A Conceptual Synthesis of Malaysia’s Rural Transformation Programme (RTP) and Indonesia’s Dana Desa: A Narrative Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jphi.v8i1.27407Keywords:
rural development, governance, decentralization, Structured and Responsive Hybrid Governance Model, Narrative ReviewAbstract
Rural development remains central to socio-economic equity in Southeast Asia, yet governance approaches vary significantly across countries. This narrative review offers a conceptual comparison between Malaysia’s Rural Transformation Programme (RTP), characterised by centralised policy control, and Indonesia’s Dana Desa, which is rooted in fiscal decentralisation and community empowerment. While each model has strengths, neither fully addresses the complexities of diverse rural settings. Through a theory synthesis approach, the study analyses structural, institutional, and participatory differences, drawing on multi-level governance, empowerment theory, and problem-driven iterative adaptation (PDIA). Based on these insights, the paper proposes the Structured and Responsive Hybrid Governance (THBR) model, a flexible framework that integrates national policy coherence with local autonomy and adaptive feedback mechanisms. The model offers a scalable approach to rural development suited to varied institutional capacities, particularly within the ASEAN context. THBR contributes to both theoretical discourse and policy design by bridging the divide between top-down and bottom-up governance in complex rural environments.
References
Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2013). Escaping capability traps through problem-driven iterative adaptation (PDIA). World Development, 51, 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.05.011
ASEAN Secretariat. (2022). ASEAN Master Plan on Rural Development 2022–2026. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/34-ASEAN-Master-Plan-on-Rural-Development-2022-2026.pdf
Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications.
da Gama, G. R. (2024). Village governance and development in Indonesia: Progress and challenges. Devpolicy Blog. https://devpolicy.org/village-governance-and-development-in-indonesia-progress-and-challenges-20241114/
Grindle, M. S. (2004). Good enough governance: Poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance, 17(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00256.x
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2001). Multi-level governance and European integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2017). Dana Desa: Mengelola dana, memajukan desa. https://www.kemenkeu.go.id
Kementerian Pembangunan Luar Bandar (KPLB). (2019). Laporan Tahunan KPLB 2019. https://www.rurallink.gov.my
Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Schakel, A. H. (2008). Patterns of regional authority. Regional and Federal Studies, 18(2–3), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560801987870
Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
Permana, C. T., & Harsanto, B. (2020). Sustainable city planning concepts and practices in emerging economies: A systematic review. The Journal of Indonesia Sustainable Development Planning, 1(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.46456/jisdep.v1i1.32
Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024379
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California Press.
Rashid, M. F., Rahayu, P., Andini, I., & Permana, C. T. (2025). Differentiation of tourism performance in rural areas: Case study of Desa Lestari, Malaysia and Desa Mandiri, Indonesia. Planning Malaysia, 23(36). https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v23i36.1722
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Open University Press.
Rondinelli, D. A., & Cheema, G. S. (1983). Decentralization and development: Policy implementation in developing countries. Sage Publications. https://archive.org/details/decentralization0000unse_e5e8
Salam, S., Harahap, H., & Supriyadi, R. (2024). Evaluating fiscal decentralization and rural inequality in post-Dana Desa Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian Development Studies, 16(1), 33–51.
Setiawan, B., & Nugroho, Y. (2023). Rural development from village funds, village-owned enterprises, and village original income in Indonesia. Journal of Rural Studies, 95, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.11.003
Siti Aminah, R., Abu Samah, A., & Abdul Ghani, J. (2016). Effectiveness of rural development programmes in Malaysia: A study of Rural Transformation Centre (RTC). Geografia-Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(3), 12–22.
Smoke, P. (2003). Decentralisation in Africa: Goals, dimensions, myths and challenges. Public Administration and Development, 23(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.255
Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of Community Psychology (pp. 43–63). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2
Downloads
Published
Article ID
27407Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adi Syahid bin Mohd Ali, Tuan Muhammad Zukri bin Tuan Sembok, Suyatno Ladiqi, Sholahuddin Al-Fatih (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). All writings published in this journal are personal views of the author and do not represent the views of this journal and the author’s affiliated institutions.
