilai Pancasila dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana,” Fairness and Justice: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum 19, no. 1 (2021): 66-72.
Budi, Mohammad Wahyu Adji Setio. “Indonesian State System Based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution: A Contemporary Developments”. Indonesian Journal of Pancasila and Global Constitutionalism 1, no. 1 (2022): 1-16.
Dahwir, Ali. “Pengembanan Filsafat Pancasila dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia” Solusi 17, no. 1 (2019): 13–22.
Dewi, Dini Anggraeni. “Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila dalam Wawasan Kebangsaan di Era Globalisasi,” Jurnal Global Citizen: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan 10, no. 2 (2021): 49–58.
Fatimah, Siti and Dinie Anggraeni Dewi, "Implementation of Pancasila Values in Building the Identity Character of the Nation's Children," Journal of Humanities Research 1, no. 3 (2021): 70–76.
Fathorrahman, Fathorrahman. “Potensi Pancasila Sebagai Falsafah Dunia.” Jurnal Renaissance 3, no. 2 (2018): 411-418.
Ferdiles, Lucky. “Reformasi Hukum dalam Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Sistem Pidana Nasional,” Lex Publica 6, no. 1 (2019): 27–28.
Janah, Tutik Nurul, and Siti Nur Ami’in, “Fiqh Sosial Paradigm for Understanding Universal Values of Pancasila,” Santri: Journal of Pesantren and Fiqh Sosial 4, no. 1 (2023): 83–100.
Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, “3 Alasan Penting Perlunya Pembaharuan KUHP,” Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 2022, https://www.kemenkumham.go.id/berita-utama/3-alasan-penting-perlunya-pembaharuan-kuhp.
Lala, Andi. “Implementasi Nilai-Nilai Pancasila dalam Pembangunan Hukum Pidana Nasional,” Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains 2, no. 5 (2021): 724-737.
Latyshev, Oleg Yurievich, Andrei Valerievich Skorobogatov, and Alexander Krasnov. “Legal Principle Between Concept and Content”. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 5, no. 2 (2020): 479-500.
Mahendra, Agustya Catur. "Ambiguity of Adultery Concept (Zina) in Criminal and Justice System (A Comparison between Indonesia, Pakistan, and Turkey)." IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) 4, no. 1 (2019): 93-106.
Mallarangan, Kartini. “Reconstruction of the Legality Principle: The Essence of the Pancasila Spirit in Criminal Law Reform,” Rechtsidee 8 (2021): 10-20070. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v8i0.782.
Manan, Bagir, and Susi Dwi Harijanti. "Artikel Kehormatan: Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang dalam Perspektif Ajaran Konstitusi dan Prinsip Negara Hukum." Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) 4, no. 2 (2017): 222-243.
Muhammad, Rusli. Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2019).
Najib, Iqbal Mar’i Ainun. "Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Materil Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Islam Nusantara." PhD Diss., UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2023.
Nugroho, S.S. Membumikan Hukum Pancasila Sebagai Basis Hukum Nasional Masa Depan (Cita Hukum Pancasila). (Solo: Iltizam, 2016).
Nurkhasanah, Finda Hastin. “The Challenge of Pancasila in Fair Law Enforcement”. Indonesian Journal of Pancasila and Global Constitutionalism 1, no. 2 (2022): 239-64.
Pratama, Memo Bayu. “Kriminalisasi Perbuatan Zina Sebagai Perwujudan Implementasi Sila Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (RKUHP),” Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam 4, no. 2 (2022): 583-590.
Rahmatullah, Indra. “Meneguhkan Kembali Indonesia Sebagai Negara Hukum Pancasila,” ADALAH 4, no. 2 (2020): 39–44.
Republic of Indonesia, “Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana,” 2023.
Saputri, Atha, and Ricky Julianto. “Comparative Justice Accountability of Samen Leven Actors in Indonesia and Malaysia”. Contemporary Issues on Interfaith Law and Society 2, no. 2 (2023): 131-160.
Setyawan, Vincentius Patria, and Itok Dwi Kurniawan, “Permaafan Hakim dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana,” Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 1 (2023): 20-24.
Sudirta, I Wayan. “Rekonstruksi Pemahaman Atas Nilai-Nilai Pancasila dalam Kehidupan Berbangsa dan Bernegara,” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 11, no. 4 (2022): 843-859.
Syahrin, Alvi, Martono Anggusti, and Abdul Azis Alsa, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana: Suatu Pengantar (Medan: CV. Merdeka Kreasi Group, 2023).
Umara, Nanda Saputra and Pathorang Halim, “Membangun Hukum Pidana Nasional di Atas Pondasi Keadilan Pancasila Dalam Wujud Nilai Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa,” Al-Qisth Law Review 5, no. 1 (2021): 176–77.
Widyawati, Anis "Criminal Policy of Adultery in Indonesia." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 5, no. 1 (2020): 171-186.