Actio Pauliana in Bankruptcy Cases and Their Legal Effects (Case Study of Supreme Court Decision No. 388 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2014)
Actio Pauliana dalam Perkara Kepailitan dan Akibat Hukumnya (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 388 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2014)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/arls.vol1i2.4096Keywords:
Actio Pauliana, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Buyer, Legal ConsequencesAbstract
This research delves into the Actio Pauliana in bankruptcy cases, which involves legal action taken prior to declaring bankruptcy against the Debtor. The method employed in this research is a qualitative approach, utilizing statutory regulations and case studies. This type of research is normative juridical, examining and analyzing Supreme Court Decision No. 388 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2014, the Civil Code, Law No.37/2004, Law no. 40/2007, and interviews with bankruptcy experts. Primary data sources include interviews with bankruptcy experts, while secondary data sources consist of primary legal materials such as legislation and court decisions, along with secondary legal materials like books, journals, and articles related to the research, as well as tertiary legal materials. Researchers gathered legal analysis materials and conducted literature studies, which were discussed qualitatively and descriptively. The discussion in this research revolves around the legal act of transferring company assets through a sale, executed under the name of the President Director before the court's decision to declare bankruptcy, as well as the legal consequences of the sale and purchase agreement, and the examination of evidence regarding the actions of the main director.
References
Assyakurrohim, D., Ikhram, D., Sirodj, R. A., & Afgani, M. W. (2022). Metode Studi Kasus dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Komputer, 3(01), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.47709/jpsk.v3i01.1951
Astara, I Wayan Wesna. (n.d.). Hukum Kepailitan Teori Dan Praktik (M. S. I. Drs I Nyoman Mardika dan M. I Made Artawan, SE (eds.); I). Warmadewa University Press.
Bachtiar. (2019). Metode Penelitian Hukum (O. Yanto (ed.); Issue 1). UNPAM PRESS.
Dan, H. K., Sulisrudatin, N., & Ip, S. (2014). Hukum Kepailitan Dan Permasalahannya Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 7(1), 158– 173. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v7i1.129
Dewi, Putu Eka Trisna. (2021). Actio Pauliana As a Legal Protection Effort Towards Creditors from Bad Faith Debtors in Bankruptcy Cases. Proceeding International Conference Faculty of …, 28–33. https://e-journal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/icfl/article/view/4749
I Wayan Wesna Astara. (n.d.). Hukum Kepailitan Teori Dan Praktik (M. S. I. Drs I Nyoman Mardika & M. I Made Artawan, SE (eds.); I). Warmadewa University Press.
Kadir, Y. (2014). Pembuktian Sederhana Dalam Kepailitan. Calyptra: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya, 3(1), 1–27.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Kukus, F. M. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Profesi Kurator Dalam Perkara Kepailitan. Lex Privatum, III(2), 146–153. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/7844/7408
Kurniawan, G. P., Shalikhah, S. Z., Shofiat, H., Azizah, N. N., & Mahmud Mochtar. (2021). Kepastian Hukum atas Proses Pembuktian dalam Gugatan Actio Pauliana Perkara Kepailitan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 560 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2021). Jurnal Tana Mana, 2(1), 46–48.
Mantili, R. (2021). Actio Pauliana Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Bagi Kreditor Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Dan Undang-Undang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Pkpu). ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 6(2), 21. https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v6i2.127
Manullang, R., & Taufiq, M. (2018). Analisis Yuridis Atas Pembatalan Perbuatan Hukum Debitur Pailit (Actio Paulina) Dikaitkan Dengan Peran Dan Fungsi Kurator. Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law, 10(2), 92. https://doi.org/10.30997/jill.v10i2.1495
Marpi Yupiter, Pujiono, Purwadi Hari. (2023). Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan The Concept of Actio Pauliana Creditor Law Bankruptcy Boedel Dispute Process to Achieve. 11(3), 1–9.
Monica Yuniartha Naibaho, Yuhelson, & Cicilia Julyani Tondy. (2022). Eksistensi Harta Bersama Dalam Harta Pailit Terkait Dengan Tindakan Actio Pauliana Yang Diajukan Oleh Kurator. Jurnal Gagasan Hukum, 4(2), 80–89. https://journal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/gh/article/view/12147
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Novikasari, S. R., & Harahap, N. A. (2021). Pemenuhan Hak Atas Informasi Masyarakat Dalam Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Tanah: Studi Pengadaan Tanah Taman Budaya Sleman. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 28(2), 635–656. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss2.art9
Nyaman,Rizal Syah, Dewi, D. L. (2023). PROSEDUR HUKUM PERMOHONAN PAILIT DALAM HUKUM KEPAILITAN DI INDONESIA. 21, 420–440.
Priawan, Devi Risal (2018). Kedudukan Bank sebagai Kreditor Separatis dalam Permohonan Perkara Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. 26(1), 23–38.
Rara, M., & Retno, T. (2023). Legal Protection for Creditors Who Are Harmed by Debtors (Actio Pauliana Practice). International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 448–453.
Saurmauli, R. I. (2022). Legal Certainty of Actio Pauliana Decision in Bankruptcy Cases. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 1(7), 386–393. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v1i7.92
Sjawie, H. F. (2017). Tanggung Jawab Direksi Perseroan Terbatas Atas Tindakan Ultra Vires. Jurnal Hukum Prioris, 6(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.25105/prio.v6i1.1886
Soeroso, R. (2011). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum (1st ed.). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. Serlika, Aprita, (2002). Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Malang: Setara Press.
Sujana Hanifudin. (n.d.). ( JUDICIAL REVIEW REGARDING THE PRINCIPLE OF GOOD INTENTION FOR THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT OF THE MOVING OBJECT ).
Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung No. 4 Tahun 2014
Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung No.3 Tahun 2023
Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung No.5 Tahun 2014
Suryahartati, D. (2013). Doktrin Ultra Vires (Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas). Inovatif: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(7), 113–126.
Suryana, Ms. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian : Metodologi Penelitian Model Prakatis Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 1–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
Sutan, Sjahdeini Remy. (2018). Sejarah,Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan (2nd ed.). Prenadan Media Group.
Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang
Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah
Waruwu, A. P. (2022). Qualification of Ultra Vires Act by Board of Directors Company in Indonesian Law and Court. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 1(5), 298–307. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v1i5.81
Yuhelson. (2019). Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Ideas Publishing.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
4096Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Moh Rahmat Rizki Romadhan, Duhita Driyah Suprapti (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
