PENINGKATAN PERMAINAN SEPAK TAKRAW MELALUI PERMAINAN RANGKAIAN 3 POS PADA KELAS V SD NEGERI TARUB 01

Main Article Content

- Nasihin

Abstract

This study aims to obtain empirical information about the game due to an increase in sepak takraw game
through a series of 3 posts at primary school students Tarub 01 Sub Tarub Tegal regency. This study consists of
four stages, namely planning (planning), action (action), observation (observation) and reflection (reflection).
Data collection methods in the implementation of this action research, the researcher uses qualitative data is
data that contains information on the form of sentences that give an idea of the level of students' understanding
of a subject (cognitive), views or attitudes of the students towards the new learning method when obeying
subjects (affective ), attentive, enthusiastic in learning, confidence, motivation to learn and the like, can be
assessed qualitatively. Engineering Data Analysis To determine the effectiveness of a method in the learning
activities necessary to hold the data analysis. The results can improve performance through a series of sepak
takraw post grade 3 V. Application of instructional media innovation through a series of 3 sepak takraw ball
hanged postal and proven to improve student achievement sepak takraw Elementary School District 01 Tarub
Tarub Tegal regency. This is evidenced by mastery learning of the three aspects of assessment (cognitive,
psychomotor, and affective) increased by 19.35.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Agus Kristiyanto. 2010. Penelitian Tindakan
Kelas (dalam pendidikan jasmani dan kepelatihan
olahraga). Surakarta: UPT Penerbit dan Pencetakan
UNS (UNS Press).
Aip Syarifuddin, 1992. Sepak Takraw. (n.d):
Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi, Depdikbud.
Djumidar. 2001. Dasar-Dasar Sepak Takraw.
Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka, Depdiknas.
E. Mulyasa. 2008. Menjadi Guru Profesional.
Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
H.E. Mulyasa. 2009. Praktik Penelitian
Tindakan Kelas. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ibrahim.M. 1988.Inovasi Pendidikan.(n.d)
Made Wena. 2010.Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif
Kontemporer. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Nasihin / Journal of Physical Education, Sport, Health and Recreation 3 (2) (2014)
915
Moh. Uzer Usman. 2010. Menjadi Guru
Profesional. Bandung :PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nana Sudjana. 2009. Dasar – Dasar Proses
Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Nana Sudjana. 2004. Penilaian Hasil Proses
Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nasution. 2010. Kurikulum Dan Pengajaran .
Jakarta :Bumi Aksara.
Pupuh Fathurohman dan M.Sobry S.
2009.Strategi Belajar Mengajar (Melalui konsep umum
dan konsep islami). Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
Purwanto. 2009. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar.
Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Slameto. 2010. Belajar Dan Faktor – Faktor
Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Sofan Amri dan Iif Khoiru. A. 2010. Proses
Pembelajaran (kreatif dan inovatif dalam kelas).
Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
Subyantoro. 2009. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas.
Bandung: PT Remaja Karya.
Suharsimi A, Suhardjono dan Supardi. 2009.
Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Yudha M. Saputra. 2001. Dasar-Dasar
Keterampilan atletik. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral
Olahraga, Depdiknas.
http://sitimasrurohum.blogspot.com/2009/05/desai
n-robot.html
http://hilman.web.id/posting/blog/827/pengertianfungsi-
dan-prosedur-evaluasipembelajaran.
html
http://wawan-junaidi.blogspot.com/2010/04/fungsievaluasi.
html
http://weblogpendidikan.
blogspot.com/2009/09/fungsidan-
tujuan-evaluasi-pembelajaran.html